Skip to main content

The Impact of Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Nonsurgical and Surgical Treatment Planning

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
3D Imaging in Endodontics

Abstract

Development of an appropriate treatment plan follows diagnosis and could be considered the foundation of a successful outcome. Until the recent introduction of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) for dental uses, two-dimensional radiographic imaging has been the standard for dental treatment planning. In endodontics, subjective history, clinical findings, and diagnostic imaging are all essential components of the preoperative diagnosis and treatment plan (Reit C, Petersson K, Textbook of Endodontology. Wiley-Blackwell, UK, 2010). Conventional two-dimensional radiographs provide a cost-effective, high-resolution image, which continues to be the most popular method of imaging today. However, the diagnostic potential of periapical radiographs is limited. Information may be difficult to interpret, especially when the anatomy and background pattern is complex (Kundel HL, Revesz G, Am J Roentgenol 126:1233–8, 1976). Recently, CBCT has been demonstrated to be a useful tool in a number of endodontic applications. The aim of this chapter is to compare the relative value of preoperative periapical radiographs and CBCT in the decision-making process in nonsurgical and surgical endodontic treatment planning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Reit C, Petersson K. Diagnosis of pulpal and periradicular disease. In: Bergenholtz G, Horsted-Bindslev P, Reit C, editors. Textbook of endodontology. 2nd ed. UK: Wiley-Blackwell; 2010. p. 235–53.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kundel HL, Revesz G. Lesion conspicuity, structured noise, and film reader error. Am J Roentgenol. 1976;126:1233–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Maini A, Durning P, Drage N. Resorption: within or without? The benefit of cone-beam computed tomography when diagnosing a case of an internal/external resorption defect. Br Dent J. 2008;9:135–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Patel S, Ricucci D, Durak C, Tay F. Internal root resorption: a review. J Endod. 2010;36:1107–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Estrela C, Bueno M, De Alencar AH, et al. Method to evaluate inflammatory root resorption by using cone beam computed tomography. J Endod. 2009;35:1491–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hassan B, Metska ME, Ozok AR, et al. Detection of vertical root fractures in endodontically treated teeth by a cone beam computed tomography scan. J Endod. 2009;35:719–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bernardes RA, de Moraes IG, Húngaro Duarte MA, et al. Use of cone-beam volumetric tomography in the diagnosis of root fractures. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009;108:270–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Edlund M, Nair MK, Nair UP. Detection of vertical root fractures by using cone-beam computed tomography: a clinical study. J Endod. 2011;37:768–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Fayad MI, Ashkenaz PJ, Johnson BR. Different representations of vertical root fractures detected by cone-beam volumetric tomography: a case series report. J Endod. 2012;38:1435–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Michetti J, Maret D, Mallet JP, Diemer F. Validation of cone beam computed tomography as a tool to explore root canal anatomy. J Endod. 2010;36:1187–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Liang YH, Li G, Wesselink PR, Wu MK. Endodontic outcome predictors identified with periapical radiographs and cone-beam computed tomography scans. J Endod. 2011;37:326–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. de Paula-Silva FW, Wu MK, Leonardo MR, et al. Accuracy of periapical radiography and cone-beam computed tomography scans in diagnosing apical periodontitis using histopathological findings as a gold standard. J Endod. 2009;35:1009–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Velvart P, Hecker H, Tillinger G. Detection of the apical lesion and the mandibular canal in conventional radiography and computed tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2001;92:682–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Stavropoulos A, Wenzel A. Accuracy of cone beam dental CT, intraoral digital and conventional film radiography for the detection of periapical lesions: an ex vivo study in pig jaws. Clin Oral Investig. 2007;11:101–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Nakata K, Naitoh M, Izumi M, et al. Effectiveness of dental computed tomography in diagnostic imaging of periradicular lesion of each root of a multirooted tooth: a case report. J Endod. 2006;32:583–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lofthag-Hansen S, Huumonen S, Grondahl K, Grondahl HG. Limited cone-bean CT and intraoral radiography for the diagnosis of periapical pathology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007;103:114–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Cotton TP, Geisler TM, Holden DT, et al. Endodontic applications of cone-beam volumetric tomography. J Endod. 2007;33:1121–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Patel S, Dawood A, Whaites E, Pitt FT. New dimensions in endodontic imaging: part 1. Conventional and alternative radiographic systems. Int Endod J. 2009;42:447–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Patel S. New dimensions in endodontic imaging: part 2. Cone beam computed tomography. Int Endod J. 2009;42:463–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Scarfe WC, Farman AG, Sukovic P. Clinical applications of cone-beam computed tomography in dental practice. J Can Dent Assoc. 2006;72:75–80.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Nair MK, Nair UP. Digital and advanced imaging in endodontics: a review. J Endod. 2007;33:1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ee J, Fayad MI, Johnson BR. Comparison of endodontic diagnosis and treatment planning decisions using cone-beam volumetric tomography versus periapical radiography. J Endod. 2014;40:910–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Rodriguez G, Abella F, Duran-Sindreu F, Patel S, Roig M. Influence of cone-beam computed tomography in clinical decision making among specialists. J Endod. 2017;43:194–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Bhatt M, Coil J, Chehroudi B, Esteves A, Aleksejuniene J, MacDonald D. Clinical decision-making and importance of the AAE/AAOMR position statement for CBCT examination in endodontic cases. Int Endod J. 2021;54:26–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohamed I. Fayad .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Fayad, M.I., Johnson, B.R. (2023). The Impact of Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Nonsurgical and Surgical Treatment Planning. In: Fayad, M.I., Johnson, B.R. (eds) 3D Imaging in Endodontics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-32755-1_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-32755-1_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-32754-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-32755-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics