Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Design Elements and Design Spaces for Attainable Game Experiences

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Universal Design in Video Games

Part of the book series: Human–Computer Interaction Series ((HCIS))

  • 89 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter focuses on the design directives and design constraints within the four heuristics of AGE and the critical need to balance them for accomplishing the development of universally accessible and inclusive video games. It argues that AGE heuristics serve not merely as guidelines but as a dynamic scaffold that provides foundational insights for informed design decisions. This chapter explores how such a balanced approach transcends conventional accessibility, leading to the creation of games that are deeply responsive to the diverse needs of a wide player base. Through this balance, the chapter underscores the industry's ongoing commitment to Universal Design principles, advocating for a gaming landscape where players of all abilities can engage and participate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    However, these communities have been noted for fostering toxic behavior against accessibility and inclusion, so exercise caution when deciding whom you and your game are courting. For a deeper understanding, see the comprehensive discussions by Fahey [8] and Parlock [27]. Further research on this topic is available in studies by Kowert [15] and Frommel et al. [23].

References

  1. Barone, E. (2016). Stardew Valley, Chuckelfish

    Google Scholar 

  2. Björk, S., & Holopainen, J. (2005). Patterns in game design (1st ed.). Charles River Media.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chekhov, A. (2008) [1887–1904]. Five plays. Ivanov, The Seagull, Uncle Vanya, Three Sisters, and The Cherry Orchard. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cliffe, J. (2012), Counter-strike—Global offensive. Valve Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Costikyan, G. (1994). “I Have No Words and I Must Design.” Interactive fantasy 2. Hogshead Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dix, A. (2003). Human-computer interaction. Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Elias, G. S., Garfield, R., & Gutschera, K. R. (2012). Characteristics of games. MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fahey, R. (2019). “Accessibility” and “difficulty” aren't the same thing. Opinion Gamesindustry.biz Published on April 12, 2019. Reviewed 15, September, 2023

    Google Scholar 

  9. Frommel, J., Johnson, D., & Mandryk, R. L. (2023). How perceived toxicity of gaming communities is associated with social capital, satisfaction of relatedness, and loneliness. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 10, 100302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fujibayashi, H. (2017). The Legend of Zelda. Breath of the Wild, Nintendo

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fullerton, T. (2019). Game design workshop: a play centric approach to creating innovative games. 4th edition CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Howard. T (2011) Skyrim, Bethesda Game Studios

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hunicke, R., LeBlanc, M., & Zubek, R. (2004, July). MDA: A formal approach to game design and game research. In Proceedings of the AAAI Workshop on Challenges in Game AI (Vol. 4, No. 1, p. 1722).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kihlstrom, J. F. (2021). Ecological validity and “Ecological Validity.” Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(2), 466–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kowert, R. (2020). Dark participation in games. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 2969.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lazy Bear Games. (2018) Graveyard keeper. tinyBuild.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Leite, P.d.S., & Almeida, L.D.A. (2021). Extended analysis procedure for inclusive game elements: Accessibility features in the last of us Part 2. In: M. Antona & C. Stephanidis (Eds.), Universal access in human-computer interaction. design methods and user experience. HCII 2021. Lecture notes in computer science (Vol. 12768). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78092-0_11

  18. LightSpeed & Quantum Studio. (2018). PUBG mobile. Krafton, Tencent and VNG Games.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Miyamoto, S., Yamauchi, H., & Tezuka, T. (1985). Super Mario Bros. Nintendo Entertainment System. Nintendo.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Miyazaki, H., Zin, N., Ishizaki, J., Kimijima, Y., Hirai, S., & Yoshida, H. (2011). Dark Soul I. From Software.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Miyazaki, H., Zin, N., Ishizaki, J., Kimijima, Y., Hirai, S., & Yoshida, H. (2014). Dark Soul II. From Software.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Miyazaki, H., Zin, N., Ishizaki, J., Kimijima, Y., Hirai, S., & Yoshida, H. (2016). Dark Soul III. From Software.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Moreau, C. P., & Dahl, D. W. (2005). Designing the solution: The impact of constraints on consumers’ creativity. Journal of Consumer Research, 32(1), 13–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Nielsen, J. (2005). Ten usability heuristics.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Pan, J. Y. (2021). Chekhov’s guns: Technology, design, and intention in narrative fiction.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Palmquist, A. (2023). Plug & Play? Stakeholders’ co-meaning making of gamification implementations in workplace learning environments (Dissertation University of Gothenburg Department of Applied Information Technology)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Parlock, J. (2019). The biggest hurdle of accessible games may be the community, not developers. Opinion Polygon Published on Dec 23, 2019. Reviewed 15, September, 2023

    Google Scholar 

  28. Pathea Games (2019), My Time in Portia, Team 17.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Persson, M., & Bergensten, J. (2009). Minecraft. Mojang.

    Google Scholar 

  30. PlayStation. (2020). Accessibility options for The Last of Us Part II. https://www.playstation.com/en-us/games/the-last-of-us-part-ii/accessibility/. Reviewed 28, September, 2023

  31. Preece, J., Sharp, H., & Rogers, Y. (2015). Interaction design: Beyond human-computer interaction. Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Salkind, N. J. (Ed.). (2010). Encyclopedia of research design (Vol. 1). SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Salen, K. & Zimmerman, E. (2003). Rules of play: Game design fundamentals. MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Schatz, E., Cambier, R., & Cambier, R. (2020), The last of us Part II. Naughty Dog.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Schell, J. (2019). The art of game design. CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Super Evil Megacorp. (2014). Vainglory. Super Evil Megacorp & Rogue Games Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Tabata, H. (2016). Final fantasy XV. Square Enix.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Thorson, M. & Berry, N. (2018). Celeste. Maddy Makes Games.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Tobii Gaming. (2017) 7 eye tracking features in Assassin’s Creed ® origins. Tobii https://www.tobii.com/blog/revealed-7-eye-tracking-features-in-assassin-s-creed-origins. Reviewed September 28, 2023.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Social Sciences, Nord University, Levanger, Norway

    Adam Palmquist & Ole Goethe

  2. Faculty of Applied IT, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden

    Adam Palmquist

  3. Faculty of Education and Arts, Nord University, Levanger, Norway

    Izabella Jedel

Authors
  1. Adam Palmquist
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Izabella Jedel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ole Goethe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adam Palmquist .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Palmquist, A., Jedel, I., Goethe, O. (2024). Design Elements and Design Spaces for Attainable Game Experiences. In: Universal Design in Video Games. Human–Computer Interaction Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-30595-5_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-30595-5_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-30594-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-30595-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation