Abstract
The artificial intelligence industry has been essential in creating new jobs for the deployment of real-world solutions. As a result, the implementation of these new jobs involves the execution of multiple human intelligence micro-tasks, such as data labeling tasks for training machine learning models. The workers who perform those tasks, also known as crowd workers, usually are independent workers within crowdsourcing platforms. These platforms are subject to the free market, where the forces of supply and demand produce various power dynamics among stakeholders. As a result, disassociation between stakeholders often generates unbalanced power dynamics where workers are paid below minimum wage and are intimidated to keep their reputation or face termination. Within this chapter, we introduce computational techniques to audit the workplace conditions of crowd workers and design tools to address these power imbalances, as a positive and more efficient alternative for the labor conditions of crowd workers. This chapter develops these objectives through the design and evaluation of three tools in digital labor platforms: “Invisible Labor Tracker,” “Reputation Agent,” and “CultureFit,” which we describe below. We will demonstrate the sustainability of systems that point to a future where AI can be used to audit and address power imbalances in the workplace.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
Bibliography
Baer, T., & Kamalnath, V. (2017). Controlling machine-learning algorithms and their biases. McKinsey Insights.
Benyon, D., & Macaulay, C. (2002). Scenarios and the hci-se design problem. Interacting with Computers, 14(4), 397–405.
Borromeo, R., Laurent, T., Toyama, M., & Amer-Yahia, S. (2017). Fairness and transparency in crowdsourcing. International Conference on Extending Database Technology (EDBT).
Cockton, G. (2004). Value-centred hci. Proceedings of the third Nordic conference on Human-computer interaction, 149–160.
Daly, T. M., & Nataraajan, R. (2015). Swapping bricks for clicks: Crowdsourcing longitudinal data on amazon turk. Journal of Business Research, 68(12), 2603–2609.
Dellarocas, C. (2010). Online reputation systems: How to design one that does what you need. MIT Sloan management review, 51(3), 33.
Difallah, D., Filatova, E., & Ipeirotis, P. (2018). Demographics and dynamics of mechanical turk workers. Proceedings of the eleventh ACM international conference on web search and data mining, 135–143.
Eitel-Porter, R. (2021). Beyond the promise: Implementing ethical ai. AI and Ethics, 1(1), 73–80.
Gira, M., Zhang, R., & Lee, K. (2022). Debiasing pre-trained language models via efficient fine- tuning. In: Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Language Technology for Equality, Diversity and Inclusion, (pp. 59–69).
Gray, M. L., & Suri, S. (2019). Ghost work: How to stop silicon valley from building a new global underclass. Eamon Dolan Books.
Hall, E. T., & Hall, E. T. (1989). The dance of life: The other dimension of time. Anchor.
Hochschild, A. R. (2016). Invisible labor: Hidden work in the contemporary world. Univ of California Press.
Jagdale, R. S., Shirsat, V. S., & Deshmukh, S. N. (2019). Sentiment analysis on product reviews using machine learning techniques. In Cognitive informatics and soft computing (pp. 639–647). Springer.
Jobin, A., Ienca, M., & Vayena, E. (2019). The global landscape of ai ethics guidelines. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1(9), 389–399.
Kaufman, C. F., Lane, P. M., & Lindquist, J. D. (1991). Exploring more than 24 hours a day: A preliminary investigation of polychronic time use. Journal of Consumer Research, 18(3), 392–401.
Kennedy, R., Clifford, S., Burleigh, T., Waggoner, P. D., Jewell, R., & Winter, N. J. (2020). The shape of and solutions to the mturk quality crisis. Political Science Research and Methods, 8(4), 614–629.
Krapivsky, P. L., & Redner, S. (2010). Wealth distributions in asset exchange models. arXiv preprint arXiv:1006.4595.
Lehdonvirta, V., Hjorth, I., Barnard, H., & Graham, M. (2021). Global earnings disparities in re- mote platform work: Liabilities of origin? In Work and labour relations in global platform capitalism. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Mattarelli, E., Bertolotti, F., & Incerti, V. (2015). The interplay between organizational poly- chronicity, multitasking behaviors and organizational identification: A mixed-methods study in knowledge intensive organizations. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 79, 6–19.
McCrickard, D. S., Czerwinski, M., & Bartram, L. (2003). Introduction: Design and evaluation of notification user interfaces. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 58(5), 509–514.
Moon, S., Park, Y., & Kim, Y. S. (2014). The impact of text product reviews on sales. European Journal of Marketing.
Nardon, L., & Steers, R. M. (2006). Navigating the culture theory jungle: Divergence and con- vergence in models of national culture. Vlerick Leuven Gent Management School, the Autonomous Management School of Ghent University and Katholieke Universiteit Leuven: Vlerick Leuven Gent Working Paper Series, 38.
Nardon, L., & Steers, R. M. (2009). The culture theory jungle: Divergence and convergence in models of national culture. Cambridge Handbook of Culture, Organizations, and Work, 3–22.
Pelaez, A., Quiroz, A., & Parashar, M. (2016). Dynamic adaptation of policies using machine learning. In 2016 16th IEEE/ACM International symposium on cluster, cloud and grid computing (CCGrid), (pp. 501–510).
Pike, A., Rodriguez-Pose, A., & Tomaney, J. (2014). Local and regional development in the global north and south. Progress in Development Studies, 14(1), 21–30.
Rosson, M. B., & Carroll, J. M. (2002). Usability engineering: Scenario-based development of human- computer interaction. Morgan Kaufmann.
Sahami Shirazi, A., Henze, N., Dingler, T., Pielot, M., Weber, D., & Schmidt, A. (2014). Large- scale assessment of mobile notifications. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, (pp. 3055–3064).
Salminen, J., Jung, S.-g., & Jansen, B. J. (2021). Suggestions for online user studies. International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, 127–146.
Savage, S., Chiang, C. W., Saito, S., Toxtli, C., & Bigham, J. (2020). Becoming the super turker: Increasing wages via a strategy from high earning workers. Proceedings of the Web Conference, 2020, 1241–1252.
Schiller, Z., & Davis, C. (2017). Taxes and the on-demand economy. Institute on Taxation & Economic Policy.
Stevens, J. L., Jones, C. L. E., & Breazeale, M. (2021). Redacted: The impact of negative online review censorship. Journal of Product & Brand Management.
Sundararajan, A. (2017). The sharing economy: The end of employment and the rise of crowd-based capitalism. MIT press.
Toxtli, C., Monroy-Herna´ndez, A., & Cranshaw, J. (2018). Understanding chatbot-mediated task management. In: Proceedings of the 2018 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1–6).
Vakharia, D., & Lease, M. (2015). Beyond mechanical turk: An analysis of paid crowd work platforms. Proceedings of the iConference.
Wright, A. P., Wang, Z. J., Park, H., Guo, G., Sperrle, F., El-Assady, M., Endert, A., Keim, D., & Chau, D. H. (2020). A comparative analysis of industry human-ai interaction guide- lines. arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.11761.
Zhang, J., Oh, Y. J., Lange, P., Yu, Z., Fukuoka, Y., et al. (2020). Artificial intelligence chatbot behavior change model for designing artificial intelligence chatbots to promote physical activity and a healthy diet. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 22(9), e22845.
Acknowledgements
This work was partially supported by NSF grant FW-Htf-19541
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Toxtli, C., Savage, S. (2023). Designing AI Tools to Address Power Imbalances in Digital Labor Platforms. In: Krüger, M., De Castro Leal, D., Randall, D., Tolmie, P. (eds) Torn Many Ways. Human–Computer Interaction Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-31642-5_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-31642-5_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-31641-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-31642-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)