Skip to main content

Hate, Disgust, and Restrictive Eating: Abusive Comments on Body-Inclusive Posts on Instagram

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Gender, Sexuality and the UN's SDGs

Part of the book series: Sustainable Development Goals Series ((SDGS))

Abstract

This chapter looks at hate comments on the social media app Instagram. The focus is on body shaming comments made towards body neutral/confident social media activists and influencers. This chapter adds to the growing body of work on social media activism and online hate. In alignment with the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goal 5 ‘achieving gender equality and empowering women’, this chapter shows the extend and severity of the online hate women face for showing and loving their bodies, which do not meet the societal ideal of a thin white body. Target 5.1 of Goal 5 states to ‘eliminate all forms of violence against women and girls in the public and private spheres’ and this chapter reveals how violent social media can be for women. As body image is linked to health and well-being, this also links with SDG Goal 3. This chapter uses data collected from the app Instagram and looks at social movements and social media campaigns such as the body positive movement. The methodology which is employed is social media critical discourse studies, which is a newly evolved branch of critical discourse studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Are, C. (2020). How Instagram’s Algorithm Is Censoring Women and Vulnerable Users But Helping Online Abusers. Feminist Media Studies, 20(5), 741–744.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banet-Weiser, S. (2018). Empowered: Popular Feminism and Popular Misogyny. Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • BBC Bitesize. (n.d.). From New York to Instagram: The History of the Body Positivity Movement. The history of the body positivity movement – BBC Bitesize, Retrieved July 17, 2021.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beat Eating Disorders. (n.d.). How Many People Have an Eating Disorder in the UK? Retrieved July 16, 2022, from https://www.beateatingdisorders.org.uk/get-information-and-support/about-eating-disorders/how-many-people-eating-disorder-uk/

  • Bouvier, G. (2020). From ‘Echo Chambers’ to ‘Chaos Chambers’: Discursive Coherence and Contradiction in the #MeToo Twitter Feed. Critical Discourse Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2020.1822898

  • Bouvier, G., & Machin, D. (2018). Critical Discourse Analysis and the Challenges and Opportunities of Social Media. Review of Communication, 18(3), 178–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/15358593.2018.1479881

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S. (2022). Get Rich or Lie Trying. Atlantic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Business of Apps. (2022). Instagram Revenue and Usage Statistics. Instagram Revenue and Usage Statistics (2022) - Business of Apps. Retrieved July 17, 2022.

    Google Scholar 

  • Center for Countering Digital Hate. (2022). Hidden Hate. Hidden Hate | CCDH (counterhate.com). Retrieved July 17, 2022.

  • Chakraborti, N., Garland, J., & Hardy, S. (2014). The Leicester Hate Crime Project. Findings and Conclusions. University of Leicester. Retrieved July 17, 2022, from https://le.ac.uk/hate-studies/research/the-leicester-hate-crime-project/our-reports

  • Chemaly, S. (2014). There’s No Comparing Male and Female Harassment Online. There’s No Comparing Male and Female Harassment Online | Time. Retrieved August 28, 2022.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, R., Irwin, L., Newton-John, T., & Slater, A. (2019). #bodypositivity: A Content Analysis of Body Positive Accounts on Instagram. Body Image, 29, 47–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Culpepper, J. (2019). Taboo Language and Impoliteness. In K. Allan (Ed.), Oxford Handbook of Taboo Words and Language (pp. 28–40). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cwynar-Horta, J. (2016). The Commodification of the Body Positive Movement on Instagram. Stream: Culture/Politics/Technology, 8(2), 36–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahlgreen, W. (2013). Size 12 is Britain’s ‘Ideal’ Dress Size, Size 12 is Britain’s ‘Ideal’ Dress Size. YouGov. Retrieved August 29, 2022.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Health. (2011). Healthy Lives, Healthy People: A Call to Action on Obesity in England. Department of Health.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etherington, J. (2017). One Size Fits All? These Women are Different Heights and Shapes But Are Considered to Be UK’s ‘Mrs Average’… Because They’re Size 16. The Sun. Retrieved August 29, 2022.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, K. (2022). Body Positivity vs. Body Neutrality (verywellmind.com). Retrieved July 17, 2022.

  • Gao, C., & Xu, B. (2013). The Application of Semantic Field Theory to English Vocabulary Learning. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 3(11), 2030–2035.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gill, R., & Orgad, S. (2015). The Confidence Cult(ure). Australian Feminist Studies, 30(86), 324–344. https://doi.org/10.1080/08164649.2016.1148001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, S. (1998). Notes on Deconstructing ‘the Popular’. In J. Storey (Ed.), Cultural Theory and Popular Culture: A Reader (p. 442). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • KhosraviNik, M., & Esposito, E. (2018). Online Hate, Digital Discourse and Critique: Exploring Digitally-Mediated Discursive Practices of Gender-Based Hostility. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics, 14(1), 45–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KhosraviNik, M., & Unger, J. W. (2016). Critical Discourse Studies and Social Media: Power, Resistance and Critique in Changing Media Ecologies. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of Critical Discourse Studies (pp. 205–233). Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, H. M. (2020). What do Other’s Reaction to Body Posting on Instagram Tell Us? The Effects of Social Media Comments on Viewers’ Body Image Perception. New Media and Society, 23(12), 3448–3465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leaver, T., Highfield, T., & Abidin, C. (2020). Instagram: Visual Social Media Cultures. Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lupton, D. (2012). Fat. Taylor and Francis.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Megarry, J. (2017). Under the Watchful Eyes of Men: Theorising the Implications of Male Surveillance Tactics for Feminist Activism on Social Media. Feminist Media Studies, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2017.1387584

  • Plotz, B. (2020). Fat on Film. Bloomsbury.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Prendergast, M., & Quinn, F. (2020). Justice Reframed? A Comparative Critical Discourse Analysis of Twitter Campaigns and Pint Media Discourse on Two High-Profile Sexual Assault Verdicts in Ireland and Spain, Journalism Practice. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2020.1786436

  • Prohaska, A., & Gailey, J. (2009). Fat Women as “Easy Targets” Achieving Masculinity Through Hogging. In E. Rothblum & S. Soloway (Eds.), The Fat Studies Reader (pp. 158–166). New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puhl, R. M., Luedicke, J., & Grilo, C. M. (2013). Obesity Bias in Training: Attitudes, Beliefs and Observations among Advanced Trainees in Professional Health Disciplines. Obesity: A Research Journal, 22(4), 1008–1015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robyn. (2021, January 8). What Is Mid Size Fashion and How It Can Change Your Life, Midsize Millennial (midsizemillennial.co.uk). Retrieved July 17, 2022.

  • The Checkup by Single Care. (2022). Eating Disorder Statistics 2022. Retrieved July 16, 2022, from https://www.singlecare.com/blog/news/eating-disorder-statistics/#eating-disorder-prevalence

  • Tiggemann, M., Anderberg, I., & Brown, Z. (2020). #Loveyourbody: The Effect of Body Positive Instagram Captions on Women’s Body Image. Body Image, 33, 129–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Unilever. (2017). Announcing the Dove Real Beauty Pledge, Announcing the Dove Real Beauty Pledge. News | Unilever global company website. Retrieved July 17, 2022.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. (2015). Do You Know All 17 SDGs? Retrieved January 7, 2021, from https://sdgs.un.org/goals#goals

  • Vartanian, L. R. (2010). Disgust and Perceived Control in Attitudes Toward Obese People. International Journal of Obesity, 34, 1302–1307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waheed, J. (2022). The Midsize Movement Is Taking Over Fashion TikTok. Glamour. Retrieved July 17, 2022.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weingus, L. (2018). Body Neutrality Is A Body Image Movement That Doesn’t Focus On Your Appearance. HuffPost Life. Retrieved July 17, 2022.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (2016). Critical Discourse Studies: History, Agenda, Theory and Methodology. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of Critical Discourse Studies (pp. 1–22). Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, N. (1991). The Beauty Myth. Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, J., O’Flynn, G., & Macdonald, D. (2006). Being Fit and Looking Healthy: Young Women’s and Men’s Constructions of Health and Fitness. Sex Roles, 54, 707–716.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tina Kristensen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kristensen, T. (2023). Hate, Disgust, and Restrictive Eating: Abusive Comments on Body-Inclusive Posts on Instagram. In: Dalton, D., Smith, A. (eds) Gender, Sexuality and the UN's SDGs. Sustainable Development Goals Series. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-31046-1_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-31046-1_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-31045-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-31046-1

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics