Skip to main content

Teleological Explanations and Selective Mechanisms: Biological Teleology Beyond Natural Selection

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Life and Mind

Part of the book series: Interdisciplinary Evolution Research ((IDER,volume 8))

  • 295 Accesses

Abstract

From a naturalistic approach, several attempts have been made to justify teleological explanations by appealing to the action of selective mechanisms. In philosophy of biology, natural selection has often been assumed to be the paradigmatic case of selective mechanism, and, on this basis, different generalized biological selective explanations have been proposed in an attempt to substantiate natural teleology. In this paper we use a different strategy. Starting from a general definition of selection as differential reinforcement, we interpret the different types of teleological explanation, both biological and non-biological, as specific cases of selective explanations, of which evolutionary explanations would be only a specific subset (rather than the only ones). We illustrate this by analyzing teleological explanations that make reference to biological regulatory processes.

The authors are listed alphabetically. Both of them have contributed equally to this work. We are especially grateful for the feedback from the editors of this volume, as well as from the PBCX attendees. We also thank audiences at the University of Bielefeld, Complutense University (Madrid), the University of Helsinki, the National University of Colombia (Bogotá), Nova University of Lisbon, the University of Oslo, the University of Prague, UAM (Madrid), the University of the West of England Bristol, and UNED (Madrid). Special thanks to Leonardo Bich, Matteo Mossio and several anonymous reviewers. Thanks as well to Megan J. Watkins for the linguistic revision of the article. This work has been supported by the Spanish Government research projects APID2021-128835NB-I00 and PID2021-123938NB-I00.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    An account of selection in terms of retention can also be found in Campbell (1960).

  2. 2.

    Note that this type of selected-effects theory posits sufficient, but not necessary, conditions of teleology. We leave open the possibility of teleology without selection.

  3. 3.

    This formulation of teleological intentionalism has clear precedents in Broad’s classic proposal (Broad 1925: 82).

  4. 4.

    For a detailed analysis of the “design argument,” see Sober (2018). Put forward by Hume in his Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion, and famously expounded in the the early nineteenth century by William Paley, this argument has been pervasive in the history of biology up to the present day.

  5. 5.

    A classic discussion of the distinction between finalistic “what for?” questions, as opposed to historical “how come?” ones, can be found in Mayr (e.g., 1961).

  6. 6.

    Again, this is only a sufficient but not a necessary condition. A trait can be explained teleologically in relation to its selective history, but not only so, as shown, for example, by teleological explanations based on biological regulation.

  7. 7.

    In this paper we focus mainly on the characterization of regulation developed by Bich and collaborators and presented in Bich et al. (2016), Bich et al. (2020), and Bechtel and Bich (2021), because it is a particularly well-developed analysis of biological regulation, particularly well suited for conceptual and philosophical analysis (see also Winning and Bechtel 2018).

References

  • Adams FR (1979) A goal–state theory of function attributions. Can J Philos 9(3):493–518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Artiga M (2021) Biological functions and natural selection: a reappraisal. Eur J Philos Sci 11(2):1–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashby WR (1956) An introduction to cybernetics. Chapman and Hall, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Barros DB (2008) Natural selection as a mechanism. Philos Sci 75(3):306–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bechtel W (2007) Biological mechanisms: organized to maintain autonomy. In: Boogerd F, Bruggerman F, Hofmeyr JH, Westerhoff HV (eds) Systems biology. Philosophical Foundations, Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 269–302

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bechtel W, Bich L (2021) Grounding cognition: heterarchical control mechanisms in biology. Philos Trans R Soc B: Biol Sci 376(1820):20190751

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bedau M (1991) Can biological teleology be naturalized? J Philos 88(11):647–655

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bich L, Mossio M, Ruiz-Mirazo K, Moreno A (2016) Biological regulation: controlling the system from within. Biol Philos 31(2):237–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bich L, Mossio M, Soto AM (2020) Glycemia regulation: from feedback loops to organizational closure. Front Physiol 11

    Google Scholar 

  • Boorse C (1976) Wright on functions. Philos Rev 85(1):70–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broad CS (1925) The mind and its place in nature. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Buller DJ (1998) Etiological theories of function: a geographical survey. Biol Philos 13(4):505–527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buller DJ (ed) (1999) Function, selection, and design. SUNY Press, Albany NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnet FM (1957) A modification of Jerne’s theory of antibody production using the concept of clonal selection. Aust J Sci 20:67–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell DT (1960) Blind variation and selective retentions in creative thought as in other knowledge processes. Psychol Rev 67(6):380

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen WD, Bickhard MH (2002) The process dynamics of normative function. Monist 85(1):3–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darden L, Cain JA (1989) Selection type theories. Philos Sci 56:106–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darwin C (1868) The variation of animals and plants under domestication, vol 1 and 2. John Murray, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Edin B (2008) Assigning biological functions: making sense of causal chains. Synthese 161:203–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garson J (2017) A generalized selected effects theory of function. Philos Sci 84(3):523–543

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glennan S (2017) The new mechanical philosophy. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Godfrey-Smith P (1993) Functions: consensus without unity. Pac Philos Q 74:196–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths PE (1993) Functional analysis and proper functions. Br J Philos Sci 44(3):409–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Illari PM, Williamson J (2012) What is a mechanism? Thinking about mechanisms across the sciences. Eur J Philos Sci 2:119–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller EF (2008) Organisms, machines, and thunderstorms: a history of self-organization, part one. Hist Stud Nat Sci 38(1):45–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitano H (2007) Towards a theory of biological robustness. Mol Syst Biol 3(137):1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitcher P (1993) Function and design. Midwest Stud Philos 18(1):379–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayr E (1961) Cause and effect in biology. Science 134:1501–1506

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin P (2009) Functions and norms. In: Krohs U, Kroes P (eds) Functions in biological and artificial worlds. Comparative philosophical perspectives. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 93–102

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Millikan RG (1984) Language, thought, and other biological categories: new foundations for realism. MIT Press

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Millikan RG (1989) In defense of proper functions. Philos Sci 56(2):288–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mossio M, Saborido C, Moreno A (2009) An organizational account for biological functions. Br J Philos Sci 60(4):813–841

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neander K (1991) Functions as selected effects: the conceptual analyst's defense. Philos Sci 58(2):168–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenblueth A, Wiener N, Bigelow J (1943) Behavior, purpose and teleology. Philos Sci 10:18–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saborido C, Moreno A (2015) Biological pathology from an organizational perspective. Theor Med Bioeth 36(1):83–95

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Saborido C, Mossio M, Moreno A (2011) Biological organization and cross-generation functions. Br J Philos Sci 62(3):583–606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlosser G (1998) Self-re-production and functionality: a systems-theoretical approach to teleological explanation. Synthese 116:303–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sober E (2018) The design argument. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sommerhoff G (1950) Analytical biology. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Sommerhoff G (1959) The abstract characteristics of living organisms. In: Emery FE (ed) Systems thinking. Harmondsworth, London, pp 147–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh DM (2008) Teleology. In: Ruse M (ed) The Oxford handbook of philosophy of biology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 113–137

    Google Scholar 

  • Winning J, Bechtel W (2018) Rethinking causality in biological and neural mechanisms: constraints and control. Mind Mach 28(2):287–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright L (1976) Teleological explanations: an etiological analysis of goals and functions. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Javier González de Prado .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

González de Prado, J., Saborido, C. (2023). Teleological Explanations and Selective Mechanisms: Biological Teleology Beyond Natural Selection. In: Viejo, J.M., Sanjuán, M. (eds) Life and Mind. Interdisciplinary Evolution Research, vol 8. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-30304-3_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics