Abstract
In the problem situation of globalization research since the 1990s, the German sociologists Beck, Münch, and Willke, for example, have reacted to the changed situation of theory formation and research through the resystematization of Western modernization (Beck 1986, 1993; Beck and Bonss 2001; Münch 1998, 2001a, b; Willke 1997, 2001, 2002, 2003). Sociologists classify “basic institutions” or institutional orders with organizational principles, which are institutionalized in the course of the modernization of social support layers. They have to meet the requirement that they restabilize themselves as “structures” and a “differential order formation” under certain historical framework and initial conditions. It is not a question of the word “organizational principles,” but of the problem-related relationship with the classification of institutions, which do not vary freely in the time dimension and must be reversible. An example is the kinship system and the institutionalization of the codes of the functional systems. The authors mentioned different background assumptions and research programs in sociological theory when analyzing the basic institutions and structures. However, they share the point of reference to grasp the changed starting point that has been emerging for all social systems since the beginning of the 1990s as a result of the processes of globalization.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
This Luhmann’s version of risk and danger is the return.
- 2.
For an overview of the general criteria for distinction between First modernization, reflexive modernization, and postmodernism, see Beck and Bonss (2001, 41).
Bibliography
Beck, Ulrich. 1986. Risikogesellschaft. Auf dem Weg in eine andere Moderne. Berlin: Suhrkamp.
Beck, Ulrich. 1993. Die Erfindung des Politischen. Berlin: Suhrkamp.
Beck, Ulrich, and Wolfgang Bonss, eds. 2001. Die Modernisierung der Modernisierung. Berlin: Suhrkamp.
Koselleck, Reinhart. 1979a. Einleitung, XV. In Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe, ed. Otto Brunner, Werner Conze, and Reinhart Koselleck, vol. 1. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.
Münch, Richard. 1998. Globale Dynamik, lokale Lebenswelten. Der schwierige Weg in die Weltgesellschaft. Berlin: Suhrkamp.
Münch, Richard. 2001a. Offene Räume. Soziale Integration diesseits und jenseits des Nationalstaat. Berlin: Suhrkamp.
Münch, Richard. 2001b. Die neue Arbeitsgesellschaft. In Politik des 21. Jahrhunderts, ed. Claus Leggewie and Richard Münch, 51–74. Berlin: Suhrkamp.
Tilly, Charles. 1993. European revolutions 1492–1992. Oxford: Blackwell.
Willke, Helmut. 1997. Supervision des Staates. Berlin: Suhrkamp.
Willke, Helmut. 2001. Atopia. Studien zur atopischen Gesellschaft. Berlin: Suhrkamp.
Willke, Helmut. 2002. Dystopia. Studien zur Krisis des Wissens in der modernen Gesellschaft. Berlin: Suhrkamp.
Willke, Helmut. 2003. Heterotopia. Studien zur Krisis der Ordnung moderner Gesellschaften. Berlin: Suhrkamp.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Preyer, G., Krausse, RM. (2023). Question. In: Sociology of the Next Society. Emerging Globalities and Civilizational Perspectives. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-29140-1_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-29140-1_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-29139-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-29140-1
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)