Skip to main content

Question

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Sociology of the Next Society

Abstract

In the problem situation of globalization research since the 1990s, the German sociologists Beck, Münch, and Willke, for example, have reacted to the changed situation of theory formation and research through the resystematization of Western modernization (Beck 1986, 1993; Beck and Bonss 2001; Münch 1998, 2001a, b; Willke 1997, 2001, 2002, 2003). Sociologists classify “basic institutions” or institutional orders with organizational principles, which are institutionalized in the course of the modernization of social support layers. They have to meet the requirement that they restabilize themselves as “structures” and a “differential order formation” under certain historical framework and initial conditions. It is not a question of the word “organizational principles,” but of the problem-related relationship with the classification of institutions, which do not vary freely in the time dimension and must be reversible. An example is the kinship system and the institutionalization of the codes of the functional systems. The authors mentioned different background assumptions and research programs in sociological theory when analyzing the basic institutions and structures. However, they share the point of reference to grasp the changed starting point that has been emerging for all social systems since the beginning of the 1990s as a result of the processes of globalization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This Luhmann’s version of risk and danger is the return.

  2. 2.

    For an overview of the general criteria for distinction between First modernization, reflexive modernization, and postmodernism, see Beck and Bonss (2001, 41).

Bibliography

  • Beck, Ulrich. 1986. Risikogesellschaft. Auf dem Weg in eine andere Moderne. Berlin: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, Ulrich. 1993. Die Erfindung des Politischen. Berlin: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, Ulrich, and Wolfgang Bonss, eds. 2001. Die Modernisierung der Modernisierung. Berlin: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koselleck, Reinhart. 1979a. Einleitung, XV. In Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe, ed. Otto Brunner, Werner Conze, and Reinhart Koselleck, vol. 1. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Münch, Richard. 1998. Globale Dynamik, lokale Lebenswelten. Der schwierige Weg in die Weltgesellschaft. Berlin: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Münch, Richard. 2001a. Offene Räume. Soziale Integration diesseits und jenseits des Nationalstaat. Berlin: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Münch, Richard. 2001b. Die neue Arbeitsgesellschaft. In Politik des 21. Jahrhunderts, ed. Claus Leggewie and Richard Münch, 51–74. Berlin: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilly, Charles. 1993. European revolutions 1492–1992. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willke, Helmut. 1997. Supervision des Staates. Berlin: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willke, Helmut. 2001. Atopia. Studien zur atopischen Gesellschaft. Berlin: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willke, Helmut. 2002. Dystopia. Studien zur Krisis des Wissens in der modernen Gesellschaft. Berlin: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willke, Helmut. 2003. Heterotopia. Studien zur Krisis der Ordnung moderner Gesellschaften. Berlin: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Preyer, G., Krausse, RM. (2023). Question. In: Sociology of the Next Society. Emerging Globalities and Civilizational Perspectives. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-29140-1_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-29140-1_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-29139-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-29140-1

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics