Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Coping with Technological Disruption

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Challenges in Classical Liberalism

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Classical Liberalism ((PASTCL))

  • 106 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter addresses technology critics and others worried about the effects of technological disruption. It offers a framework rooted in rational optimism about how innovation generally continues to bring about positive outcomes for individuals and society. While the evidence supporting this assertion is voluminous, many defenders of progress make poor champions of their cause. Those defending technological innovation will need to do a better job communicating its benefits while also considering new strategies to counter its occasional downsides. This chapter concludes by offering some suggestions for how to do so.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Ip (2019) notes: “Poverty around the world is plummeting; half the world is now middle class; and illiteracy, disease and deadly violence are receding. These things don’t make headlines because they are gradual, relentless and unsurprising. That is why they are worth highlighting. The problems the world faces are far smaller than those it has already overcome and can be solved the same way: not by betting on miracles but by patiently applying knowledge and tools we already possess.”

  2. 2.

    For a critique of such thinking, see Florman (1994: p. 16), “Anxiety and alienation are the watchwords of the day, as if material comforts made life worse, rather than better.”

  3. 3.

    Gillespie (2019): “Prosperity is central to most human values. A wealthier world helps you be more creative.”

  4. 4.

    Marchant and Allenby (2017: p. 108) define soft law as “a variety of nonbinding norms and techniques,” which include “instruments or arrangements that create substantive expectations that are not directly enforceable, unlike ‘hard law’ requirements such as treaties and statutes.”

  5. 5.

    They continue on to note that “[m]achines will take on more repetitive and laborious tasks, but seem no closer to eliminating the need for human labour than at any time in the last 150 years. It is not hard to think of pressing, unmet needs even in the rich world: the care of the elderly and the frail, lifetime education and retraining, health care, physical and mental well-being.”

References

  • Andreeva N (2021) Peak TV: Scripted originals dipped in 2020 for the first time since FX launched tally amid pandemic. Deadline, 29 January.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bajarin T (2013) The smartphone is the Swiss Army knife of gadgets. Time, 18 November.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broughel J, Thierer A (2019) Technological innovation and economic growth: A brief report on the evidence. Mercatus Center, Arlington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlen J (2016) A brief history of entrepreneurship: The pioneers, profiteers, and racketeers who shaped our world. Columbia University Press, New York.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Collinson P, Cowen T (2019) We need a new science of progress. The Atlantic, 30 July.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowen T (2008) In praise of commercial culture. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desmas J (2021a) Voters already love technology-they don’t need anti-China messaging to get there. Vox, 3 May.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischhoff B, Brewer NT, Downs JS (2011) Communicating risks and benefits: An evidence-based user’s guide. Food and Drug Administration, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Food and Drug Administration (2009) Strategic plan for risk communication. Food and Drug Administration, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedel R (2010) A culture of improvement: Technology and the Western millennium. MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frischmann B, Selinger E (2018) Re-engineering humanity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Florman SC (1994) The existential pleasures of engineering. St Martins Griffin, New York, 2nd edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilder G (1984) The spirit of enterprise. Simon and Schuster, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie N (2019) Tyler Cowen’s gospel of prosperity. Reason, March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillmor D (2004) We the media: Grassroots journalism by the people, for the people. O’Reilly Media, Inc., Sebastopol.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hagemann R, Huddleston Skees J, Thierer A (2018) Soft law for hard problems: The governance of emerging technologies in an uncertain future. Colorado Tech Law J 17:37–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haskell TL (1985) Capitalism and the origins of the humanitarian sensibility, part 1. Amer Hist Rev 90: 339–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heath D, Garcia-Roberts G (2021) Race to the vaccine. USA Today, 31 January.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ip G (2019) The world is getting quietly, relentlessly better. Wall Street Journal, 2 January.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarvis J (2015) Optimism doesn’t sell. Medium, 25 May.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson DG (2011) Software agents, anticipatory ethics, and accountability. In: Marchant KE, Allenby BR, Herkert, JR (eds) The growing gap between emerging technologies and legal-ethical oversight: The pacing problem. Springer, Dordecht, 61–76.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Juma C (2016) Innovation and its enemies: Why people resist new technologies. Oxford University Press, New York.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly K (2016) The inevitable: Understanding the 12 technological forces that will shape our future. Viking, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lepore J (2017) A golden age for dystopian fiction. New Yorker, 5 and 12 June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis N (2018) The enduring wisdom of the crowd. Spiked, 24 October.

    Google Scholar 

  • Longworth R (2015) A misguided view on technology and humanism. Chicago Council on Global Affairs, 20 January.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marchant GE, Allenby B (2017) Soft law: New tools for governing emerging technologies. B Atom Sci 73:108–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell MD (2012) The pathology of privilege: The economic consequences of government favoritism. Mercatus Center, Arlington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mokyr J, Vickers C, Ziebarth NL (2015) The history of technological anxiety and the future of economic growth: Is this time different? J Econ Perspect 29:31–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morozov E (2015) The taming of tech criticism. The Baffler 27, March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy R (2021b) This is what peak culture looks like. Works in Progress, 20 May.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridley M (2010) The rational optimist: How prosperity evolves. Harper Collins, New York.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Roser M (2018) Memorizing these three statistics will help you understand the world. Gates Notes, 26 June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosling H (2018) Ten reasons we’re wrong about the world—And why things are better than you think. Flatiron Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saner MA (2013) The role of adaptation in the governance of emerging technologies. In: Marchant KE, Abbott KW, Brown JE (eds) Innovative governance models for emerging technologies. Edward Elgar, Northhampton, 92–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz B (2004) The paradox of choice: Why more is less. Ecco, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepardson D (2021) U.S. labor leader calls for human drivers in automated vehicles. Reuters, 18 May.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith A (1759) Theory of moral sentiments. A Millar in the Strand, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart I, De D, Cole A (2014) Technology and people: The great job-creating machine. Deloitte LLP, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor MZ (2016) The politics of innovation: Why some countries are better than others at science and technology. Oxford University Press, Cambridge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Thierer A, Esbin B (2009) An offer they can’t refuse: Spectrum reallocation that can benefit consumers, broadcasters and the mobile broadband sector. Progress Snapshot Release 5.13, Progress & Freedom Foundation, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thierer A (2013) Technopanics, threat inflation, and the danger of an information technology precautionary principle. Minn J Law Sci Tech 14:312–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thierer A (2014) Muddling through: How we learn to cope with technological change. Medium, 30 June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thierer A (2016) Permissionless innovation: The continuing case for comprehensive technological freedom. Mercatus Center, Arlington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thierer A (2017) Are ‘permissionless innovation’ and ‘responsible innovation’ compatible? Technology Liberation Front, 12 July.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thierer A (2018a) Is it ‘techno-chauvinist’ and ‘anti-humanist’ to believe in the transformative potential of technology? Medium, 18 September.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thierer A (2018b) The pacing problem and the future of technology regulation. The Bridge, 9 August.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thierer A (2019a) Countering threats to innovation with rational optimism. Technology Liberation Front, 29 April 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thierer A (2019b) Is there a science of progress. AIER, 8 August.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thierer A (2020a) Evasive entrepreneurs and the future of governance: How innovation improves economies and governments. Cato Institute, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thierer A (2020b) Voice, exit, and innovation. Cato Unbound, 10 August.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thierer A (2020c) Existential risk and emerging technology governance. Technology Liberation Front, 5 August.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thierer A (2020d) Soft law in ICT sectors: Four case studies. Jurimetrics 61: 79–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallensten (2018) Cloud computing: Co-invention for the masses. Technology Policy Institute Blog, 19 July.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wieseltier L (2015) Among the disrupted. New York Times, 7 January.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Street Institute, Washington, DC, USA

    Adam Thierer

Authors
  1. Adam Thierer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adam Thierer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Business & Economics Department, Roanoke College, Salem, VA, USA

    Alice L. Kassens

  2. Business and Economics, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA

    Joshua C. Hall

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Thierer, A. (2023). Coping with Technological Disruption. In: Kassens, A.L., Hall, J.C. (eds) Challenges in Classical Liberalism. Palgrave Studies in Classical Liberalism. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-32890-9_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-32890-9_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-32889-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-32890-9

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation