Skip to main content

Individualism

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
On Civilizing Capitalism
  • 78 Accesses

Abstract

Social humanism is a political philosophy that neatly sidesteps the issue of individualism v. collectivism in political theory. From the point of view of people living in an established society, it is individualistic. A social humanist believes that we all have a right to choose how we are going to live from the range of alternatives that are plausibly available to us, and plan our lives accordingly. In this sense it is individualistic. But this does not mean that we are free to live as we please, according to our own lights. For our rights and responsibilities as members of society, or as occupants of various social or political positions in society, should be collectively, not individually, determined. Social humanism is therefore politically individualistic, but methodologically collectivist. It is politically individualistic because it supports positive liberty, and therefore individualism, as a political ideal. But it is methodologically collectivist in social and political theory, because it argues that answers to questions of social or political responsibility cannot normally be derived from answers to questions about how the individuals who make up society should behave.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For a proof that G.E. Moore’s retrospective act-utilitarianism is deeply flawed, see Castañeda, 1969. For a proof that prospective act-utilitarianism is also flawed, although in a different way, see Feldman, 1974, and Ellis, 1981. The case for what I once called ‘strategic’ utilitarianism, which is a precursor to social humanism, is set out in Ellis, 1981.

  2. 2.

    For a proof of this, refer to Social Humanism, ch, 1.7 pp 34–38.

References

  • Castañeda, H-N (1969): ‘Ought, Value and Utilitarianism’, American Philosophical Quarterly 6, pp. 257–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, B. D. (2001): Scientific Essentialism. Cambridge; Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, F. (1974): ‘World Utilitarianism’, in K. Lehrer (ed.) Analysis and Metaphysics. Dordrecht, Holland; Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 1951.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandelbaum, M (1955) The Phenomenology of Moral Experience Glenicoe Il

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, G.E. (1912): Ethics. London; Oxford University Press, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, K.J. (1973): ‘Methodological and Epistemological Individualism’, in J. O’Neill ed. (1973), pp. 215–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sidgwick, H. (1907): Methods of Ethics. Seventh edition. London; Macmillan, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smart, J. J. C. (1963): Philosophy and Scientific Realism. London; Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, B. D. (1981): ‘Retrospective and Prospective Utilitarianism’. Nous 15: 325–328. Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ellis, B. (2023). Individualism. In: On Civilizing Capitalism. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-29681-9_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics