Skip to main content

Predicting, Controlling, and Engineering Humans: Eugenic Sciences in American Psychology

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Ideological and Political Bias in Psychology

Abstract

Since its inception as a distinct academic and professional discipline in the USA, American psychology has drawn on sciences that were mired in ideologies of social Darwinism and eugenics. Eugenics, itself defined as a “science of human betterment” or “science of racial betterment,” is primarily remembered for its centrality to Nazi policies of racial purification (e.g., violent anti-Semitism) as well as similarly inhumane treatments of people with disabilities and sexual minorities. However, eugenics and its application were also integrated with scientific practices central to the emerging field of psychology, especially fields’ focus on intelligence, emotional self-control, or gender conformity as evidence of evolutionary fitness (i.e., evolutionary superiority and inferiority). In turn the public and social leaders used American psychology eugenic-based works to uphold problematic and socially unjust (e.g., racist, homophobic, sexist, xenophobic, ableist, classist) policies and practices. Thus, leading American psychologists utilized eugenics as a framework for promoting psychology as a scientific tool for supposedly predicting, controlling, and socially engineering not just human individual behavior but American society at large with significant negative social impact. This chapter documents past and present-day uses of eugenic-based psychological approaches in U.S.-based psychology as a discipline.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anti-Defamation League. (2019). When women are the enemy: The intersection of misogyny and white supremacy. Online report retrieved on August 24, 2019 at https://www.adl.org/resources/reports/when-women-are-the-enemy-the-intersection-of-misogyny-and-white-supremacy#involuntary-celibates-deadly-resentments

  • Bannister, R. (2010). Social Darwinism: Science and myth in Anglo-American social thought. Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bashford, A., & Levine, P. (Eds.). (2010). The Oxford handbook of the history of eugenics. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, E. (2003). War against the weak: Eugenics and America’s campaign to create a master race. Four Walls Eight Windows.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brigham, C. C. (1923). A study of American intelligence. Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cattell, R. B. (1987). Beyondism: Religion from science. Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesterton, G. K. (1922). Eugenics and other evils: An argument against the scientifically organized state. Inkling Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C. (1871). The descent of man and selection in relation to sex. Murray.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Davenport, C. B. (1910). Eugenics. The science of human improvement by better breeding. Henry Holt.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Beauvoir, S. (1949). The second sex. (H.M. Parshley, Trans., 1974). Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duke, D. E. (1999). My awakening: A path to racial understanding. Free Speech Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eugenical News. (1916-1922). Monthly publication of the eugenics record office, Cold Springs, NY. Retrieved on February 22, 2018 at https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?Id=coo.31924063788834

  • Fanon, F. (1959/2008). Black skin, white masks. Grove Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R. A. (1924). The elimination of mental defect. Eugenics Review, 16, 114–116.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Fleischfresser, S. (2019). Is this “One of the worst scientific scandals of all time?” Hans Eysenck comes under fire-again for scientific scandal. Retrieved at https://cosmosmagazine.com/people/society/is-this-one-of-the-worstscientific-scandals-of-all-time/

  • Galton, F. (1865). Hereditary talent and character. Macmillan’s Magazine, 12(157–166), 318–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galton, F. (1869). Hereditary genius: An inquiry into its laws and consequences. Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Galton, F. (1883). Inquiries into human faculty and its development. Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galton, F. (1904). Eugenics: Its definition, scope, and aims. American Journal of Sociology, 10(1), 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galton, F. (1907). Probability: The Foundation of Eugenics. Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrett, H. E. (1961). The equalitarian dogma. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 4, 480–484.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goddard, H. H. (1910). Heredity of feeble-mindedness. The Eugenic Review, 1(4), 46–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goddard, H. H. (1911). The elimination of feeble-mindedness. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 37(2), 261–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goddard, H. H. (1912). The Kallikak family: A study in the heredity of feeble-mindedness. Macmillan Company.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Goddard, H. H. (1920). Human efficiency and levels of intelligence. Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goddard, H. H. (1948). Our children in the atomic age. Hopkins Sydicate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gosney, E. S., & Popenoe, P. B. (1929). Sterilization for human betterment: A summary of results of 6,000 operations in California, 1909–1929. Pasadena, CA: Human Betterment Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottfredson, L. S. (1994). Egalitarian fiction and collective fraud. Society, 31(3), 53–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gottfredson, L. S. (1996). Rushton (1994) race, evolution and behavior: A life history perspective. Politics and the Life Sciences, Book Reviews, 15, 141–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gottfredson, L. S. (2012). Resolute ignorance on race and Rushton. Personality and Individual Differences, 55, 218–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.10.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S. J. (1996). The mismeasure of man. W.W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guthrie, R. V. (2004). Even the rat was white: A historical view of psychology (2nd ed.). Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guyer, M. F. (1916). Being well-born. Bobbs-Merrill Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, G. S. (1903). The white man’s burden versus indigenous development of the lower races. The Journal of Education, 58(4,1438), 83–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, G. S. (1906). Question of co-education. Munsey, 34, 588–683.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, G. S. (1910). Education in sex-hygiene. The Eugenics Review, 1(5), 242–253.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, G. S. (1917). Practical relations between psychology and the war. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1(1), 9–16. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0070238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, G. S. (1920). The Fall of Atlantis. In G. S. Hall, Recreations of a psychologist (pp. 1–127). D Appleton & Company. https://doi.org/10.1037/14207-001

  • Herrnstein, R. J., & Murray, C. (1996). The bell curve. Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, G. W. (1914). A civic biology: Presented in problems. American Book.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, W. S., & Sommermier, E. (1922). The relation of degree of Indian blood to score on the Otis intelligence test. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 2(3), 257–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurlock, E. B. (1927). Color preferences of white and negro children. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 7(6), 389–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kellicott, W. E. (1915). The social direction of human evolution: An outline of the science of eugenics. New York: D. Appleton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhl, S. (2002). The Nazi connection: Eugenics, American racism, and German national socialism. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin, R. C., Rose, S., & Kamin, L. J. (1984). Not in our genes: Biology, ideology, and human nature. Pantheon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lippmann, W. (1922). The mental age of Americans. New Republic, 32, (412–417), 213–215, 246–248, 275–277, 297–298, 328–330, 9–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lombardo, P. A. (Ed.). (2011). A century of eugenics in America: From the Indiana experiment to the human genome era. Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDougall, W. (1914). Psychology in the service of eugenics. The Eugenics Review, 5(4), 295.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Melendy, M. R. (1914). The science of eugenics and sex life. W. R. Vansant.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morawski, J. G. (1982). Assessing psychology’s moral heritage through our neglected utopias. American Psychologist, 37(10), 1082.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nearing, S. (1912). The super race: An american problem. BW Huebsch.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, K. (1905). National life from the standpoint of science. Adam and Black.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, K. (1911). The scope and importance to the state of the science of national eugenics. Dulau and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickren, W., & Rutherford, A. (2010). A history of modern psychology in context. John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickren, W. E., & Rutherford, A. (Eds.). (2018). 125 years of the American Psychological Association. American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinker, S. (2002). The blank slate: The modern denial of human nature. Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinker, S. (2018). Enlightenment now: The case for reason, science, humanism, and progress. Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popenoe, P., & Johnson, R. H. (1935). Applied eugenics (3d. ed.). Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rushton, J. P. (1994). Race, evolution, and behavior. Transaction.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rushton, J. P. (2002). The Pioneer Fund and the scientific study of human differences. Albany Law Review, 66, 207–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saini, A. (2019). Superior: The return of race science. Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, D. P., & Schultz, S. E. (2015). A history of modern psychology. Cengage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selden, S. (1999). Inheriting shame: The story of eugenics and racism in America. Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shannon, T. W., & Truitt, W. J. (1916). Nature’s secrets revealed: Scientific knowledge of the laws of sex life and heredity, or, eugenics. SA Mullikin Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. (1985). Minds made feeble: The myth and legacy of Kallikaks. Aspen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. D., & Wehmeyer, M. L. (2012). Who Was Deborah Kallikak? Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 50(2), 169–178.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Southern Poverty Law Center. (2017). From eugenics to voter ID laws: Thomas Farr’s connection to the Pioneer Fund. Retrieved on June 15, 2018 at https://www.splcenter.org/hatewatch/2017/12/04

  • Stern, A. M. (2015). Eugenic nation: Faults and frontiers of better breeding in modern America. University of California Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sunne, D. (1917). A comparative study of white and negro children. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1(1), 71–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Pioneer Fund. (2013). Highlights of Pioneer Fund Research and Grants. Retrieved on June 15, 2018 at https://web.archive.org/web/20130103005545/http://www.pioneerfund.org:80

  • Tucker, W. H. (1996). The science and politics of racial research. University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, W. H. (2002). The funding of scientific racism: Wickliffe Draper and the Pioneer Fund. University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, R. T., Teo, T., & Baydala, A. (2014). A critical history and philosophy of psychology: Diversity of context, thought, and practice. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, J. B. (1914). Behavior: An introduction to comparative psychology. H. Holt.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, J. B. (1919). Psychology: From the standpoint of a behaviorist. Lippincott.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, J. B. (1928). Psychological care of infant and child. WW Norton & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, J. B. (1930). Behaviorism (Rev. ed.). W W Norton & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, J. B., & Lashley, K. S. (1922). A psychological study of motion pictures in relation to venereal disease campaigns. United States Interdepartmental Social Hygiene Board.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weikart, R. (2004). From Darwin to Hitler: Evolutionary ethics, eugenics, and racism in Germany. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Whitney, G. (1997). Raymond B. Cattell and the fourth inquisition. The Mankind Quarterly, 38(1&2), 99–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitney, G. (1999). Introduction. In D. E. Duke (Ed.), My awakening: A path to racial understanding (pp. 2–11). Free speech press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yakushko, O. (2018). Modern-day xenophobia: Critical historical and theoretical perspectives on the roots of anti-immigrant prejudice. Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Yakushko, O. (2019a). Eugenics and its evolution in the history of western psychology: A critical archival review. Psychotherapy and Politics International, e1495.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yakushko, O. (2019b). Scientific Pollyannaism: From inquisition to positive psychology. Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Yerkes, R. M. (Ed.). (1920). Psychological examining in the United States Army. Washington Government Printing Office: Memoirs of the National Academic of Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yerkes, R. M. (1907). The dancing mouse: A study in animal behavior (Vol. 1). Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yerkes, R. M. (1921). Psychological examining in the United States Army: Edited by robert M. Yerkes (Vol. 15). US Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yerkes, R. M. (1923). Eugenic bearing of measurements of intelligence. The Eugenics Review, 14(4), 225–229.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Young, P. C. (1929). Intelligence and suggestibility in whites and negroes. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 9(5), 339–359. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0075409

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Yakushko, O. (2023). Predicting, Controlling, and Engineering Humans: Eugenic Sciences in American Psychology. In: Frisby, C.L., Redding, R.E., O'Donohue, W.T., Lilienfeld, S.O. (eds) Ideological and Political Bias in Psychology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-29148-7_24

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics