Skip to main content

“Would You Say, I Can Get My Money Back?”

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Torn Many Ways

Part of the book series: Human–Computer Interaction Series ((HCIS))

Abstract

In this chapter, I try to describe the experience, as someone new to research, of engaging with people who had been, in various ways, defrauded. I was not prepared for the emotional toll it had on me, nor for the fact that I was pretty much left to my own devices when navigating my way through interactions with a range of people. I was surprised and, to be honest, a little dismayed by the trust they placed in me as they laid bare some painful experiences.

This chapter is dedicated to the participants of my study, who bravely shared their sorrows, pain and embarrassment with me.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Akama, Y., Anich, J., Avendano Franco, A., Choi, J., Fennessy, L., Foley, M., & Tan, L. (2022, August). Why are we here? A reflexive story of decolonising. In Proceedings of the Participatory Design Conference 2022-Volume 1 (pp. 26–35).

    Google Scholar 

  • Beatty, A. (2010). How did it feel for you? Emotion, narrative, and the limits of ethnography. American Anthropologist, 112(3), 430–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergmann, J. R. (1993). Alarmiertes verstehen: Kommunikation in feuerwehrnotrufen. Wirklichkeit im Deutungsprozeß. Verstehen und Methoden in den Kultur-und Sozialwissenschaften, 283–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackman, S. J. (2007). Hidden ethnography’: Crossing emotional borders in qualitative accounts of young people’s lives. Sociology, 41(4), 699–716.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blum, S., Brow, M., & Silver, R. C. (2012). Coping. Encyclopedia of Human Behavior 596–601.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. (1992). Réponses (Vol. 4). Paris: Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, T., & Whitty, M. T. (2014). The online dating romance scam: C auses and consequences of victimhood. Psychology, Crime & Law, 20(3), 261–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burawoy, M. (1998). The Extended Case Method. Sociological Theory, 16(1), 4–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Button, M., & Cross, C. (2017). Cyber frauds, scams and their victims. Taylor & Francis.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Button, M., Lewis, C., & Tapley, J. (2014). Not a victimless crime: The impact of fraud on individual victims and their families. Security Journal, 27, 36–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Button, M., Lewis, C., & Tapley, J. (2009). A better deal for fraud victims: Research into victims’ needs and experiences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clifford, J., & Marcus, G. E. (Eds.). (1986). Writing culture: the poetics and politics of ethnography: a School of American Research advanced seminar. Univ of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coffey, A. (1999). The ethnographic self. The Ethnographic Self, 1–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross, C. (2015). No laughing matter: Blaming the victim of online fraud. International Review of Victimology, 21(2), 187–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cross, C. (2013). Nobody's holding a gun to your head...: Examining current discourses surrounding victims of online fraud. In Crime, justice and social democracy: proceedings of the 2nd international conference, 2013, volume 1 (pp. 25–32). Crime and Justice Research Centre, Queensland University of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunbar, E., & Kolko, B. (2022, June). Developing critical reflexivity in global health. In Designing interactive systems conference (pp. 42–44).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fish, B., & Stark, L. (2021, July). Reflexive design for fairness and other human values in formal models. In Proceedings of the 2021 AAAI/ACM conference on AI, ethics, and society (pp. 89–99).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilmore, S., & Kenny, K. (2015). Work-worlds colliding: Self-reflexivity, power and emotion in organizational ethnography. Human Relations, 68(1), 55–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. (1988). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3), 575–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harding, S. G. (Ed.). (2004). The feminist standpoint theory reader: Intellectual and political controversies. Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunsinger, J. (2005). Reflexivity in e-science: Virtual communities and research institutions. ACM SIGGROUP Bulletin, 25(2), 38–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • May, T., & Perry, B. (2010). Social research and reflexivity. Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pan, Y. (2021). Reflexivity of account, professional vision, and computer-supported cooperative work: Working in the maritime domain. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 5(CSCW2), 1–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pihkala, S., & Karasti, H. (2016, August). Reflexive engagement: enacting reflexivity in design and for'participation in plural’. In Proceedings of the 14th Participatory Design Conference: Full Papers-Volume 1 (pp. 21–30).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rode, J. A. (2011, May). Reflexivity in digital anthropology. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 123–132).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schon jeder Fünfte hat Betrug beim Online-Shopping erlebt | Bitkom e.V. (2020). https://www.bitkom.org/Presse/Presseinformation/Schon-jeder-Fuenfte-hat-Betrug-beim-Online-Shopping-erlebt. Accessed: 2023-2-17.

  • Smith, D. E. (1987). The everyday world as problematic: A feminist sociology. University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spalek, B. (2017). Crime victims: Theory, policy and practice. Bloomsbury Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Maanen, J. (2011). Tales of the field: On writing ethnography. University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitty, M. T., & Buchanan, T. (2016). The online dating romance scam: The psychological impact on victims–both financial and non-financial. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 16(2), 176–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fatemeh Alizadeh .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Alizadeh, F. (2023). “Would You Say, I Can Get My Money Back?”. In: Krüger, M., De Castro Leal, D., Randall, D., Tolmie, P. (eds) Torn Many Ways. Human–Computer Interaction Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-31642-5_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-31642-5_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-31641-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-31642-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics