Abstract
From a naturalistic approach, several attempts have been made to justify teleological explanations by appealing to the action of selective mechanisms. In philosophy of biology, natural selection has often been assumed to be the paradigmatic case of selective mechanism, and, on this basis, different generalized biological selective explanations have been proposed in an attempt to substantiate natural teleology. In this paper we use a different strategy. Starting from a general definition of selection as differential reinforcement, we interpret the different types of teleological explanation, both biological and non-biological, as specific cases of selective explanations, of which evolutionary explanations would be only a specific subset (rather than the only ones). We illustrate this by analyzing teleological explanations that make reference to biological regulatory processes.
The authors are listed alphabetically. Both of them have contributed equally to this work. We are especially grateful for the feedback from the editors of this volume, as well as from the PBCX attendees. We also thank audiences at the University of Bielefeld, Complutense University (Madrid), the University of Helsinki, the National University of Colombia (Bogotá), Nova University of Lisbon, the University of Oslo, the University of Prague, UAM (Madrid), the University of the West of England Bristol, and UNED (Madrid). Special thanks to Leonardo Bich, Matteo Mossio and several anonymous reviewers. Thanks as well to Megan J. Watkins for the linguistic revision of the article. This work has been supported by the Spanish Government research projects APID2021-128835NB-I00 and PID2021-123938NB-I00.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
An account of selection in terms of retention can also be found in Campbell (1960).
- 2.
Note that this type of selected-effects theory posits sufficient, but not necessary, conditions of teleology. We leave open the possibility of teleology without selection.
- 3.
This formulation of teleological intentionalism has clear precedents in Broad’s classic proposal (Broad 1925: 82).
- 4.
For a detailed analysis of the “design argument,” see Sober (2018). Put forward by Hume in his Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion, and famously expounded in the the early nineteenth century by William Paley, this argument has been pervasive in the history of biology up to the present day.
- 5.
A classic discussion of the distinction between finalistic “what for?” questions, as opposed to historical “how come?” ones, can be found in Mayr (e.g., 1961).
- 6.
Again, this is only a sufficient but not a necessary condition. A trait can be explained teleologically in relation to its selective history, but not only so, as shown, for example, by teleological explanations based on biological regulation.
- 7.
In this paper we focus mainly on the characterization of regulation developed by Bich and collaborators and presented in Bich et al. (2016), Bich et al. (2020), and Bechtel and Bich (2021), because it is a particularly well-developed analysis of biological regulation, particularly well suited for conceptual and philosophical analysis (see also Winning and Bechtel 2018).
References
Adams FR (1979) A goal–state theory of function attributions. Can J Philos 9(3):493–518
Artiga M (2021) Biological functions and natural selection: a reappraisal. Eur J Philos Sci 11(2):1–22
Ashby WR (1956) An introduction to cybernetics. Chapman and Hall, London
Barros DB (2008) Natural selection as a mechanism. Philos Sci 75(3):306–322
Bechtel W (2007) Biological mechanisms: organized to maintain autonomy. In: Boogerd F, Bruggerman F, Hofmeyr JH, Westerhoff HV (eds) Systems biology. Philosophical Foundations, Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 269–302
Bechtel W, Bich L (2021) Grounding cognition: heterarchical control mechanisms in biology. Philos Trans R Soc B: Biol Sci 376(1820):20190751
Bedau M (1991) Can biological teleology be naturalized? J Philos 88(11):647–655
Bich L, Mossio M, Ruiz-Mirazo K, Moreno A (2016) Biological regulation: controlling the system from within. Biol Philos 31(2):237–265
Bich L, Mossio M, Soto AM (2020) Glycemia regulation: from feedback loops to organizational closure. Front Physiol 11
Boorse C (1976) Wright on functions. Philos Rev 85(1):70–86
Broad CS (1925) The mind and its place in nature. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London
Buller DJ (1998) Etiological theories of function: a geographical survey. Biol Philos 13(4):505–527
Buller DJ (ed) (1999) Function, selection, and design. SUNY Press, Albany NY
Burnet FM (1957) A modification of Jerne’s theory of antibody production using the concept of clonal selection. Aust J Sci 20:67–69
Campbell DT (1960) Blind variation and selective retentions in creative thought as in other knowledge processes. Psychol Rev 67(6):380
Christensen WD, Bickhard MH (2002) The process dynamics of normative function. Monist 85(1):3–28
Darden L, Cain JA (1989) Selection type theories. Philos Sci 56:106–129
Darwin C (1868) The variation of animals and plants under domestication, vol 1 and 2. John Murray, London
Edin B (2008) Assigning biological functions: making sense of causal chains. Synthese 161:203–218
Garson J (2017) A generalized selected effects theory of function. Philos Sci 84(3):523–543
Glennan S (2017) The new mechanical philosophy. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Godfrey-Smith P (1993) Functions: consensus without unity. Pac Philos Q 74:196–208
Griffiths PE (1993) Functional analysis and proper functions. Br J Philos Sci 44(3):409–422
Illari PM, Williamson J (2012) What is a mechanism? Thinking about mechanisms across the sciences. Eur J Philos Sci 2:119–135
Keller EF (2008) Organisms, machines, and thunderstorms: a history of self-organization, part one. Hist Stud Nat Sci 38(1):45–75
Kitano H (2007) Towards a theory of biological robustness. Mol Syst Biol 3(137):1–7
Kitcher P (1993) Function and design. Midwest Stud Philos 18(1):379–397
Mayr E (1961) Cause and effect in biology. Science 134:1501–1506
McLaughlin P (2009) Functions and norms. In: Krohs U, Kroes P (eds) Functions in biological and artificial worlds. Comparative philosophical perspectives. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 93–102
Millikan RG (1984) Language, thought, and other biological categories: new foundations for realism. MIT Press
Millikan RG (1989) In defense of proper functions. Philos Sci 56(2):288–302
Mossio M, Saborido C, Moreno A (2009) An organizational account for biological functions. Br J Philos Sci 60(4):813–841
Neander K (1991) Functions as selected effects: the conceptual analyst's defense. Philos Sci 58(2):168–184
Rosenblueth A, Wiener N, Bigelow J (1943) Behavior, purpose and teleology. Philos Sci 10:18–24
Saborido C, Moreno A (2015) Biological pathology from an organizational perspective. Theor Med Bioeth 36(1):83–95
Saborido C, Mossio M, Moreno A (2011) Biological organization and cross-generation functions. Br J Philos Sci 62(3):583–606
Schlosser G (1998) Self-re-production and functionality: a systems-theoretical approach to teleological explanation. Synthese 116:303–354
Sober E (2018) The design argument. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Sommerhoff G (1950) Analytical biology. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Sommerhoff G (1959) The abstract characteristics of living organisms. In: Emery FE (ed) Systems thinking. Harmondsworth, London, pp 147–202
Walsh DM (2008) Teleology. In: Ruse M (ed) The Oxford handbook of philosophy of biology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 113–137
Winning J, Bechtel W (2018) Rethinking causality in biological and neural mechanisms: constraints and control. Mind Mach 28(2):287–310
Wright L (1976) Teleological explanations: an etiological analysis of goals and functions. University of California Press, Berkeley
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
González de Prado, J., Saborido, C. (2023). Teleological Explanations and Selective Mechanisms: Biological Teleology Beyond Natural Selection. In: Viejo, J.M., Sanjuán, M. (eds) Life and Mind. Interdisciplinary Evolution Research, vol 8. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-30304-3_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-30304-3_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-30303-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-30304-3
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)