Abstract
Soil-structure interaction (SSI) may condition the seismic performance of buildings in different ways. Previous studies show that SSI effects on structural response parameters may be either beneficial or detrimental, depending on specific characteristics of the structure, the soil, and the demand. Despite the great efforts put over the last decades into developing performance-based seismic design (PBSD) practices, engineers still rely on prescriptive code requirements for design purposes. Considering SSI effects, ASCE-7, for example, allows determining a reduced design-shear demand (\(\tilde{V }\)) that obeys the interacting soil-structure system behavior. It is calculated by reducing the conventional shear demand, \(V\), by a variation \(\Delta V\), according to \(\tilde{V }=V-\Delta V\ge \alpha V\); where \(\alpha \) controls the magnitude of the reduced demand. \(\alpha \) depends on the response modification factor (\(R\)), resulting in a more significant reduction for structures presenting limited inelastic responses than for more ductile ones. This study investigates the behavior of \(\alpha \) in ductile RC buildings while exposing the need to reflect not only the beneficial effects of SSI but the detrimental ones in determining the design-shear demand. To this end, 729 3D soil-structure systems (SSS) with different plan aspect ratios, slenderness ratios, and soil shear wave velocities were designed and analyzed using OpenSeesPy. Linear and nonlinear analysis procedures (APs) recommended at ASCE-41 are used to evaluate the response of the designed buildings. Based on these responses, a machine-learning (ML) technique is used to generate an estimation model for \(\alpha \), showing that the slenderness ratio, \({\lambda }_{str}\), the fixed-base period, \(T\), and the wave parameter, \({\sigma }_{SSI}\) are key parameters to explain up to 90% of its variation.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
American Society of Civil Engineers: Minimum Design Loads and Associated Criteria for Buildings and Other Structures. ASCE/SEI, Reston, Virginia (2017)
Torabi, H., Rayhani, M.T.: Three dimensional finite element modeling of seismic soil-structure interaction in soft soil. Comput. Geotech. 60, 9–19 (2014)
Fu, J., Todorovska, M.I., Liang, J.: Correction factors for SSI effects predicted by simplified models: 2D versus 3D rectangular embedded foundations. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 47(9), 1963–1983 (2018)
Lu, Y., Hajirasouliha, I., Marshall, A.M.: Performance-based seismic design of flexible-base multi-storey buildings considering soil-structure interaction. Eng. Struct. 108, 90–103 (2016)
Emami, A., Halabian, A.M.: Seismic response assessment of reinforced concrete structures based on displacement, force and energy criteria, considering soil-structure interaction. Aust. J. Struct. Eng. 21(1), 64–93 (2020)
Khosravikia, F., Mahsuli, M., Ghannad, M.A.: Probabilistic evaluation of 2015 NEHRP soil-structure interaction provisions. J. Eng. Mech. 143(9), 1–11 (2017)
Mirzaie, F., Mahsuli, M., Ghannad, M.A.: Probabilistic analysis of soil-structure interaction effects on the seismic performance of structures. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 46(4), 641–660 (2017)
Abtahi, S., Mahsuli, M., Ghannad, M.A.: Probabilistic evaluation of soil – structure interaction effects on strength demands of shear buildings. J. Struct. Eng. 146(1), 1–12 (2020)
Trombetta, N.W., Mason, H.B., Hutchinson, T.C., Zupan, J.D., Bray, J.D., Kutter, B.L.: Nonlinear soil–foundation–structure and structure–soil–structure interaction: engineering demands. J. Struct. Eng. 141(7), 1–12 (2015)
McKenna, F., Scott, M.H., Fenves, G.L.: Nonlinear finite-element analysis software architecture using object composition. J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 24(1), 95–107 (2010)
Zhu, M., McKenna, F., Scott, M.H.: OpenSeesPy: Python library for the OpenSees finite element framework. SoftwareX 7, 6–11 (2018)
American Society of Civil Engineers: Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Existing Buildings, ASCE/SEI 41. ASCE/SEI, Reston, Virginia (2017)
Mylonakis, G., Gazetas, G.: Seismic soil-structure interaction: beneficial or detrimental? J. Earthq. Eng. 4(3), 277–301 (2000)
American Concrete Institute: Requisitos de Reglamento para Concreto Estructural (ACI 318S-14) y Comentarios (ACI 318SR-14). ACI, Farmington Hills, MI (2015)
Pais, A., Kausel, E.: Approximate formulas for dynamic stiffnesses of rigid foundations. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 7(4), 213–227 (1988)
Applied Technology Council: Seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete buildings (Volume 1). Seismic Safety Commission, Redwood City, California (1996)
Harden, C., Hutchinson, T., Martin, G. R., Kutter, B. L.: Numerical modeling of the nonlinear cyclic response of shallow foundations. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley (2005)
Scott, M.H., Fenves, G.L.: Plastic hinge integration methods for force-based beam-column elements. J. Struct. Eng. 132(2), 244–252 (2006)
Park, R., Paulay, T.: Estructuras de Concreto Reforzado. Primera Edición. Wiley, Mexico (1983)
Haselton, C. B., Liel, A.B., Taylor, S., Deierlein, G. G.: Beam-column element model calibrated for predicting flexural response leading to global collapse of RC frame buildings. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley (2008).
Boulanger, R.W., Curras, C.J., Kutter, B.L., Wilson, D.W., Abghari, A.: Seismic soil-pile-structure interaction experiments and analyses. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 125(9), 750–759 (1999)
Harden, C., Hutchinson, T.C., Moore, M.: Investigation into the effects of foundation uplift on simplified seismic design procedures. Earthq. Spectra 22(3), 663–692 (2006)
Harden, C.W., Hutchinson, T.C.: Beam-on-nonlinear-winkler-foundation modeling of shallow, rocking-dominated footings. Earthq. Spectra 25(2), 277–300 (2009)
Boore, D.M.: Orientation-independent, nongeometric-mean measures of seismic intensity from two horizontal components of motion. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 100(4), 1830–1835 (2010)
Bozorgnia, Y., et al.: NGA-West2 research project. Earthq. Spectra 30(3), 973–987 (2014)
Pedregosa, F., et al.: Scikit-learn: machine learning in Python. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 12, 2825–2830 (2011)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Baquero, JS., Bairan, JM., Ledesma, A. (2023). On the Seismic Design of Ductile RC Buildings Considering Soil-Structure Interaction Effects. In: Di Trapani, F., Demartino, C., Marano, G.C., Monti, G. (eds) Proceedings of the 2022 Eurasian OpenSees Days. EOS 2022. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 326. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-30125-4_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-30125-4_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-30124-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-30125-4
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)