Abstract
Pericardial disorders are often seen in clinical practice. Due to potential problems in differential diagnosis and the absence of particular signs in first-line imaging modalities, their diagnosis and treatment are neither prompt nor straightforward. Pericardial diseases include inflammation (pericarditis), constriction, effusion, tamponade, while pericardial cysts, masses, and pericardial agenesis are rarer.
Pericardial evaluation is a domain of echocardiography which allows, in most cases, to comprehensively explore both morphological changes (membranes thickening, calcifications, effusions) and their functional impact on diastolic filling. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) has emerged as one of the most versatile imaging modalities to image the pericardium. CMR is able to blend anatomy, physiology, and tissue characterization to obtain the most precise diagnosis possible for even the most challenging pericardial disorders.
The normal pericardium appears as a thin hypointense line (1–2 mm thick), surrounded by hyperintense mediastinal and epicardial fat on T1-weighted imaging. Similarly to myocardial diseases, pericardial tissue characterization is usually accomplished by using cine steady-state free precession (SSFP) imaging, dark-blood T1-weighted, T2-weighted, and short-tau inversion-recovery (STIR) fast spin-echo (FSE) imaging, first pass perfusion, and late T1-weighted contrast-enhanced imaging (LGE). Phase contrast sequences allow evaluation of ventricular in- and out-flow patterns; real-time cine sequences track beat-to-beat cardiac movements.
Acute, chronic, recurring, and constrictive pericarditis, as well as pericarditis-related consequences, pericardial masses, and congenital pericardial abnormalities, are often seen in clinical practice and are associated with a high incidence of morbidity and death. Due to the difficulty of diagnosis, CMR imaging is a necessary tool to confirm the diagnosis and elucidate the underlying pathophysiology.
This chapter aims to provide an up-to-date view on the numerous potentials of CMR imaging in pericardial disease, highlighting the significance of CMR in guiding diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment tailoring via the use of clinical examples.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Misselt AJ, Harris SR, Glockner J, Feng D, Syed IS, Araoz PA. MR imaging of the pericardium. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2008;16(2):185–99.
Bogaert J, Francone M. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance in pericardial diseases. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2009;11:14.
Imazio M. Myopericardial diseases. Cham: Springer; 2016.
Imazio M, Pedrotti P, Quattrocchi G, Roghi A, Badano L, Faletti R, Bogaert J, Gaita F. Multimodality imaging of pericardial diseases. J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2016;17(11):774–82.
Adler Y, Charron P, Imazio M, et al. 2015 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of pericardial diseases: the task force for the diagnosis and Management of Pericardial Diseases of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) endorsed by: the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2015;36(42):2921–64.
Klein AL, Abbara S, Agler DA, Appleton CP, Asher CR, Hoit B, Hung J, Garcia MJ, Kronzon I, Oh JK, Rodriguez ER, Schaff HV, Schoenhagen P, Tan CD, White RD. American Society of Echocardiography clinical recommendations for multimodality cardiovascular imaging of patients with pericardial disease: endorsed by the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance and Society of cardiovascular computed tomography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2013;26(9):965–1012.e15.
Bogaert J, Cruz I, Voigt JU, Sinnaeve P, Imazio M. Value of pericardial effusion as imaging biomarker in acute pericarditis, do we need to focus on more appropriate ones? Int J Cardiol. 2015;191:284–5.
Imazio M, Gaita F, LeWinter M. Evaluation and treatment of pericarditis: a systematic review. JAMA. 2015;314(14):1498–506.
Alraies MC, AlJaroudi W, Yarmohammadi H, Yingchoncharoen T, Schuster A, Senapati A, Tariq M, Kwon D, Griffin BP, Klein AL. Usefulness of cardiac magnetic resonance-guided management in patients with recurrent pericarditis. Am J Cardiol. 2015;115(4):542–7.
Psychidis-Papakyritsis P, de Roos A, Kroft LJ. Functional MRI of congenital absence of the pericardium. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007;189(6):W312–4. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.05.1655.
Macaione F, Barison A, Pescetelli I, Pali F, Pizzino F, Terrizzi A, Di Lisi D, Novo G, Todiere G, Assennato P, Novo S, Aquaro GD. Quantitative criteria for the diagnosis of the congenital absence of pericardium by cardiac magnetic resonance. Eur J Radiol. 2016;85(3):616–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.12.021. Epub 2015 Dec 29.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Electronic Supplementary Material
Short-axis real-time cine imaging (MP4 5336 kb)
Two-chamber bSSFP cine view (MP4 149 kb)
Four-chamber bSSFP cine view (MP4 133 kb)
Two-chamber bSSFP cine view after 1-year follow-up (MP4 148 kb)
Four-chamber bSSFP cine view after 1-year follow-up (MP4 146 kb)
Two-chamber bSSFP cine view (MP4 138 kb)
Four-chamber bSSFP cine view (MP4 136 kb)
Four-chamber cine view (acquired before Gd injection) (MP4 133 kb)
Mid-ventricular short-axis cine view (acquired after Gd injection), showing the hypointense thrombus sealing the anterior wall rupture (MP4 132 kb)
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Di Bella, G., Licordari, R., Pizzino, F., Imazio, M. (2023). Pericardial Diseases. In: Barison, A., Dellegrottaglie, S., Pontone, G., Indolfi, C. (eds) Case-based Atlas of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-32593-9_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-32593-9_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-32592-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-32593-9
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)