Skip to main content

Social Justice as a Field

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of the Sociology of Morality, Volume 2

Part of the book series: Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research ((HSSR))

Abstract

This chapter proposes a field theory approach to morality and offers analysis of contemporary social justice as a moral field. Unlike moral formalism or moral background theory, moral field theory provides the sociology of morality a way of theorizing morality as objective while avoiding the philosophical tangle of realism and relativism. Moral field theory puts the onus on the construction of objective possibilities for moral belief and action, as moral fields emerge from an accumulated history and are produced and reproduced by socially constructive (orienting) loops between expectations and chances. As a field, morality is not subjective, neither is it conventionally group-based or directed by solidarity concerns; this allows it to assume a variety of forms capable of creating their own distinctive common sense. Moral field theory provides a framework that can account for morality as sui generis and thus it offers an at least partial affirmation of the intuition that history (“the arc of the moral universe”) can bend toward justice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Bourdieu (1983: 315) takes Michel Foucault to task on this point. Foucault’s focus on “discourse” is relational but “refuses to consider the field of prises the position in itself and for itself” or the fact that relations are consequential only as they shape more or less probable action (“position-takings”). Only a field theory can explain that.

References

  • Abend, G. (2014). The moral background. Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Agar, J. (2008). What happened in the sixties? British Journal for the History of Science, 41, 567–600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, T. (2004). The pursuit of fairness: A history of affirmative action. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, J. (2006). The Civil Sphere. Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, E. (2002). Forging gay identities: Organizing sexuality in San Francisco, 1950-1994. University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, E. (2017). The sexual politics of the ‘New Abolitionism’. Differences, 18, 128151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berrey, E. (2014). The enigma of diversity: The language of race and the limits of racial justice. University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beveridge, W. (1942). Social insurance and allied services. Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn, R. (1990). The overthrow of colonial slavery. Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackstone, W. (1765–1770/1916). Commentaries on the Laws of England. Callaghan and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boltanski, L. (2002). The left after May 1968 and the longing for total revolution. Thesis Eleven, 69, 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boltanski, L. (2012). Love and justice as competences. Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boltanski, L., & Thevenot, L. (2006). On justification: Economies of worth. Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bonilla-Silva, E. (2015). The structure of racism in color-blind, ‘post-racial’ America. American Behavioral Scientist, 59, 1358–1376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1973). Three forms of theoretical knowledge. Social Science Information, 12, 53–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1979). Symbolic power. Critique of Anthropology, 79, 7785.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1983). The field of cultural production; or the economic world reversed. Poetics, 12, 311356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1991). The peculiar history of scientific reason. Sociological Forum, 6, 3–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, W. (1993). Wounded attachments. Political Theory, 21, 390410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. (2000). Appearances aside. California Law Review, 88, 55–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carney, N. (2016). All lives matter, but so does race: Black lives matter and the evolving role of social media. Humanity and Society, 40, 180–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chamberlain, M., & Bernstein, A. (1992). Philanthropy and the emergence of women’s studies. Teachers College Record, 93, 556–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Childs, M. (2006). The 1812 Aponte rebellion in Cuba and the struggle against Atlantic slavery. UNC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1997). The arc of the moral universe. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 26, 91–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, P. (2010). The new politics of community. American Sociological Review, 75, 730.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: Black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 139–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43, 1241–1299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, H., Stoltz, P., & Willig, R. (2004). Recognition, redistribution and representation in global capitalist society: An interview with Nancy Fraser. Acta Sociologica, 47, 374–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, A. (2003). Are prisons obsolete? Seven Stories Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, A., & Martinez, E. (1998). Coalition building among people of color: A discussion with Angela Y. Davis and Elizabeth Martinez. In The Angela Y. Davis Reader. Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobbin, F., & Kavlev, A. (2021). The civil rights revolution at work: What went wrong. Annual Review of Sociology, 47, 281–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, M. (1986). How institutions think. Syracuse University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dromi, S. (2020). Above the fray: The red cross and the construction of the humanitarian relief sector. University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Du Bois, W. E. B. (1998/1935). Black reconstruction in America. Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, E. (1984/1893). The division of labor in society. The Free Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fiss, O. (1997). Affirmative action as a strategy of justice. Philosophy & Public Policy, 17, 37–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1971–72/2019). Penal theories and institutions. Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fourcade, M. (2016). Ordinalization. Sociological Theory, 34, 175–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, N. (2008). Abnormal justice. Critical Inquiry, 34, 393422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilmore, R. (2017). Abolition geography and the problem of innocence. In G. T. Johnson & A. Lubin (Eds.), Futures of black radicalism. Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, H. (1996). Richard Nixon and civil rights: Explaining an enigma. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 26, 93–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1979). Communication and the evolution of society. Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1988/1962). The structural transformation of the public sphere. MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houston, D., & Pulido, L. (2002). The work of performativity: Staging social justice at the University of Southern California. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 20, 401–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, J. (1993). The Affirmative Action/Quota Issue: Back to the Future in the Year 2000? University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review, 15, 361–381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamali, E. (2019). Felony and the guilty mind in medieval England. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Katznelson, I. (2005). When affirmative action was white. Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krause, M. (2018a). How fields vary. British Journal of Sociology, 69, 3–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krause, M. (2018b). The good project: Humanitarian Relief NGOs and the fragmentation of reason. University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwak, N., Gavrila, S., & Ramirez, F. (2018). Enacting diversity in American Higher Education. In Universities as agencies. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasagnerie, G. (2018). Judge and punish: The penal state on trial. Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J. (2003). What is field theory? American Journal of Sociology, 109, 1–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. (1970/1843). Critique of Hegel’s philosophy of right. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayorga, S. (2019). The white-centering logic of diversity ideology. American Behavioral Scientist, 63, 1789–1809.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayrl, D. (2013). Fields, logics and social movements: Prison abolition and the social justice field. Sociological Inquiry, 83, 286–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monk, E. (2022). Inequality without groups: Contemporary theories of categories, intersectional typicality, and the disaggregation of difference. Sociological Theory, 40, 3–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, B. (1978). Injustice: The social bases of obedience and revolt. M.E. Sharpe.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Moyn, S. (2010). The last utopia: Human rights in history. Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, K. (2001). The great transformation. Beacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed, T. (2020). Toward freedom: The case against race reductionism. Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rojas, F. (2007). From black power to black studies: How a radical social movement became an academic discipline. Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Skrentny, J. (1996). The ironies of affirmative action: Politics, culture and justice in America. University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stedman Jones, G. (2004). An end to poverty? The historical debate. Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strand, M. (2015). The genesis and structure of moral universalism: Social justice in Britain, 1834-1901. Theory and Society, 44, 537–573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strand, M., & Lizardo, O. (2022). Chance, orientation, and interpretation: Max Weber’s neglected probabilism and the future of social theory. Sociological Theory, 40, 124–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Supiot, A. (2012). The Spirit of Philadelphia: Social justice vs. the total market. Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland, N. M. (1992). The origins of the Thirty Years War and the structure of European politics. English Historical Review, 424, 587–625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tavory, I. (2011). The question of moral action: A formalist position. Sociological Theory, 29, 272–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Combahee River Collective. (1978). A black feminist statement. In Capitalist patriarchy and the case for socialist feminism. Monthly Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomasello, M. (2016). A natural history of human morality. Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Trudeau, E. (2021). The anatomy of a social justice field: The growth, collaboration, and dissonance of the modern U.S. anti-trafficking movement. Doctoral dissertation, University of Notre Dame

    Google Scholar 

  • Tufecki, Z. (2017). Twitter and tear gas: The power and fragility of networked protest. Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walzer, M. (1993). The King’s trial and the political culture of the revolution. In Regicide and revolution. Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watkins, S. (2018). Which feminisms? New Left Review, 109, 5–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, B. (1985). Ethics and the limits of philosophy. Fontana Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, E. (1994/1944). Capitalism and slavery. University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, P. (2009). The Thirty Years War: Europe’s tragedy. Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yack, B. (1986). The longing for total revolution: Philosophic sources of discontent from Rousseau to Marx and Nietzsche. University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Strand .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Strand, M. (2023). Social Justice as a Field. In: Hitlin, S., Dromi, S.M., Luft, A. (eds) Handbook of the Sociology of Morality, Volume 2 . Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-32022-4_23

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics