Skip to main content

Methodology of Land Use Priorities and Conflicts Study

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Methodological Approaches in Integrated Geography

Part of the book series: Springer Texts in Social Sciences ((STSS))

  • 133 Accesses

Abstract

Studies based on land uses are essential in order to carry forward development-oriented studies in any part of the world. Land use denotes how land is utilized to provide things and services. The land use of an area will not remain the same throughout all times. Changes will keep on occurring in land use from time to time on the basis of quantities and acreage. Change in land use is only an outcome of the interaction between man and environment. As rapid developmental activities are going on, following resettlements in the Northern Province of Sri Lanka, changes are also taking place also in land use. Since too many changes are occurring within a short period, it becomes necessary to find out the priorities and controversial issues therein. Thus, the object of this study is to find out the priorities and conflicts in the land use found along selected river basins (Kanagarayanaru, Peraru and Paliaru) in Northern Sri Lanka. Primary and secondary data have been obtained for this study. Geographical Information System in addition to polymorphic analysis method has also been used to co-ordinate and evaluate the agricultural, settlement and environmental priorities. It is important to calculate the weightage for the classes of factors that influence the co-ordination of agricultural, settlement and environmental priorities, using the process of step-by-step analysis. Saaty’s (Saaty and Vargas, 1991) comparative scale has been used for the process of step-by-step analysis. Pairwise comparison system has been used to evaluate the weighing of factors and thereby land use priorities and conflicts have been calculated. Weighting values were issued to 104 gramasevaka divisions and by overlaying weightage the areas for the co-ordination of agricultural, settlement and environmental priorities have been ascertained. By overlaying these priority maps, conflicting land uses have been identified. Conflicts arise particularly in areas where land uses do not suitably tally with the physical environment and also due to the unplanned land use activities undertaken by the peasants. Thus, it has been possible to identify the conflicts in land use through the study of land use priorities. This study has thus helped to identify land use priorities and conflicts, and it is hoped that it will serve as a guide for further studies undertaken in the river basins of Northern Sri Lanka as well as in other river basins in the future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anderson, J. R. (2001). A land use and Cover classification system for use with remote sensor data. US Government Printing office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cour, J. G., Kadigi, R. M., Lankford, B. A., Yawson, D. K., & Tumbo, S. (2008). A decision—Aid for the Management of water resources in the Ruaha river Basin, Tanzania (pp. 01–11). www.iwmi.org.

  • Kopacz, M., & Twardy, S. (2011). The land use changes in agricultural areas between 1980 and 2005 with particular emphasis on permanent grasslands—an example of the upper Raba River basin. Joural of Water and Land Development, 15, 19–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambin, E. F., & Ehrlich, D. (1997). Land-Cover change in sub-Saharan Africa (1982–1991): Application of change index based on remately sensed surface temperature and vegetation indices at continental scale. Remote sensing and Environment, 61, 181–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nain, Y. Y., Li, X., Zhou, J., & Hu, X. L. (2014). Impact of land use change on water resource allocation in the middle reaches of the Heihe River Basin in Northwestern China. Journal of Arid Land, 6(3), 273–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadeghi, S. H. R., Jalili, K., & Nikkami, D. (2009) Land use optimization in watersed scale. Land Use Policy, 26, 186–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sante-Riveira, I., Crecente-Maseda, R., & Miranda-Borros, D. (2008). GIS-based planning support system for rural land-use allocation. Computers and Electronic in Agriculture, 63, 257–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty, L. S., & Vargas, G. (1991). Prediction, projection and forecasting (251p). Kluwer Academic Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thu, P. M. (2012). Access to land and livelihoods in past-confilict timor-leste. Australian Geographer, 43(2), 197–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Unruh, J. D. (2008). Toward sustainable livelihood after war: Reconstituting rural land tenure systems. Natural Resources forum 32, 103–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yashon, O., Ouma, Y. O., & Tateishi, R. (2014). Urban flood vulnerability and risk mapping using integrated multi parametric AHP and GIS: Methodological overview and case study assessment. Water, 1515–1545.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Subajini Uthayarasa .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Uthayarasa, S. (2023). Methodology of Land Use Priorities and Conflicts Study. In: Mustafa, F.B. (eds) Methodological Approaches in Integrated Geography. Springer Texts in Social Sciences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-28784-8_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-28784-8_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-28783-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-28784-8

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics