Skip to main content

“Lines of Flight”: The Deterritorialization of Gilles Deleuze

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Contemporary Writer and Their Suicide
  • 266 Accesses

Abstract

French philosopher Gilles Deleuze died by suicide at the age of 70. His suicide occurred amidst a chronic struggle with a worsening respiratory illness that made daily life difficult. Because his suicide can be so directly connected to his diagnosis, even established organizations like the American Psychiatric Association would view it as a reasonable, nonpathological end to a life “no longer worth living.” There is, then, no need to look further for “clues” or to ask “why” regarding his death. Further, Deleuze himself believed that to read the work of counterculture authors and seek out “anguish, solitude, guilt […] the whole tragedy of interiority” represents “decadence and degeneracy,” signaling the “masochistic impulses of the academic.” In this chapter, therefore, I seek out in his work clues for managing a suicidal subjectivity. I argue that within his conceptualization of rhizomatic lines of flight with Felix Guattari in A Thousand Plateaus, as well as within three posthumously published volumes that offer further elaboration of the relationship between his life and his philosophy, Deleuze makes space for suicide as an exit from contemporary power relations. By offering the suicidal subjectivity opportunities for not-being and contextualizing feelings of madness, Deleuze offers tools for self-analysis that enable one to work through feelings of suicidality without being stigmatized or pathologized.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Although it is not my project, I must take a moment to briefly note how Deleuze’s contemporaries attempted to reconcile his suicide with his philosophy. For the most part, attempts were made by journalists and philosophers to rationalize his suicide within his works. Beaulieu and Ord (2017) push back against this history and against arguments that Deleuze’s death by suicide is a contradiction to his philosophy. They argue that his suicide is, instead, an affirmation of life and vitalism: Deleuze manifesting the infinite. I am inclined to align with interpretations of his suicide such as that presented by Colombat, which assert that that for Deleuze, death comes from the outside, “because the act of living is necessarily opened to the outside, on new becomings and metamorphoses. Suicide itself can be, in this specific context, a very positive, concrete and philosophical act of assertion, a ‘vital aphorism’ and an ‘anecdote of thought.’ At the moment of death, the individual rejoins the ‘empty shape of time,’ the ‘perpetuum mobile,’ the ‘aleatory point’” (1996, p. 246). I also argue, in line with others, that there is much that Deleuze’s philosophy can teach about suicide (e.g., Woodward, 2007), while regarding his own suicide as simple matter-of-fact.

  2. 2.

    Particularly to the end of one’s measurable, biological life. This is distinct from the Deleuzean notion of “a life,” which is indefinite in its immanence: “a life” exists beyond the life of the individual and is populated by singularities that constitute the event known as life (Deleuze, 2005).

  3. 3.

    Indeed, data consistently show that those diagnosed with schizophrenia and bipolar disorder are more likely to die by suicide (Schmutte et al., 2021).

References

  • American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. American Psychiatric Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Baudrillard, J. (1994). Simulacra and simulation. University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beaulieu, A., & Ord, D. (2017). The death of Gilles Deleuze as composition of a concept. Deleuze Studies, 11(1), 121–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colombat, A. P. (1996). November 4, 1995: Deleuze’s death as an event. Man and the World, 29, 235–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G. (2004a). Capitalism and schizophrenia. In D. Lapoujade (Ed.), Desert islands and other texts, 1953–1974 (pp. 232–241). Semiotext(e).

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G. (2004b). Nomadic thought. In D. Lapoujade (Ed.), Desert islands and other texts, 1953–1974 (pp. 252–261). Semiotext(e).

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G. (2004c). On capitalism and desire. In D. Lapoujade (Ed.), Desert islands and other texts, 1953–1974 (pp. 262–273). Semiotext(e).

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G. (2005). Immanence: A life. In Pure immanence: Essays on a life (pp. 25–33). Zone Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G. (2007). For Félix. In D. Lapoujade (Ed.), Two regimes of madness: Texts and interviews 1975–1995 (pp. 286–287). Semiotext(e).

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G. (2020). Letter to François Châtelet. In D. Lapoujade (Ed.), Letters and other texts (pp. 26–30). Semiotext(e).

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1996). The simplest of pleasures. In S. Lotringer (Ed.), Foucault live (Interviews, 1961–1984) (pp. 295–297). Semiotext(e).

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (2004). Intellectuals and power. In D. Lapoujade (Ed.), Desert islands and other texts, 1953–1974 (pp. 206–213). Semiotext(e).

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (2010). Civilization and its discontents. W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Group for Information on Prisons. (2004). HM.’s letters. In D. Lapoujade (Ed.), Desert islands and other texts, 1953–1974 (pp. 244–246). Semiotext(e).

    Google Scholar 

  • Moten, F. (2013). The general antagonism: An interview with Stevphen Shukaitis. In S. Harney & F. Moten (Eds.), The undercommons: Fugitive planning and black study (pp. 100–159). Minor Compositions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, I. (2018). Vexy thing: On gender and liberation. Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schmutte, T., Costa, M., Hammer, P., & Davidson, L. (2021). Comparisons between suicide in persons with serious mental illness, other mental disorders, or no known mental illness: Results from 37 U.S. states, 2003–2017. Schizophrenia Research, 228, 74–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Whitney, C. R. (1995, November 7). Gilles Deleuze, 70, French professor and author. New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/1995/11/07/world/gilles-deleuze-70-french-professor-and-author.html

  • Woodward, A. (2007). Chapter 3: Deleuze and suicide. In A. H. Moody & P. Malins (Eds.), Deleuzian encounters: Studies in contemporary social issues. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alison Parks .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Parks, A. (2023). “Lines of Flight”: The Deterritorialization of Gilles Deleuze. In: Ros Velasco, J. (eds) The Contemporary Writer and Their Suicide. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-28982-8_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics