Skip to main content

The Validation of the COmprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity (COST) Scale in Greek Language

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
GeNeDis 2022 (GeNeDis 2022)

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the psychometric properties of the Greek version of FACIT-COST, as well as to assess the levels of financial distress of patients suffering from lung cancer in relation to their quality of life and lung cancer symptom burden. This was a cross-sectional quantitative study. A self-assessment instrument was used to gather the data. The study involved 120 lung cancer patients who were treated using chemotherapy in a day clinic of a General Hospital in Athens. Data were collected with the COST-FACIT-v2 (used to assess the patients’ financial toxicity), The 12-item Health Survey (SF-12), and functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy—Lung Symptom Index Questionnaire—7 items—version 4 (FACIT—FACT-LCS). Descriptive statistics as well as exploratory factor analysis performed all the statistical analyses, which were conducted using IBM SPSS Statistics 25 and had p-values with a significance level of 0.05. The majority of the participants were male (68.3%), married or cohabitated (81.3%), and had been diagnosed with microcell cancer (90%). The factor analysis resulted in one factor that interpreted 35% of the total variance. FACT-L (r = 0.365, p < 0.001), physical component SF-12 (r = 0.184, p = 0.045), and mental health component SF-12 (r = 0.268, p = 0.003) were positively correlated to FACIT-OST, as expected. The Greek validated COST-FACIT-v2 is a reliable tool in providing rapid assessment of cancer patients’ level of financial distress.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Deo SVS, Gowda SM, Bhoriwal S (2021) Epidemiology of cancer. In: Garg R, Bhatnagar S (eds) Textbook of onco-anesthesiology [Internet]. Springer, Singapore [cited 2021 Sep 16], pp 7–12. Available from https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0006-7_2

  2. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A et al (2021) Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 71(3):209–249

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ferlay J, Colombet M, Soerjomataram I, Parkin DM, Piñeros M, Znaor A et al (2021) Cancer statistics for the year 2020: an overview. Int J Cancer 149(4):778–789

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Tsvetkova A, Mihaylova S, Kamusheva M (2021) Social and economic burden of breast cancer in the North East region of Bulgaria. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 0(0):1–7

    Google Scholar 

  5. Tur-Sinai A, Urban D, Bentur N (2021) Out-of-pocket spending of deceased cancer patients in five European countries and Israel. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 30(2):e13372

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Goyanka R (2021) Economic and non-economic burden of cancer: a propensity score matched analysis using household health survey data of India. Cancer Res Stat Treat 4(1):29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Iragorri N, de Oliveira C, Fitzgerald N, Essue B (2021) The out-of-pocket cost burden of cancer care—a systematic literature review. Curr Oncol 28(2):1216–1248

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Rezapour A, Nargesi S, Mezginejad F, Kemmak AR, Bagherzadeh R (2021) The economic burden of cancer in Iran during 1995-2019: a systematic review. Iran J Public Health 50(1):35–45

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Lu L, Gavin A, Drummond FJ, Sharp L (2021) Cumulative financial stress as a potential risk factor for cancer-related fatigue among prostate cancer survivors. J Cancer Surviv 15(1):1–13

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Salsman JM, Danhauer SC, Moore JB, Ip EH, McLouth LE, Nightingale CL et al (2021) Systematic review of financial burden assessment in cancer: evaluation of measures and utility among adolescents and young adults and caregivers. Cancer 127(11):1739–1748

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bygrave A, Whittaker K, Paul C, Fradgley EA, Varlow M, Aranda S (2021) Australian experiences of out-of-pocket costs and financial burden following a cancer diagnosis: a systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health 18(5):2422

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Richard P, Patel N, Lu Y-C, Walker R, Younis M (2021) The financial burden of cancer on families in the United States. Int J Environ Res Public Health 18(7):3790

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Bradley CJ, Yabroff KR, Zafar SY, Shih Y-CT (2021) Time to add screening for financial hardship as a quality measure? CA Cancer J Clin 71(2):100–106

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lee J, Cagle JG (2021) Measures of financial burden for families dealing with serious illness: a systematic review and analysis. Palliat Med 35(2):280–294

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Durber K, Halkett GK, McMullen M, Nowak AK (2021) Measuring financial toxicity in Australian cancer patients—validation of the comprehensive score for financial toxicity (FACT COST) measuring financial toxicity in Australian cancer patients. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol 17(4):377–387

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. de Souza JA, Yap BJ, Wroblewski K, Blinder V, Araújo FS, Hlubocky FJ, Nicholas LH, O’Connor JM, Brockstein B, Ratain MJ, Daugherty CK, Cella D (2017) Measuring financial toxicity as a clinically relevant patient-reported outcome: the validation of the comprehensive score for financial toxicity (COST). Cancer 123(3):476–484. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.30369

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kontodimopoulos N, Pappa E, Niakas D, Tountas Y (2007) Validity of SF-12 summary scores in a Greek general population. Health Qual Life Outcomes 5:55. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-5-55

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Yount S, Beaumont J, Rosenbloom S, Cella D, Patel J, Hensing T, Jacobsen PB, Syrjala K, Abernethy AP (2012) A brief symptom index for advanced lung cancer. Clin Lung Cancer 13(1):14–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cllc.2011.03.033

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Chan DNS, Choi KC, Ng MSN et al (2021) Translation and validation of the traditional Chinese version of the comprehensive score for financial toxicity-functional assessment of chronic illness therapy (version 2). Health Qual Life Outcomes 19:17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-020-01646-z

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Dar MA, Chauhan R, Sharma KK, Trivedi V, Dhingra S, Murti K (2021) Assessing the reliability and validity of comprehensive score for financial toxicity (COST) among radiation oncology patients in India: a cross-sectional pilot study. Ecancermed Sci 15:1219. https://doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2021.1219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Robin Yabroff K, Mariotto A, Tangka F, Zhao J, Islami F, Sung H, Sherman RL, Henley SJ, Jemal A, Ward EM (2021) Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, part 2: patient economic burden associated with cancer care. JNCI: J Natl Cancer Inst 113(12):1670–1682. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djab192

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ezeife DA, Morganstein BJ, Lau S, Law JH, Le LW, Bredle J, Cella D, Doherty MK, Bradbury P, Liu G, Sacher A (2019) Financial burden among patients with lung cancer in a publically funded health care system. Clin Lung Cancer 20(4):231–236

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Chen JE, Lou VW, Jian H, Zhou Z, Yan M, Zhu J, Li G, He Y (2018) Objective and subjective financial burden and its associations with health-related quality of life among lung cancer patients. Support Care Cancer 26(4):1265–1272

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Zafar SY, McNeil RB, Thomas CM, Lathan CS, Ayanian JZ, Provenzale D (2015) Population-based assessment of cancer survivors’ financial burden and quality of life: a prospective cohort study. J Oncol Pract 11(2):145–150

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Fradelos, E.C. et al. (2023). The Validation of the COmprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity (COST) Scale in Greek Language. In: Vlamos, P. (eds) GeNeDis 2022. GeNeDis 2022. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol 1425. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-31986-0_18

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics