Abstract
Master’s Entry to the Profession of Nursing (MEPN) programs have, for over 20 years now, been an option for students interested in taking the registered nurse (RN) licensing exam in the course of attaining a master’s degree. Developed for those with either a bachelor’s degree or a graduate degree in a discipline other than nursing, entry-level master’s degrees are also referred to as generic or accelerated programs. These offerings usually take 18–36 months to finish, with baccalaureate-level content and initial RN licensure typically completed within the first year. Paced for students who have shown an ability to succeed at a 4-year college or university, such programs often produce Clinical Nurse Leaders while increasing diversity within the RN workforce and enabling more practitioners to earn advanced degrees. The IOM 2011 report, “The Future of Nursing” [1], challenged the nursing profession to, by 2020, increase the number of nurses with a bachelor’s degree to 80%, while doubling the number of nurses holding a doctorate—training that would, in the latter case, prepare these individuals to assume faculty positions in newly proposed accelerated training initiatives, such as MEPN programs. While such goals would seem to encourage programs to actively pursue such potential students, many schools of nursing have not tailored their curricular offerings to meet the needs and expectations of this richly experienced population [2].
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Institute of Medicine, Committee on the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Initiative on the Future of Nursing, at the Institute of Medicine. The future of nursing: leading change, advancing health. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2011. https://doi.org/10.17226/12956.
McNiesh SG. The lived experience of students in an accelerated nursing program: intersecting factors that influence experiential learning. J Nurs Educ. 2011;50(4):197–203. https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20101029-03.
Everett B, Salamonson Y, Trajkovski S, Fernandez R. Demographic and academic-related differences between standard-entry and graduate-entry nursing students: a prospective correlational survey. Nurse Educ Today. 2013;33(7):709–13.
DeWitty VP, Huerta CG, Downing CA. New careers in nursing: optimizing diversity and student success for the future of nursing. J Prof Nurs. 2016;32(5S):S4–13.
Kershaw B. The future of nursing—leading change, advancing Health The future of nursing—leading change, advancing health. Nurs Stand. 2011;26(7):31.
Tabloski PA. Setting the stage for success: mentoring and leadership development. J Prof Nurs. 2016;32(5S):S54–8.
Moore LW, Kelly CW, Schmidt S, Miller M, Reynolds M. Second degree prelicensure master’s graduates: what attracts them to nursing, their views on the profession, and their contributions. J Prof Nurs. 2011;27(1):19–27.
Raines DA. What attracts second-degree students to a career in nursing? Online J Issues Nurs. 2010;16(1):8.
McKenna L, Vanderheide R, Brooks I. Is graduate entry education a solution to increasing numbers of men in nursing? Nurse Educ Pract. 2016;17:74–7.
United States Census Bureau. QuickFacts: United States. 2015 [cited 2021 Mar 17]. Available from: https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/US/PST045219.2015.
Pellico LH, Terrill E, White P, Rico J. Integrative review of graduate entry programs in nursing. J Nurs Educ. 2012;51(1):29–37.
Accelerated baccalaureate and master’s degrees in nursing. Aacnnursing.org. [cited 2021 Mar 26]. Available from: https://www.aacnnursing.org/Nursing-Education-Programs/Accelerated-Programs.
Accelerated programs: The fast track to careers in nursing. Aacnnursing.org. [cited 2021 Mar 26]. Available from: https://www.aacnnursing.org/nursing-education/accelerated-programs/fast-track.
Brewer CS, Kovner CT, Poornima S, Fairchild S, Kim H, Djukic M. A comparison of second-degree baccalaureate and traditional-baccalaureate new graduate RNs: implications for the workforce. J Prof Nurs. 2009;25(1):5–14.
McNiesh SG. The lived experience of students in an accelerated nursing program: intersecting factors that influence experiential learning. J Nurs Educ. 2011;50(4):197–203. https://doi.org/10.3928/01484384-20101029-03.
Alexander E. Purposeful simulation role assignment. Clin Simul Nurs. 2020;48:1–7.
El-Banna MM, Tebbenhoff B, Whitlow M, Wyche KF. Motivated strategies for learning in accelerated second-degree nursing students. Nurse Educ. 2017;42(6):308–12.
Bowie BH, Carr KC. From coach to colleague: adjusting pedagogical approaches and attitudes in accelerated nursing programs. J Prof Nurs. 2013;29(6):395–401.
Cruz FA, Farr S, Klakovich MD, Esslinger P. Facilitating the career transition of second-career students into professional nursing. Nurs Educ Perspect. 2013;34(1):12–7.
Brown J, Kelly MA, McGough S, Fagence A, Bosco AM, Mason J, et al. The impact of simulation on graduate entry master’s students’ confidence to provide safe patient care: a longitudinal study. Clin Simul Nurs. 2020;45:6–15.
Sullivan N, Swoboda SM, Breymier T, Lucas L, Sarasnick J, Rutherford-Hemming T, et al. Emerging evidence toward a 2:1 clinical to simulation ratio: a study comparing the traditional clinical and simulation settings. Clin Simul Nurs. 2019;30:34–41.
Gerzina HA, Stovsky E. Standardized patient assessment of learners in medical simulation. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2020.
Christoffersen JE. Teaching accelerated second-degree nursing students: educators from across the United States share their wisdom: teaching ASD students. Nurs Forum. 2017;52(2):111–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/nuf.12174.
Rutherford-Hemming T. Simulation methodology in nursing education and adult learning theory. Adult Learn. 2012;23(3):129–37.
Clapper TC. Beyond knowles: what those conducting simulation need to know about adult learning theory. Clin Simul Nurs. 2010;6(1):e7–14.
Rainbow JG, Steege LM. Transition to practice experiences of first- and second-career nurses: a mixed-methods study. J Clin Nurs. 2019;28(7–8):1193–204.
Hoffart N, McCoy TP, Lewallen LP, Thorpe S. Differences in gender-related profile characteristics, perceptions, and outcomes of accelerated second-degree nursing students. J Prof Nurs. 2019;35(2):93–100.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Nichols, A., Van Auker, L.L. (2023). Using Simulation with Master’s Entry to the Profession of Nursing Students (MEPN). In: Kutzin, J.M., Waxman, K., Lopez, C.M., Kiegaldie, D. (eds) Comprehensive Healthcare Simulation: Nursing. Comprehensive Healthcare Simulation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-31090-4_23
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-31090-4_23
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-31089-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-31090-4
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)