Skip to main content

Climate Change, Soil Saturation, and Risk of Yield Penalties to Key Cereal Crops: A Neglected Issue in Agri-Food System Adaptation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Climate Change Strategies: Handling the Challenges of Adapting to a Changing Climate

Part of the book series: Climate Change Management ((CCM))

Abstract

Soil water or moisture balance drives essential rhizospheric and physiological processes that culminate in yield formation in crop plants. Climate change threatens to alter temperature and precipitation patterns and thereby the hydrological processes underpinning soil moisture balance and related stresses such as saturation or deficit. While considerable volume of literature exists on soil moisture deficits under the climate change, the same cannot be said of soil saturation (the transitory water content of the soil when nearly all its pore spaces are filled with water and the water potential is close to zero). Few crop plants can survive soil saturation exceeding few days. This chapter demonstrates the potential effects of soil saturation on crop yield penalties under projected climate change. Cereals are the main dietary energy source in human diets and animal feed formulations. Hence, future yield penalties in cereals can be detrimental to global food security. Cereals can be highly sensitive to abiotic stresses such as heat stress and soil water deficit or saturation at specific growth stages. The FAO AquaCrop model was used to simulate biomass production and yield of the barley genotype Westminster for all UK administrative regions in the 2050s. The simulation was done for spring conditions, under the low and high climate change emission scenarios (LES and HES), respectively. Yield penalty was expressed as the mean percentage of all yearly yield reductions in the 30-year time slice relative to the 10th percentile yield for the entire time slice. The results showed that yield penalties were more extensive under the HES than the LES. The ranges of yield penalties were 5–76% (HES) and 5–41% (LES) under varied durations and severities of soil saturation. It is concluded that, due to climate change, soil saturation can potentially cause substantial yield penalties, especially in highly sensitive crops and is, therefore, worthy of research, policy and practical attention. Although soil saturation stresses could be less frequent compared to those of heat and soil moisture deficits, yield penalties under the former could, in some cases, be larger than the latter and could occur as a surprise. It is recommended that further studies on potential effects of soil saturation on crop yield penalties be integrated in the suite of research and measures for adaptation of key crops such as cereals, which are the main source of energy in human diets and animal feed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anjum SA, Xie X, Wang LC, Saleem MF (2011) Morphological, physiological, and biochemical responses of plants to drought stress. Afr J Agric Res 6(9):2026–2032

    Google Scholar 

  • Baruth B, Genovese G, Montanarella L (2006) New soil information for the MARS Crop Yield Forecasting System. European Commission Directorate General, Joint Research Centre, Ispra, Italy

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnabás B, Jäger K, Fehér A (2008) The effect of drought and heat stress on reproductive processes in cereals. Plant, Cell Environ 31(1):11–38

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya A (2021) Effect of soil water deficit on growth and development of plants: a review. In: Soil water deficit and physiological issues in plants. Springer, Singapore, pp 393–488. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-6276-5_5

  • Clarke GRT, Hughes DAB, Barbour SL, Sivakumar V (2006) The implications of predicted climate changes on the stability of highway geotechnical infrastructure: a case study of field monitoring of pore water response. EIC Climate Change Technology, 1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Daba MH, Bazi Z, Belay A (2018) Effects of climate change on soil and water resources: a review. J Environ Earth Sci 8(7):71–80

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2018) The impact of disasters and crises on agriculture and food security. http://www.fao.org/emergencies/resources/documents/resources-detail/en/c/1106859/

  • Gebre MG, Earl HJ (2021) Soil water deficit and fertilizer placement effects on root biomass distribution, soil water extraction, water use, yield, and yield components of soybean (Glycine max (L)) grown in 1-m rooting columns. Front Plant Sci 12:581127. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.581127

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Geerts S, Raes D, Gracia M, Miranda R, Cusicanqui JA, Taboada C, Mendoza J, Huanca R, Mamani A, Condori O, Mamani J, Morales B, Osco V, Steduto P (2009) Simulating yield response of Quinoa to water availability with AquaCrop. Agron J 101:499–508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • González A, Ayerbe L (2011) Response of coleoptiles to water deficit: growth, turgor maintenance and osmotic adjustment in barley plants (Hordeum vulgare L.). Agric Sci 2(3):159–166

    Google Scholar 

  • González A, Martin I, Ayerbe L (1999) Barley yield in water-stress conditions: the influence of precocity, osmotic adjustment and stomatal conductance. Field Crop Res 62(1):23–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han M, Zhang H, Chavez JL, Ma L, Trout TJ, DeJonge KC (2018) Improved soil water deficit estimation through the integration of canopy temperature measurement into a soil water balance model. Irrig Sci 36:187–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2021) Summary for policymakers In: Masson-Delmotte V, Zhai P, Pirani A, Connors SL, Péan C, Berger S, Caud N, Chen Y, Goldfar BL, Gomis MI, Huang M, Leitzell K, Lonnoy E, Matthews JBR, Maycock TK, Waterfield T, Yelekçi O, Yu R, Zhou B (eds) Climate change (2021): the physical science basis contribution of the working group I to the sixth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change (In press)

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2018) Global warming of 15°C an IPCC special report on the impacts of global warming of 15°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change sustainable development and efforts to eradicate poverty. In: Masson-Delmotte VP, Zhai H-O, Pörtner D, Roberts J, Skea PR, Shukla A, Pirani W, Moufouma-Okia C, Péan Pidcock S, Connors JBR, Matthews Y, Chen X, Zhou MI, Gomis E, Lonnoy T, Maycock M, Tignor, Waterfield T (eds) (In press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins GJ, Perry MC, Prior MJ (2008) The climate of the United Kingdom and recent trends. Met Office Hadley Centre Exeter, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones PD, Kilsby CG, Harpham C, Glenis V, Burton A (2009) UK climate projections science report: projections of future daily climate for the UK from the weather generator. University of Newcastle, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Lal R, Shukla MK (2004) Principles of soil physics. Marcel Dekker, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lambers H, Chapin III FS, Pons TL (2008) Plant physiological ecology (2nd edn) Springer, New York, pp 16–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee EM, Jones DKC (2004) Landslide risk assessment. Thomas Telford, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch J, Marschner P, Rengel Z (2012) Effect of internal and external factors on root growth and development. In: Marschner’s mineral nutrition of higher plants. Academic Press, London, pp 331–346

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy JM, Sexton DMH, Jenkins GJ et al. (2009) UK climate projections science report: climate change projections. Met Office Hadley Centre, Exeter

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakićenović N, Swart R (Eds) (2000) Special report on emissions scenarios: A special report of working group III of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann G, Römheld V (2012) Rhizosphere chemistry in relation to plant nutrition. In: Marschner’s mineral nutrition of higher plants. Academic Press, London, pp 347–368

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton AC., Flavell AJ, George TS et al. (2011) Crops that feed the world 4. Barley: a resilient crop? Strengths and weaknesses in the context of food security. Food Secur 3(2):141–178

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinheiro C, Chaves MM (2011) Photosynthesis and drought: can we make metabolic connections from available data? Journal of Experimental Botany 62(3):869–882. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erq340

  • Raes D, Steduto P, Hsiao TC, Fereres E (2009) AquaCrop—the FAO crop model to simulate yield response to water: II. Main algorithms and software description. Agron J 101:438–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rajala A, Hakala K, Mäkelä P, Peltonen-Sainio P (2011) Drought effect on grain number and grain weight at spike and spikelet level in six-row spring barley. J. Agron. Crop Sci 197(2):103–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson JD, Vahedifard F (2016) Weakening mechanisms imposed on California’s levees under multiyear extreme drought. Climatic Chang 137(1–2):1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Semenov MA, Shewry PR (2011) Modelling predicts that heat stress, not drought, will increase vulnerability of wheat in Europe. Sci Rep 1(66):5. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep00066

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shone MGT, Flood AV (1983) Effects of periods of localized water stress on subsequent nutrient uptake by barley roots and their adaptation by osmotic adjustment. New Phytol 94(4):561–572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vardon PJ (2015) Climatic influence on geotechnical infrastructure: a review. Environ Geotech 2(3):166–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Yang J, Chen Y, Fang G, Duan W, Li Y, De Meyer P (2019) Quantifying the effects of climate and vegetation on soil moisture in an arid area. China. Water 11:767. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11040767

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yawson DO, Ball T, Adu MO, Mohan S, Mulholland BJ, White PJ (2016) Simulated regional yields of spring barley in the United Kingdom under projected climate change. Climate 2016(4):54. https://doi.org/10.3390/cli4040054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yawson DO (2013) Climate change and virtual water: implications for UK food security, PhD thesis. University of Dundee, Dundee, UK. https://discovery.dundee.ac.uk/en/studentTheses/climate-change-and-virtualwater.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Oscar Yawson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Yawson, D.O., Adu, M.O. (2023). Climate Change, Soil Saturation, and Risk of Yield Penalties to Key Cereal Crops: A Neglected Issue in Agri-Food System Adaptation. In: Leal Filho, W., Kovaleva, M., Alves, F., Abubakar, I.R. (eds) Climate Change Strategies: Handling the Challenges of Adapting to a Changing Climate. Climate Change Management. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-28728-2_27

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics