Skip to main content

Are Stay-at-Home Dads Real Men? The Potential of Critical Media Literacy to Enhance Teacher Training

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Gender, Sexuality and the UN's SDGs

Part of the book series: Sustainable Development Goals Series ((SDGS))

  • 175 Accesses

Abstract

Recent events in the media around the place of women in Higher Education and in employment heighten the need to revisit issues around gender across the world. Along with international news coverage, gender issues are reflected in, and influenced by, media texts such as tv programmes. These texts carry with them discourses that may well influence behaviours in society more widely. Beck et al. (Beck, Lash and Giddens Reflexive modernization: Politics, tradition and aesthetics in the modern social order. Stanford University Press, 1994) suggested that individuals come to understand the social conditions of their existence and can then change them accordingly. This is a very optimistic view and perhaps avoids the very real inhibitors when subjects step outside of gendered expectations at work and at home. The work of Lois McNay (1999) and Lisa Adkins and Beverley Skeggs (2004) will be drawn on to challenge the ease of accessibility of choice over roles in certain domains, in this case parenting and employment. In recent popular culture there has been considerable interest in gender-based issues and often the use of comedic strategies can be useful in foregrounding some prevalent discourses around levels of agency for both sexes.

The chapter will argue that contemporary constructions of parenting and in particular the ‘stay-at-home father’ are presented in very specific ways. In doing so we get a glimpse into deeper debates about how masculinity and femininity are constructed when the roles taken up challenge the normative expectations that have been prevalent over time. The chapter will critically analyse the British series Motherland and the American equivalent Working Moms to show how ideas around reflexive modernity assumes as Adkins and Skeggs (2004) notes the assumption that subjects exist outside of social worlds and therefore make objective choices about what they can and cannot do. The chapter concludes with a consideration of the need for gender equality elements to be placed firmly within international agendas like sustainability development goals to ensure more equitable choices going forward.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adkins, L., & Skeggs, B. (Eds.). (2004). Feminism After Bourdieu (pp. 191–210). Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvermann, D. E., & Hagood, M. C. (2000). Critical Media Literacy: Research, Theory, and Practice in “New Times”. The Journal of Educational Research, 93(3), 193–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ariffin, F. N., & Ng, T. F. (2020). Understanding and Opinion on Sustainable Development Among Youths in Higher Educational Institutions in Penang, Malaysia. Social Indicators Research, 147(2), 421–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, R. (1997). Higher Education: A Critical Business. Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U., Giddens, A., & Lash, S. (1994). Reflexive Modernization: Politics, Tradition and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order. Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bianchi, S. M., Sayer, L. C., Milkie, M. A., & Robinson, J. P. (2012). Housework: Who Did, Does or Will Do It, and How Much Does It Matter? Social Forces, 91(1), 55–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosson, J. K., Taylor, J. N., & Prewitt-Freilino, J. L. (2006). Gender Role Violations and Identity Misclassification: The Roles of Audience and Actor Variables. Sex Roles, 55(1), 13–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (2000). Pascalian Meditations. Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandth, B., & Kvande, E. (2009). Gendered or Gender-Neutral Care Politics for Fathers? The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 624, 177–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. (2002). Gender Trouble. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. (2011). Bodies That Matter: On the Discursive Limits of Sex. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • CAST. (2011). Universal Design for Learning Guidelines Version 2.0.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chanock, K. (2000). Comments on Essays: Do Students Understand What Tutors Write? Teaching in Higher Education, 5(1), 95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crenshaw, K. W. (1991). Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence Against Women of Color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Silva, J., & Thulemark, M. (2022). Can You Break Through a Cement Ceiling? – Female Chefs’ Possibilities for a Career in the Sri Lankan Culinary Industry. Anatolia, 33(3), 507–510.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doucet, A., & Merla, L. (2007). Stay-at-Home Fathering: A Strategy for Balancing Work and Home in Canadian and Belgian Families. Community, Work and Family, 10(4), 455–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elam, A., & Terjesen, S. (2010). Gendered Institutions and Cross-National Patterns of Business Creation for Men and Women. The European Journal of Development Research, 22(3), 331–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, C. D., & Diekman, A. B. (2009). On Motivated Role Selection: Gender Beliefs, Distant Goals, and Career Interest. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 33(2), 235–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Facione, P. A. (2011). Critical Thinking: What It Is and Why It Counts. Insight Assessment, 2007(1), 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, N. (2000). Rethinking Recognition. New Left Review, 3, 107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freund, D., & Hernandez-Maskivker, G. (2021). Women Managers in Tourism: Associations for Building a Sustainable World. Tourism Management Perspectives, 38, 100820.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gee, J. P. (2011). How to Do Discourse Analysis. Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, R. (2009). Beyond the ‘Sexualization of Culture’ Thesis: An Intersectional Analysis of ‘Sixpacks’, ‘Midriffs’ and ‘Hot Lesbians’ in Advertising. Sexualities, 12(2), 137–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, K. (2020). A Critical Analysis of Masculinity During Mentoring in Contemporary Schools. In Gender Equality in Changing Times (pp. 83–106). Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Goodsell, T. L. (2005). Fatherhood and the Social Organization of Space: An Essay in Subjective Geography. Situated Fathering. A Focus on Physical and Social Spaces, pp. 27–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, A., & Milner, S. (2011). What Is “New” About Fatherhood? The Social Construction of Fatherhood in France and the UK. Men and Masculinities, 14(5), 588–606.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haasler, S. R. (2014). The Impact of Learning on Women’s Labour Market Transitions. Research in Comparative and International Education, 9(3), 354–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heilman, M. E., & Okimoto, T. G. (2007). Why Are Women Penalized for Success at Male Tasks?: The Implied Communality Deficit. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(1), 81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heleta, S., & Bagus, T. (2021). Sustainable Development Goals and Higher Education: Leaving Many Behind. Higher Education, 81, 163–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoyt, C. L., & Murphy, S. E. (2016). Managing to Clear the Air: Stereotype Threat, Women, and Leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 27(3), 387–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Humbert, A. L., Kelan, E., & Van den Brink, M. (2019). The Perils of Gender Beliefs for Men Leaders as Change Agents for Gender Equality. European Management Review, 16(4), 1143–1157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Labour Office. (2016). Women at Work: Trends 2016. ILO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iyer, R., & Luke, C. (2011). Gender Representations in the Media and the Importance of Critical Media Literacy. In S. Tozer, A. M. Henry, P. G. Price, M. B. Geiner, & B. P. Gallegos (Eds.), Handbook of Research in the Social Foundations of Education (pp. 434–449). Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janks, H. (2010). Doing Critical Literacy: Texts and Activities for Teachers and Students. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, M. (2021). https://inews.co.uk/opinion/motherland-bbc-stay-at-home-dad-kevin-damaging-cliche-1024843

  • Johns, M. L. (2013). Breaking the Glass Ceiling: Structural, Cultural, and Organizational Barriers Preventing Women from Achieving Senior and Executive Positions. Perspectives in Health Information Management, (Winter).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kee, H. J. (2006). Glass Ceiling Or Sticky Floor? Exploring the Australian Gender Pay Gap. Economic Record, 82(259), 408–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelan, E. K., & Wratil, P. (2018). Post-heroic Leadership, Tempered Radicalism and Senior Leaders as Change Agents for Gender Equality. European Management Review, 15(1), 5–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, D. M., & Currie, D. H. (2021). Beyond Stereotype Analysis in Critical Media Literacy: Case Study of Reading and Writing Gender in Pop Music Videos. Gender and Education, 33(6), 676–691.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimmel, M. S., & Aronson, A. (Eds.). (2004). Men and Masculinities: AJ (Vol. 1). Abc-Clio.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kopnina, H. (2017). Future Scenarios for Sustainability Education. In P. B. Corcoran, A. Wals, & J. Weakland (Eds.), Envisioning Futures for Environmental and Sustainability Education. Wageningen Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, K. Z., & Kramer, A. (2016). At-Home Father Families in the United States: Gender Ideology, Human Capital, and Unemployment. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 78, 1315–1331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamb, M. (Ed.). (2004). The Role of the Father in Child Development. Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leal Filho, W., Jin Wu, Y., Brandli, L. L., Avila, L. V., Azeiteiro, U. M., Caeiro, S., & Madruga, L. R. R. G. (2017). Identifying and Overcoming Obstacles to the Implementation of Sustainable Development at Universities. Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences, 14(1), 93–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Littler, J. (2013). The Rise of the “Yummy Mummy”: Popular Conservatism and the Neoliberal Maternal in Contemporary British Culture. Communication, Culture & Critique, 6(2), 227–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Littler, J. (2020). Mothers Behaving Badly: Chaotic Hedonism and the Crisis of Neoliberal Social Reproduction. Cultural Studies, 34(4), 499–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marks, L., & Palkovitz, R. (2004). American Fatherhood Types: The Good, the Bad, and the Uninterested. Fathering, 2(2), 113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massey, D. (2013). Space, Place and Gender. John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattila, H. (2020). The Social Construction of Stay-at-Home Fathering Across Everyday Spaces. Qualitative Psychology, 7(2), 185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNay, L. (1999). Gender, Habitus and the Field: Pierre Bourdieu and the Limits of Reflexivity. Theory, Culture & Society, 16(1), 95–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. H., & Land, R. (2005). Threshold Concepts and Troublesome Knowledge (2): Epistemological Considerations and a Conceptual Framework for Teaching and Learning. Higher Education, 49(3), 373–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mezirow, J. (1997). Transformative Learning; Theory to Practice. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 74, 5–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morales-Doyle, D. (2015). Science Education as a Catalyst for Social Change? Justice-Centered Pedagogy in Secondary Chemistry. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Illinois Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Navarro Astor, E., Román-Onsalo, M., & Infante-Perea, M. (2017). Women’s Career Development in the Construction Industry Across 15 Years: Main Barriers. Journal of Engineering Design and Technology, 15(2), 199–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. PISA. (2009). Assessment Framework: Key Competencies in Reading, Mathematics and Science; OECD Publishing, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oswald, D. L. (2008). Gender Stereotypes and Women’s Reports of Liking and Ability in Traditionally Masculine and Feminine Occupations. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32(2), 196–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phelan, J. E., Moss-Racusin, C. A., & Rudman, L. A. (2008). Competent Yet Out in the Cold: Shifting Criteria for Hiring Reflect Backlash Toward Agentic Women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32(4), 406–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pleck, E. H. (2004). Two Dimensions of Fatherhood: A History of the Good Dad-Bad Dad Complex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pritchard, A., Morgan, N., & Sedgley, D. (2002). In search of Lesbian Space? The Experience of Manchester’s Gay Village. Leisure Studies, 21(2), 105–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Probst, L., Bardach, L., Kamusingize, D., Templer, N., Ogwali, H., Owamani, A., Mulumba, L., Onwonga, R., & Adugna, B. T. (2019). A Transformative University Learning Experience Contributes to Sustainability Attitudes, Skills and Agency. Journal of Cleaner Production, 232, 648–656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rehel, E. M. (2014). When Dad Stays Home Too: Paternity Leave, Gender, and Parenting. Gender and Society, 28(1), 110–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reza, M. I. H. (2016). Sustainability in Higher Education: Perspectives of Malaysian Higher Education System. SAGE Open, 6(3).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rochlen, A. B., McKelley, R. A., & Whittaker, T. A. (2010). Stay-At-Home Fathers’ Reasons for Entering the Role and Stigma Experiences: A Preliminary Report. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 11, 279–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth-Cohen, O., Kanevska, H. S., & Eisend, M. (2022). Gender Roles in Online Advertising. Journal of Gender Studies, 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudman, L. A., & Glick, P. (2001). Prescriptive Gender Stereotypes and Backlash Toward Agentic Women. Journal of Social Issues, 57(4), 743–762.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudman, L. A., Moss-Racusin, C. A., Glick, P., & Phelan, J. E. (2012). Reactions to Vanguards: Advances in Backlash Theory. In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 45, pp. 167–227).

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J. (1992). Experience. In J. Butler & J. W. Scott (Eds.), Feminists Theorize the Political. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiel, C., Smith, N., & Cantarello, E. (2020). Aligning Campus Strategy with the SDGs: An Institutional Case Study. In Universities as Living Labs for Sustainable Development (pp. 11–27). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Spanierman, L. B., Oh, E., Poteat, V. P., Hund, A. R., McClair, V. L., Beer, A. M., & Clarke, A. M. (2008). White University Students’ Responses to Societal Racism: A Qualitative Investigation. The Counseling Psychologist, 36, 839–870.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stamarski, C. S., & Son Hing, L. S. (2015). Gender Inequalities in the Workplace: The Effects of Organizational Structures, Processes, Practices, and Decision Makers’ Sexism. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, E. (2015). Understanding Discursive Barriers to Involved Fatherhood: The Case of Australian Stay-at-Home Fathers. Journal of Family Studies, 21(1), 22–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sunderland, J. (2000). Baby Entertainer, Bumbling Assistant and Line Manager: Discourses of Fatherhood in Parentcraft Texts. Discourse & Society, 11(2), 249–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sustainable Development Solutions Network (SDSN). (2020). Accelerating Education for the SDGs in Universities: A Guide for Universities, Colleges, and Tertiary and Higher Education Institutions. Report, Sustainable Development Solutions Network, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornton, M., & Bagust, J. (2007). The Gender Trap: Flexible Work in Corporate Legal Practice (Vol. 45, p. 773). Osgoode Hall Law Journal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tosi, P. (2011). Thinking About What We See: Using Media Literacy to Examine Images of African Americans on Television. Black History Bulletin, 74, 13–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Triventi, M. (2013). The Gender Wage Gap and Its Institutional Context: A Comparative Analysis of European Graduates. Work, Employment and Society, 27(4), 563–580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, I. (2008). “Chav mum chav scum” Class Disgust in Contemporary Britain. Feminist Media Studies, 8(1), 17–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WCED, S. W. S. (1987). World Commission on Environment and Development. Our Common Future, 17(1), 1–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, I. M. (1997). Intersecting Voices: Dilemmas of Gender, Political Philosophy, and Policy. Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kim Gilligan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Gilligan, K. (2023). Are Stay-at-Home Dads Real Men? The Potential of Critical Media Literacy to Enhance Teacher Training. In: Dalton, D., Smith, A. (eds) Gender, Sexuality and the UN's SDGs. Sustainable Development Goals Series. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-31046-1_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-31046-1_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-31045-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-31046-1

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics