Skip to main content

Tetrahedral and Dodecahedral UASs, Structured Designs

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Applications: Challenges and Trends

Abstract

Modular robotic systems offer an attractive edge in terms of adaptability, configurability, scalability and reliability; they are easy to maintain, manufacture, store, and transport. We introduce a variety of modular designs for unmanned aerial robotic systems based on tetrahedral and dodecahedral shapes. These modules, once connected with each other, allow the operator to build customizable vehicles with desirable structural and aerodynamic characteristics. Some of these designs are directly influenced by fractal geometry, following and building upon the early works of Alexander Graham Bell and his kites shaped after Sierpiński tetrahedra. Combining the possibility of building modules that contain both propulsive elements and lifting surfaces, a vertical take-off and landing modular UAV structure is introduced. In addition to their aerodynamic and structural characteristics, control strategies for large assemblies of powered modules are discussed, including ways to leverage the presence of multiple, redundant avionics provided by the multiple modules.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. R.J. Shaw, History of flight. NASA. Accessed 10 Aug 2022. https://www.grc.nasa.gov/www/k-12/UEET/StudentSite/historyofflight.html. (Visited on 05/13/2021)

  2. A.E. Moule, New China and Old: Personal Recollections and Observations of Thirty Years (Seeley, 1892)

    Google Scholar 

  3. P. Boitani et al., Winged Words: Flight in Poetry and History (Read-HowYouWant.com, 2010)

    Google Scholar 

  4. D. Zaelke, Aviation partners the future is on the wing, in Industry Genius (Routledge, 2017), pp. 32–52

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. Marinoni, C. Pedretti et al., Il codice atlantico della Biblioteca Ambrosiana di Milano, vol. 2 (Giunti, 2000)

    Google Scholar 

  6. R. Merkert, J. Bushell, Managing the drone revolution: a systematic literature review into the current use of airborne drones and future strategic directions for their effective control. J. Air Trans. Manag. 89, 101929 (2020). ISSN: 0969-6997. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2020.101929. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969699720305123

  7. K. Ulrich, The role of product architecture in the manufacturing firm. Res. Policy 24(3), 419–440 (1995) ISSN: 0048-7333. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(94)00775-3. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0048733394007753

  8. A.G. Bell, Aerial vehicle or other-structure, US Patent No. A770626 (1904)

    Google Scholar 

  9. R. Oung, A. Ramezani, R. D’Andrea, Feasibility of a distributed flight array, in Proceedings of the 48h IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) Held Jointly with 2009 28th Chinese Control Conference (IEEE, 2009), pp. 3038–3044

    Google Scholar 

  10. R. Oung, R. D’Andrea, The distributed flight array. Mechatronics 21(6), 908–917 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. R. Oung, R. D’Andrea, The distributed flight array: design, implementation, and analysis of a modular vertical take-off and landing vehicle. Int. J. Robot. Res. 33(3), 375–400 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1177/0278364913501212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. R. Naldi, F. Forte, L. Marconi, A class of modular aerial robots, in 2011 50th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control and European Control Conference (IEEE, 2011), pp. 3584–3589

    Google Scholar 

  13. R. Naldi et al., A modular aerial vehicle with redundant actuation, in 2013 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IEEE, 2013), pp. 1393–1398

    Google Scholar 

  14. R. Naldi et al., Modeling and control of a class of modular aerial robots combining under actuated and fully actuated behavior. IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol. 23(5), 1869–1885 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/TCST.2015.2391173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. M.J. Duffy, A. Samaritano, The lift! project-modular, electric vertical lift system with ground power tether, in 33rd AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference (2015), p. 3013

    Google Scholar 

  16. M.J. Duffy, S.H. Bouwer, J.J. Mattero, Modular vehicle lift system, US Patent No. 9457899 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  17. D. Saldana et al., Modquad: the flying modular structure that self-assembles in midair, in 2018 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) (IEEE, 2018), pp. 691–698

    Google Scholar 

  18. G. Li et al., ModQuad-Vi: a vision-based self-assembling modular quadrotor, in 2019 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) (IEEE, 2019), pp. 346–352

    Google Scholar 

  19. D. Saldana, P.M. Gupta, V. Kumar, Design and control of aerial modules for inflight self-disassembly. IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett. 4(4), 3410–3417 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. N. Gandhi et al., Self-reconfiguration in response to faults in modular aerial systems. IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett. 5(2), 2522–2529 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. M.A. da Silva Ferreira et al., Drone reconfigurable architecture (DRA): a multipurpose modular architecture for unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). J. Intell. & Robot. Syst. 99(3), 517–534 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  22. C. Montalvo, M. Costello, Meta aircraft flight dynamics. J. Aircraft 52(1), 107–115 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  23. S.J. Carlson, P. Arora, C. Papachristos, A multi-VTOL modular aspect ratio reconfigurable aerial robot, in 2022 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) (2022), pp. 8–15. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRA46639.2022.9811542

  24. M.D. Patterson, J.R. Quinlan, W.J. Fredericks, Modular unmanned aerial system with multi-mode propulsion (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  25. M. Zhao et al., Transformable multirotor with two-dimensional multilinks: modeling, control, and motion planning for aerial transformation. Adv. Robot. 30(13), 825–845 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. T. Anzai et al., Multilinked multirotor with internal communication system for multiple objects transportation based on form optimization method, in 2017 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) (IEEE, 2017), pp. 5977–5984

    Google Scholar 

  27. M. Zhao et al., Whole-body aerial manipulation by transformable multirotor with two-dimensional multilinks, in 2017 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) (IEEE, 2017), pp. 5175–5182

    Google Scholar 

  28. M. Zhao et al., Transformable multirotor with two-dimensional multilinks: modeling, control, and whole-body aerial manipulation. Int. J. Robot. Res. 37(9), 1085–1112 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. M. Zhao et al., Design, modeling, and control of an aerial robot dragon: a dual-rotor-embedded multilink robot with the ability of multi-degree-of freedom aerial transformation. IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett. 3(2), 1176–1183 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. M. Zhao et al., Flight motion of passing through small opening by dragon: transformable multilinked aerial robot, in 2018 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) (IEEE, 2018), pp. 4735–4742

    Google Scholar 

  31. B. Gabrich et al., A flying gripper based on cuboid modular robots, in 2018 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) (IEEE, 2018), pp. 7024–7030

    Google Scholar 

  32. B. Gabrich, G. Li, M. Yim, Modquad-dof: a novel yaw actuation for modular quadrotors, in 2020 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) (IEEE, 2020), pp. 8267–8273

    Google Scholar 

  33. H.-N. Nguyen et al., A novel robotic platform for aerial manipulation using quadrotors as rotating thrust generators. IEEE Trans. Robot. 34(2), 353–369 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. M. Kulkarni, H. Nguyen, K. Alexis, The reconfigurable aerial robotic chain: shape and motion planning. IFAC-PapersOnLine 53(2), 9295–9302 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. H. Nguyen, T. Dang, K. Alexis, The reconfigurable aerial robotic chain: modeling and control, in 2020 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) (IEEE, 2020), pp. 5328–5334

    Google Scholar 

  36. J. Lee, Optimization of a modular drone delivery system, in 2017 Annual IEEE International Systems Conference (SysCon) (2017), pp. 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/SYSCON.2017.7934790

  37. A. Tagliabue et al., Shapeshifter: a multi-agent, multi-modal robotic platform for exploration of Titan, in 2020 IEEE Aerospace Conference (2020), pp. 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1109/AERO47225.2020.9172739

  38. H.S. Macdonald Coxeter, Regular Polytopes (Courier Corporation, 1973)

    Google Scholar 

  39. J. Chilton, Space Grid Structures (Routledge, 2007)

    Google Scholar 

  40. V.S. Deshpande, M.F. Ashby, N.A. Fleck, Foam topology: bending versus stretching dominated architectures. Acta Mater. 49(6), 1035–1040 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. G. Zhang et al., Mechanical behaviour of CFRP sandwich structures with tetrahedral lattice truss cores. Compos. Part B: Eng. 43(2), 471–476 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. H. Jones, A. Campa, Fractals based on regular polygons and polyhedra, in Scientific Visualization of Physical Phenomena (Springer, 1991), pp. 299–314

    Google Scholar 

  43. K. Garanger, Versatile and structurally efficient aerial systems assembled from polyhedral rotorcraft modules. Ph.D. Thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  44. H. Hamann, Swarm Robotics: A Formal Approach, vol. 221 (Springer, 2018)

    Google Scholar 

  45. G.J. Leishman, Principles of Helicopter Aerodynamics with CD Extra (Cambridge University Press, 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  46. R. Martinez-Val, E. Perez, J. Palacin, Historical perspective of air transport productivity and efficiency (2005). ISBN: 978-1-62410-064-2. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2005-121

  47. ArduPilot Dev Team. ArduPilot documentation. Accessed 28 Aug 2022. https://ardupilot.org/ardupilot/. (Visited on 08/28/2022)

  48. J.N. Reddy, Theory and Analysis of Elastic Plates and Shells (CRC Press, 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  49. PX4 Dev Team. PX4 User Guide. Accessed 6 Sept 2021. https://docs.px4.io/main/. (Visited on 09/28/2022)

  50. M.T. Shahab, K. Garanger, E. Feron, Control of an assembly of aerial vehicles under uncertainty, in 2022 American Control Conference (ACC) (2022), pp. 514–519

    Google Scholar 

  51. M.T. Shahab, O. Wali, E.M. Feron, Automatic identification of a modular unmanned aerial system (UAS) with experimental verification, in AIAA SCITECH 2023 Forum (2023), p. 2160

    Google Scholar 

  52. K. Garanger, J. Epps, E. Feron, Modeling and experimental validation of a fractal tetrahedron uas assembly, in IEEE Aerospace Conference (IEEE, 2020), pp. 1–11

    Google Scholar 

  53. J. Epps, K. Garanger, E. Feron, Wake interactions of a tetrahedron quadcopter, in 2020 International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems (ICUAS) (IEEE, 2020), pp. 1852–1859

    Google Scholar 

  54. J.T. Epps et al., An empirical analysis of the wake interactions of a novel multi-agent UAS, in AIAA SCITECH 2022 Forum (2022), p. 0280

    Google Scholar 

  55. J.T. Epps, Rotor-rotor interactions in the design of unmanned aerial systems. Ph.D. Thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  56. O. Wali, M.T. Shahab, E. Feron, A non-planar assembly of modular tetrahedral-shaped aerial robots, in 2023 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) (2023), to appear

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This book chapter was written by Bilal Maassarani based on the input, works and publications of all the authors. Section 5.1 was written by Mohamad T. Shahab and edited by Bilal. All research done by the authors and presented in this work was supervised by Professor Eric Feron. The authors are grateful for the help and support received from numerous entities including sponsors, colleagues, peers, friends and family. Special thanks for Thanakorn Khamvilai and Kuat Telegenov.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bilal Maassarani .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Maassarani, B., Epps, J., Garanger, K., Shahab, M.T., Wali, O., Feron, E. (2023). Tetrahedral and Dodecahedral UASs, Structured Designs. In: Abdelkader, M., Koubaa, A. (eds) Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Applications: Challenges and Trends. Synthesis Lectures on Intelligent Technologies. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-32037-8_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics