Skip to main content

Weakly-Supervised Multi-action Offline Reinforcement Learning for Intelligent Dosing of Epilepsy in Children

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Database Systems for Advanced Applications (DASFAA 2023)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 13946))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1642 Accesses

Abstract

Epilepsy in childhood is a common neurological disorder in children. Most cases are benign childhood epilepsy, which can be controlled with medication by adaptive adjustment of the dosage of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). Recently, reinforcement learning-based intelligent dosing has attracted increasing attention. In clinical practice, patients usually take more than one drug at a time, however, conventional reinforcement learning algorithms do not sufficiently address the combination of two or more active drugs. In this paper, we propose the multi-action offline reinforcement learning (MA-ORL) model to solve this problem. Concretely, MA-ORL inherits the basic framework of the actor-critic network. For the patient’s health and safety concerns, MA-ORL abandons the intrusive and high-risk “trial-and-error” interactions with the environment but directly learns from the offline clinical dataset in the initial phase until the model is sufficiently trained and ready to use. Besides, to choose multiple actions simultaneously, we replace the actor’s output in standard reinforcement learning with a 2D matrix indicating the mixed feature representation of all different actions, then multiply it with separate masks to obtain separated actions. In addition to reaching an optimal return (i.e., the reduction of seizure frequency), MA-ORL also emphasizes the accuracy of the recommended dosage. Therefore, we introduce weak supervision to the learning objective to restrict the range of the learning outcome. It guarantees the recommended dosage by MA-ORL is as close as the one prescribed by experienced physicians. We conduct extensive experiments on clinical medical records containing 245 cases of epilepsy in childhood. Experimental results show MA-ORL reaches the highest cumulative return among all baseline models. Moreover, the suggested amount of medication taken a day by MA-ORL is more accurate than any other benchmark.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Chang, B.S., Lowenstein, D.H.: Epilepsy. N. Engl. J. Med. 349(13), 1257–1266 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Fisher, R., et al.: ILAE official report: a practical clinical definition of epilepsy. Epilepsia 55(4), 475–482 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Epilepsy. World Health Organization (WHO) (2022). https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/epilepsy

  4. Camfield, P., Camfield, C.: Incidence, prevalence and Aetiology of seizures and epilepsy in children. Epileptic Disord. 17(2), 117–123 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Stafstrom, C.E., Carmant, L.: Seizures and epilepsy: an overview for neuroscientists. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 7(5), 1–19 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Minardi, C., et al.: Epilepsy in children: from diagnosis to treatment with focus on emergency. J. Clin. Med. 8(1), 39 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. George, J., Kulkarni, C., Sarma, G.: Antiepileptic drugs and quality of life in patients with epilepsy: a tertiary care hospital-based study. Value Health Reg. Issues 6, 1–6 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bittigau, P., et al.: Antiepileptic drugs and apoptotic neurodegeneration in the developing brain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 99(23), 15089–15094 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Liu, G., Nicole, S., Perkins, A.: Epilepsy: treatment options. Am. Fam. Physician 96(2), 87–96 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Topol, E.J.: High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence. Nat. Med. 25(1), 44–56 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. He, J., Baxter, S.L., Xu, J., Xu, J., Zhou, X., Zhang, K.: The practical implementation of artificial intelligence technologies in medicine. Nat. Med. 25(1), 30–36 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Esteva, A., et al.: A guide to deep learning in healthcare. Nat. Med. 25(1), 24–29 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Taghanaki, S.A., Abhishek, K., Cohen, J.P., Cohen-Adad, J., Hamarneh, G.: Deep semantic segmentation of natural and medical images: a review. Artif. Intell. Rev. 54(1), 137–178 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wang, L., Zhang, W., He, X., Zha, H.: Supervised reinforcement learning with recurrent neural network for dynamic treatment recommendation. In: Proceedings of the 24th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining, pp. 2447–2456 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Zhao, Y., Kosorok, M.R., Zeng, D.: Reinforcement learning design for cancer clinical trials. Stat. Med. 28(26), 3294–3315 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Yu, C., Liu, J., Nemati, S., Yin, G.: Reinforcement learning in healthcare: a survey. ACM Comput. Surv. 55(1), 1–36 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Komorowski, M., Celi, L.A., Badawi, O., Gordon, A.C., Faisal, A.A.: The artificial intelligence clinician learns optimal treatment strategies for sepsis in intensive care. Nat. Med. 24(11), 1716–1720 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Levine, S., Kumar, A., Tucker, G., Fu, J.: Offline reinforcement learning: tutorial, review, and perspectives on open problems. CoRR abs/2005.01643 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Fujimoto, S., Meger, D., Precup, D.: Off-policy deep reinforcement learning without exploration. In: Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML2019), pp. 2052–2062 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Busoniu, L., Babuska, R., De Schutter, B.: A comprehensive survey of multiagent reinforcement learning. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man, Cybern. Part C (Appl. Rev.) 38(2), 156–172 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Foerster, N.J., et al.: Stabilising experience replay for deep multi-agent reinforcement learning. In: Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML2017), pp. 1146–1155 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Sunehag, P., et al.: Value-decomposition networks for cooperative multi-agent learning. In: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS2018), pp. 2085–2087 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Rashid, T., Samvelyan, M., Witt, D.S.C., Farquhar, G., Foerster, N.J., Whiteson, S.: QMIX: monotonic value function Factorisation for deep multi-agent reinforcement learning. In: Proceedings of the 35th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML2018), pp. 4292–4301 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ryan, L., Yi, W., Aviv, T., Jean, H., Pieter, A., Igor, M.: Multi-agent actor-critic for mixed cooperative-competitive environments. In: Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS2017), pp. 6382–6393 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Vinyals, O., et al.: StarCraft II: a new challenge for reinforcement learning. CoRR abs/1708.04782 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Baker, B., Kanitscheider, I., Markov, M.T., Wu, Y., Powel, G.: Emergent tool use from multi-agent Autocurricula. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR2020) (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Zhang, Y., Yang, Q.: A survey on multi-task learning. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 34(12), 5586–5609 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Sebastian R.: An overview of multi-task learning in deep neural networks. CoRR abs/1706.05098 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Yang, Y., Hospedales, T.M.: Trace norm Regularised deep multi-task learning. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR2017), Workshop Track Proceedings (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Sutton, R.S., Barto, A.G.: Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction, 2nd edn. MIT Press, Cambridge (2018)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. François-Lavet, V., Henderson, P., Islam, R., Bellemare, M.G., Pineau, J.: An introduction to deep reinforcement learning. Found. Trends Mach. Learn. 11(3–4), 219–354 (2018)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Kingma, D.P., Welling, M.: Auto-encoding Variational Bayes. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR2014) (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Sohn, K., Lee, H., Yan, X.: Learning structured output representation using deep conditional generative models. In: Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS2015), pp. 3483–3491 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Hussein, A., Gaber, M.M., Elyan, E., Jayne, C.: Imitation learning: a survey of learning methods. ACM Comput. Surv. 50(2), 1–35 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Yue Y., Le, H.M.: Imitation learning tutorial. ICML Tutorial (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Mnih, V., et al.: Playing Atari with deep reinforcement learning. CoRR abs/1312.5602 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Lillicrap, P.T., et al.: Continuous control with deep reinforcement learning. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR2016) (2016)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by the Ph.D., Scientific Research Foundation, The Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications (No. E012A2022026), National Key Research and Development Program of China (No. 2019YFE0110800), National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 61972060 and 62027827), Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing (No. cstc2020jcyj-zdxmX0025), Research Institute for Artificial Intelligence of Things (Project No. CD5H) and Research and Innovation Office (Project No. BD4A), The Hong Kong Polytechnic University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhuo Li .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Li, Z. et al. (2023). Weakly-Supervised Multi-action Offline Reinforcement Learning for Intelligent Dosing of Epilepsy in Children. In: Wang, X., et al. Database Systems for Advanced Applications. DASFAA 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13946. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-30678-5_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-30678-5_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-30677-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-30678-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics