Skip to main content

Prediction, Butterfly Effect, and Decision-Making

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Managing Complexity in Social Systems

Part of the book series: Management for Professionals ((MANAGPROF))

  • 243 Accesses

Abstract

Prediction has become an integral part of management. Managerial decisions cannot be done without them. Any investment decision of relevance requires forecasting of crucial parameters, like interest rates and demand. Any spending on research and development requires an estimate of future needs. Or so it is believed. Yet all scientific evidence points in the same direction: long-term, science-based predictions are impossible in both, natural science and social science. Of course, “long-term” means different time spans for different systems depending on the speed of change. The speed of deviation from a perfect cycle of the orbits of sun, Earth, and moon together is so slow that long-term means thousands of years. Climate change and its impact on weather and on sea level are much faster and long-term means a couple of decades at most. Weather and an epidemic like COVID-19 change so rapidly that long-term means just a couple of days. Thus, forecasting cannot be a prerequisite of good decisions anymore. Rather it is the other way round. Understanding a decision’s impact on a system’s future behavior enables good decisions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Arthur WB (1989) Competing technologies, increasing returns and lock-in by historical events. Econ J 99:106–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dizikes P (2011) When the butterfly effect took flight. MIT Technol Rev

    Google Scholar 

  • Fontenrose J (1981) Delphic oracle: its responses and operations. University of California Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Forrester J (1971) Counterintuitive behavior of social systems. Technol Rev 73(3):52–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeth T et al (2006) Decoding the ancient Greek astronomical calculator known as the Antikythera mechanism. Nature 444(7119):587–591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gabor D (1963) Inventing the future. Secker & Warburg, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardin G (1961) Three classes of truth: their implications for the behavioral sciences. ETC Rev Gen Semant 18:5–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapmeier F, Greenspan A, Jones A, Sterman J (2021) Science-based analysis for climate action: how HSBC bank uses the En-ROADS climate policy simulation. Syst Dyn Rev 37(4):333–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kermack W, McKendrick A (1927) A contribution to the mathematical theory of epidemics. Proc R Soc Lond Ser A 115(772):700–721

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn T (1962) The structure of scientific revolutions. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Laplace P-S (1814) Essai philosophique sur les probabilités. Courcier, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz E (1963) Deterministic nonperiodic flow. J Atmos Sci 20(2):130–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marx K (1859) A contribution to the critique of political economy. Progress Publishers, Moscow

    Google Scholar 

  • Meadows D (1999) Chicken little, Cassandra, and the real wolf. Whole Earth, Spring

    Google Scholar 

  • Meadows D, Meadows DL, Randers J, Behrens W (1972) The limits to growth. Potomac Associates, Falls Church

    Google Scholar 

  • Our World in Data (2023a) Share of people who received at least one dose of COVID-19 vaccine. https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/share-people-vaccinated-covid

  • Our World in Data (2023b) Weekly new hospital admissions for COVID-19 per million. https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/weekly-hospital-admissions-covid-per-million

  • Poincaré H (1890) Sur le problème des trois corps et les équations de la dynamique. Acta Math 13:1–270

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper K (1944–1945) The poverty of historicism. Economia 11:86–103, 11:119–137, 12:69–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper K (1959) The logic of scientific discovery. Routledge, Abingdon-on-Thames

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenblueth A, Wiener N, Bigelow J (1943) Behavior, purpose and teleology. Philos Sci 10:18–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumacher E (1973) A machine to foretell the future? In: Small is beautiful: a study of economics as if people mattered. Blond & Briggs, London (Chapter 15)

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor F (1911) The principles of scientific management. Harper & Brothers, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christoph E. Mandl .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Mandl, C.E. (2023). Prediction, Butterfly Effect, and Decision-Making. In: Managing Complexity in Social Systems. Management for Professionals. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-30222-0_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics