Abstract
Social humanism is a political philosophy that neatly sidesteps the issue of individualism v. collectivism in political theory. From the point of view of people living in an established society, it is individualistic. A social humanist believes that we all have a right to choose how we are going to live from the range of alternatives that are plausibly available to us, and plan our lives accordingly. In this sense it is individualistic. But this does not mean that we are free to live as we please, according to our own lights. For our rights and responsibilities as members of society, or as occupants of various social or political positions in society, should be collectively, not individually, determined. Social humanism is therefore politically individualistic, but methodologically collectivist. It is politically individualistic because it supports positive liberty, and therefore individualism, as a political ideal. But it is methodologically collectivist in social and political theory, because it argues that answers to questions of social or political responsibility cannot normally be derived from answers to questions about how the individuals who make up society should behave.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
For a proof that G.E. Moore’s retrospective act-utilitarianism is deeply flawed, see Castañeda, 1969. For a proof that prospective act-utilitarianism is also flawed, although in a different way, see Feldman, 1974, and Ellis, 1981. The case for what I once called ‘strategic’ utilitarianism, which is a precursor to social humanism, is set out in Ellis, 1981.
- 2.
For a proof of this, refer to Social Humanism, ch, 1.7 pp 34–38.
References
Castañeda, H-N (1969): ‘Ought, Value and Utilitarianism’, American Philosophical Quarterly 6, pp. 257–275.
Ellis, B. D. (2001): Scientific Essentialism. Cambridge; Cambridge University Press.
Feldman, F. (1974): ‘World Utilitarianism’, in K. Lehrer (ed.) Analysis and Metaphysics. Dordrecht, Holland; Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 1951.
Mandelbaum, M (1955) The Phenomenology of Moral Experience Glenicoe Il
Moore, G.E. (1912): Ethics. London; Oxford University Press, 1966.
Scott, K.J. (1973): ‘Methodological and Epistemological Individualism’, in J. O’Neill ed. (1973), pp. 215–220.
Sidgwick, H. (1907): Methods of Ethics. Seventh edition. London; Macmillan, 1962.
Smart, J. J. C. (1963): Philosophy and Scientific Realism. London; Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Ellis, B. D. (1981): ‘Retrospective and Prospective Utilitarianism’. Nous 15: 325–328. Wiley.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ellis, B. (2023). Individualism. In: On Civilizing Capitalism. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-29681-9_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-29681-9_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-29680-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-29681-9
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)