Abstract
How far can one proceed with quantum formalism in modeling psychological effects? It is clear that each theory has its own domain of applicability. By borrowing the formalism of quantum mechanics (QM) and applying it in psychology, cognitive, social, and political sciences, one has to be aware that once he might approach the boundary of applicability of this formalism. The special attention must be paid to quantum-like merging of different psychological effects. To illustrate the problem of effects’ merging, consider distinguishing of classical statistical physics and QM via the Bell type experiments. For each pair of experimental settings, the experimental data can be described by classical probability theory. But, the combination of the experimental situations corresponding to selections of a few pairs of setting leads to a deviation from classical probability (in the form of the violation of the Bell inequalities). This example is of only illustrative value. Here we speak about impossibility to combine a few experimental contexts. A psychological effect is a class of experimental contexts. So, the question is about possibility to merge a few special classes of contexts. A few years ago it was found (by Khrennikov, Basieva, Dzhafarov, and Busemeyer) that one of the basic psychological effects, namely, the question order effect, cannot be integrated with the response replicability effect in the framework of von Neumann measurement theory, i.e., representation of observables (questions, tasks) by Hermitian operators and state updates by projections. (Refined said, we consider quantum instruments of the von Neumann-Lüders class.) In this chapter, we finally present this result which has already been so often discussed in the previous chapters.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
These are observables of the von Neumann type, see Chaps. 16 and 8. As we know from theory of quantum instruments, it is not enough to determine observables and, hence, the probabilities of their outcomes. We also have to determine the form of the state update resulting from measurement’s feedback action; in this chapter it is given by Lüders postulate. Refined said, we consider quantum instruments of the von Neumann-Lüders class (Chap. 8, Sect. 8.1).
- 2.
For simplicity, we assume throughout the chapter that the system is always in a pure state. A more general mixed state is represented by a density matrix, which is essentially a set of up to n distinct pure states occurring with some probabilities. The same as with the assumption that n is finite, the restriction of our analysis to pure states is not critical.
- 3.
However, this precaution seems unnecessary, as the results of the experiments with feedback in Ref. [31] do not qualitatively differ from the ones we discuss here.
- 4.
Probabilities are either experimental or quantum-theoretical; the reader can assign to them the meaning depending on contexts.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Khrennikov, A.Y. (2023). No-Go Theorem for Modeling with Von Neumann Observables. In: Open Quantum Systems in Biology, Cognitive and Social Sciences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-29024-4_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-29024-4_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-29023-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-29024-4
eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)