Abstract
Flashing flows can be found in several energy systems, but accurate and comprehensive models for the phenomenon do not exist yet. A few models have been developed for water and CO2 flashing flows, but they are not exhaustive nor directly applicable to flashing flows of organic fluids due to the substantial differences in typical operating conditions and in thermophysical and thermodynamic properties of the fluids. These properties influence the behaviour of the two-phase flow during the flashing expansion and govern the interphase transfer phenomena. In this paper we present a comparison between results from a purposely developed 1D homogeneous equilibrium model and recent experimental data on flashing flows of R134a through a converging-diverging nozzle. The comparison between the computed mass flow rates and pressure distributions with the experimental data shows that the homogeneous equilibrium model is not able to accurately reproduce flashing flows of refrigerants and indicates a significant deviation of the system from equilibrium conditions, with underestimations of the mass flow rate up to 50% with respect to the experimental values. The difference between experimental and calculated mass flow rates is used to quantify the degree of non-equilibrium of the system and to identify the sources of non-equilibrium. The results suggest that the finite vaporization rates and the subsequent evolution of the liquid phase through metastable conditions are the primary sources of non-equilibrium in flashing flows of refrigerants and therefore, models that can relax the equilibrium assumption are needed to accurately predict the behaviour of these flows.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Abbreviations
- A:
-
Area, m2
- c:
-
Speed of sound, m/s
- C:
-
Friction factor, -
- D:
-
Diameter, m
- G:
-
Mass flux, kg/(s·m2)
- h:
-
Specific enthalpy, J/kg
- ṁ:
-
Mass flow rate, kg/s
- p:
-
Static pressure, Pa
- s:
-
Specific entropy, J/(kg·K)
- v:
-
Velocity, m/s
- x:
-
Quality, -
- z:
-
Position along nozzle axis, m
- α:
-
Void fraction, -
- β:
-
Pressure ratio, -
- Δ:
-
Difference, -
- δ:
-
Choking margin, -
- ∂:
-
Partial derivative, -
- Ф:
-
Two-phase friction multiplier, -
- μ:
-
Dynamic viscosity, Pa·s
- ρ:
-
Density, kg/m3
- ϑ:
-
Nozzle opening angle, rad
- τ:
-
Shear stress, Pa
- Ψ:
-
Thermodynamic property, J/kg, J/(kg·K) or m3/kg
- Re:
-
Reynolds number
- Ma:
-
Mach number
- w:
-
Wall
- in:
-
Inlet property
- out:
-
Outlet property
- 0:
-
Stagnation property
- min:
-
Minimum or corresponding to minimum
- L:
-
Liquid
- V:
-
Vapour
- z:
-
At position z along nozzle axis
- s:
-
At constant pressure
- LM:
-
Lockhart-Martinelli
- h:
-
Hydraulic
- f:
-
Friction
References
Angielczyk, W., Seynhaeve, J.M., Gagan, J., Bartosiewicz, Y., Butrymowicz, D.: Prediction of critical mass rate of flashing carbon dioxide flow in convergent-divergent nozzle. Chem. Eng. Process. 143, 107599 (2019)
Angielczyk, W., Bartosiewicz, Y., Butrymowicz, D.: Development of delayed equilibrium model for CO2 convergent-divergent nozzle transonic flashing flow. Int. J. Multiph. Flow 131, 103351 (2020)
Bartosiewicz, Y., Seynhaeve, J.M.: Delayed equilibrium model (DEM) of flashing choked flows relevant to LOCA. Multiph. Sci. Technol. 25(2–4), 117–131 (2013)
Bell, I.H., Wronski, J., Quoilin, S., Lemort, V.: Pure and pseudo-pure fluid thermophysical property evaluation and the open-source thermophysical property library CoolProp. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 53(6), 2498–2508 (2014)
Bouré, J.A., Fritte, A.A., Giot, M.M., Réocreux, M.L.: Highlights of two-phase critical flow: on the links between maximum flow rates, sonic velocities, propagation and transfer phenomena in single and two-phase flows. Int. J. Multiph. Flow 3(1), 1–22 (1976)
De Lorenzo, M., Lafon, P., Seynhaeve, J., Bartosiewicz, Y.: Benchmark of delayed equilibrium model (DEM) and classic two-phase critical flow models against experimental data. Int. J. Multiph. Flow 92, 112–130 (2017)
Downar-Zapolski, P., Bilicki, Z., Bolle, L., Franco, J.: The non-equilibrium relaxation model for one-dimensional flashing liquid flow. Int. J. Multiph. Flow 22(3), 473–483 (1996)
Ohta, J., Fujii, T., Akagawa, K., Takenaka, N.: Performance and flow characteristics of nozzles for initially subcooled hot water (influence of turbulence and decompression rate). Int. J. Multiph. Flow 19(1), 125–136 (1993)
Richardson, B.L.L.: Some Problems in Horizontal Two-Phase Two-Component Flow. Argonne, IL (United States) (1958)
Romei, A., Persico, G.: Computational fluid-dynamic modelling of two-phase compressible flows of carbon dioxide in supercritical conditions. Appl. Therm. Eng. 190, 116816 (2021)
Vahaji, S., Akbarzadeh, A.A., Date, A., Cheung, S.C.P., Tu, J.Y.: Efficiency of a two-phase nozzle for geothermal power generation. Appl. Therm. Eng. 73(1), 229–237 (2014)
White, M.T.: Investigating the wet-to-dry expansion of organic fluids for power generation. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 192, 122921 (2022)
Zhu, J., Elbel, S.: Measurement of static pressure profiles of vortex flashing R134a flow expanded through convergent–divergent nozzles. Int. J. Refrig 108, 258–270 (2019)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Tammone, C., Romei, A., Persico, G., Haglind, F. (2023). Non-equilibrium Phenomena in Two-Phase Flashing Flows of Organic Fluids. In: White, M., El Samad, T., Karathanassis, I., Sayma, A., Pini, M., Guardone, A. (eds) Proceedings of the 4th International Seminar on Non-Ideal Compressible Fluid Dynamics for Propulsion and Power. NICFD 2022. ERCOFTAC Series, vol 29. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-30936-6_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-30936-6_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-30935-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-30936-6
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)