Abstract
Focal disturbances in the cerebral activity modulated by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) produce alterations in brain connectivity at the global level. Those effects can be studied using time-varying functional connectivity (TVFC) based on functional magnetic resonance imaging at rest (rs-fMRI). The characteristics of these alterations could be modeled using machine learning algorithms for patient classification. This study used hidden Markov models (HMM) to evaluate temporal variations in functional connectivity after stimulation of two different brain areas (Frontal and Occipital). We modeled the dynamics of 15 resting-state networks in 12 states by calculating the fractional occupancy, mean lifetime, and interval time of each state. We then compared the difference between fMRI sessions, PRE, and POST-stimulus, observing significant differences for both conditions, especially after frontal stimulation. Finally, generative models based on HMM were trained, to classify PRE-stimulus and Occipital stimulus with an accuracy of 83%, PRE-stimulus and Frontal stimulus with an accuracy of 85%, and Occipital and Frontal stimulus with 65% accuracy. This finding could be extended to the characterization of pathologies where local disturbances have a global impact on functional connectivity, such as Epilepsy.
J. Arias-Londoño—started this work at the Antioquia University and finished it supported by a María Zambrano grant from the Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Spain.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
References
Abela, E., Rummel, C., Hauf, M., Weisstanner, C., Schindler, K., Wiest, R.: Neuroimaging of epilepsy: lesions, networks, oscillations. Clin. Neuroradiol. 24(1), 5–15 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00062-014-0284-8
Castrillon, G., Sollmann, N., Kurcyus, K., Razi, A., Krieg, S.M., Riedl, V.: The physiological effects of noninvasive brain stimulation fundamentally differ across the human cortex. Sci. Adv. 6 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aay2739
Elshoff, L., et al.: Dynamic imaging of coherent sources reveals different network connectivity underlying the generation and perpetuation of epileptic seizures. PLoS ONE 8, 1–11 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0078422
Fox, M.D., Halko, M.A., Eldaief, M.C., Pascual-Leone, A.: Measuring and manipulating brain connectivity with resting state functional connectivity magnetic resonance imaging (fcMRI) and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). NeuroImage 62, 2232–2243 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.03.035, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.03.035
Gollo, L.L., Roberts, J.A., Cocchi, L.: Mapping how local perturbations influence systems-level brain dynamics. NeuroImage 160, 97–112 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.01.057, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.01.057
Goyal, C.: Deep understanding of discriminative and generative models (2021). https://www.analyticsvidhya.com/blog/2021/07/deep-understanding-of-discriminative-and-generative-models-in-machine-learning/
He, T., et al.: Meta-matching as a simple framework to translate phenotypic predictive models from big to small data. Nat. Neurosci. 25(6), 795–804 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-022-01059-9, https://www.nature.com/articles/s41593-022-01059-9
Hussain, S., Langley, J., Seitz, A.R., Peters, M.A.K., Hu, X.P.: A novel hidden Markov approach to studying dynamic functional connectivity states in human neuroimaging. bioRxiv, p. 2022.02.02.478844 (2022). https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.02.02.478844v1
Kottaram, A., et al.: Brain network dynamics in schizophrenia: reduced dynamism of the default mode network. Hum. Brain Mapp. 40, 2212 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1002/HBM.24519, https://aplicacionesbiblioteca.udea.edu.co:2054/pmc/articles/PMC6917018/
Lurie, D.J., et al.: Questions and controversies in the study of time-varying functional connectivity in resting fMRI. Netw. Neurosci. 4, 30–69 (2020)
Matsubara, T.: Bayesian deep learning: a model-based interpretable approach. Nonlinear Theory Appl. IEICE 11, 16–35 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1587/NOLTA.11.16
Opitz, A., Fox, M.D., Craddock, R.C., Colcombe, S., Milham, M.P.: An integrated framework for targeting functional networks via transcranial magnetic stimulation. NeuroImage 127, 86–96 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.NEUROIMAGE.2015.11.040, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26608241/
Polanía, R., Nitsche, M.A., Ruff, C.C.: Studying and modifying brain function with non-invasive brain stimulation. Nat. Neurosci. 21, 174–187 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-017-0054-4, http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41593-017-0054-4
Rabiner, L.: A tutorial on hidden markov models and selected applications in speech recognition. Proc. IEEE 77, 257–286 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1109/5.18626, http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/18626/
Sack, A.T., Kadosh, R.C., Schuhmann, T., Moerel, M., Walsh, V., Goebel, R.: Optimizing functional accuracy of TMS in cognitive studies: a comparison of methods, pp. 1–15 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2009.21126
Schaefer, A., et al.: Local-global parcellation of the human cerebral cortex from intrinsic functional connectivity MRI. Cereb. Cortex 28, 3095–3114 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhx179
Sliwinska, M.W., Vitello, S., Devlin, J.T.: Transcranial magnetic stimulation for investigating causal brain-behavioral relationships and their time course. J. Vis. Exp. JoVE (2014). https://doi.org/10.3791/51735, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25079670, http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=PMC4219631
Varoquaux, G.: Cross-validation failure: small sample sizes lead to large error bars. Neuroimage 180, 68–77 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.06.061
Vidaurre, D.: A new model for simultaneous dimensionality reduction and time-varying functional connectivity estimation. PLoS Comput. Biol. 17, 1–20 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008580, http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008580
Vidaurre, D., Smith, S.M., Woolrich, M.W.: Brain network dynamics are hierarchically organized in time. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 114, 12827–12832 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1705120114
Yeo, B.T.T., et al.: The organization of the human cerebral cortex estimated by intrinsic functional connectivity. J. Neurophysiol. 106, 1125–1165 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00338.2011
Zhang, G., et al.: Estimating dynamic functional brain connectivity with a sparse hidden Markov model. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 39, 488–498 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2019.2929959
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Bustamante, C., Castrillón, G., Arias-Londoño, J. (2023). Classification of Focused Perturbations Using Time-Variant Functional Connectivity with rs-fmri. In: Orjuela-Cañón, A.D., Lopez, J., Arias-Londoño, J.D., Figueroa-García, J.C. (eds) Applications of Computational Intelligence. ColCACI 2022. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1746. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-29783-0_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-29783-0_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-29782-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-29783-0
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)