Skip to main content

Transitional Situation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Sociology of the Next Society

Abstract

Globalization has become not only a topic of economic, political, sociological, and anthropological research, but also a source of intense debate within the larger public. In the German context, it is not rare to find employers’ associations that advocate deregulation for companies to better withstand global competitive pressures. At the same time, widespread opposition to globalization often rests on fears of unbridled capitalism and hopes for greater regulatory mechanisms vis-à-vis financial markets, as well as the preservation and continuation of the traditional welfare state post-World War II.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    On the conceptual history of the “revolutionary concept” from reading as a “cycle” to a political concept of struggle: Koselleck (1979b).

  2. 2.

    On the concept of connectivity and its (new) relevance: Part I, Chap. 3, in this book.

Bibliography

  • Axford, Barrie. 2018. The world-making power of new media. Mere connection? Routledge studies in global and transnational politics. Series editors Chris Rumford and Sandra Halperin. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baecker, Dirk. 2007. Studien zur nächsten Gesellschaft. Berlin: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, Thomas L. 2006. Die Welt ist flach. Berlin: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, Anthony. 2001. Entfesselte Welt. Wie die Globalisierung unser Leben verändert. Berlin: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koselleck, Reinhard. 1979b. Historische Kriterien des neuzeitlichen Revolutionsbegriffs. In Vergangene Zukunft. Zur Semantik geschichtlicher Zeiten, 67–87. Berlin: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, Niklas . 1997. Die Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft (2 Bd.). Berlin: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • MittelstraĂź, JĂĽrgen. 1992. Leonardo-Welt. Ăśber Wissenschaft, Forschung und Verantwortung. Berlin: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nederveen Pieterse, Jan. 2004. Globalization and culture. Global mĂ©lange. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, Roland. 1992a. After nostalgia? Wilful nostalgia and the phases of globalization. In Theories of modernity and postmodernity, ed. Brayn S. Turner, 3rd ed., 45–61. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandywell, Barry. 2011. A dictionary of visual discourse: A dialectical lexicon. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Preyer, G., Krausse, RM. (2023). Transitional Situation. In: Sociology of the Next Society. Emerging Globalities and Civilizational Perspectives. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-29140-1_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-29140-1_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-29139-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-29140-1

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics