Skip to main content

How Did It Go? Building Knowledge Together with the Help of Facilitative Actions

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Pedagogical Innovation for Children's Agency in the Classroom

Abstract

This chapter includes illustrative excerpts, transcribed from the video recording of real interactions during project-based approach workshops to illustrate how each category of facilitative action supported children’s agency. The selection of excerpts was not motivated by an intention to represent everything that happened during the project-based approach workshops. Rather, the excerpts were chosen to exemplify all the ways in which, in the corpora of data produced, each type of facilitative action supported children’s participation in the interactions as authors of knowledge.

Authorship of narrative was understood as a form of agency because it is based on children’s autonomous choices to share stories, to comment on others’ stories, or to interlace new stories with an ongoing one. The observation of facilitation was founded on the idea of talk as context-shaped but also context-renewing. Each action-in-interaction relates to a local context made by previous actions (context-shaped); it also contributes to shape the local context for the next action (context-renewing). The idea of talk as context-shaped but also context-renewing made it possible to evaluate how facilitative actions shaped talk-in-interaction, making it a favourable local context for children’s access to the agentic status of authors of knowledge.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Baraldi, C., & Farini, F. (2013). Trust and facilitation. In H. Warming (Ed.), Participation, citizenship and trust in children’s lives (pp. 132–153). London: Palgrave MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baraldi, C., Farini, F., & M. Ślusarczyk (2022) Facilitative practices to promote migrant children’s agency and hybrid integration in schools: Discussing data from Italy, Poland and England. Language and Intercultural Communication. https://doi.org/10.1080/14708477.2022.2096054.

  • Baraldi, C., Joslyn, E., & Farini, F. (Eds.). (2021). Promoting Children’s Rights in European Schools. Intercultural Dialogue and Facilitative Pedagogy. Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caffi, C. (2004). La mitigazione: Un approccio pragmatica alla communicazione nei contesti terapeutici. LIT Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farini, F. (2011). Cultures of education in action: Research on the relationship between interaction and cultural presuppositions regarding education in an international educational setting. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(8), 2176–2186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farini, F. (2019a). From the child to the pupil to the child. Trust based on categorical inequalities and the quest for alternatives towards a more inclusive education. Italian Journal of Sociology of Education, 11(3), 246–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farini, F. (2019b). As a conclusion, to the future: A discussion on trust, agency and the semantics of rights in intergenerational relationships. In F. Farini & A. Scollan (Eds.), Children’s Self-determination in the context of early childhood education and services: Discourses, policies and practices (pp. 267–280). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Farini, F., & Scollan, A. (2021a). From enabling environments to environments that enable: Notes for theoretical innovation at the intersection between environments, learning and children’s agency. An Leanbh Óg: The OMEP Ireland Journal of Early Childhood Studies, 14, 20–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farini, F., & Scollan, A. (2021b). Meanings and methods of pedagogical innovation. In F. Farini, C. Baraldi, & E. Joslyn (Eds.), Promoting children’s rights in European schools. Intercultural dialogue and facilitative pedagogy. Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farini, F, Baraldi, C., & Scollan, A. (2023). This is my truth, tell me yours. Positioning children as authors of knowledge through facilitation of narratives in dialogic interactions. Practice, 4–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/25783858.2023.2177185

  • Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity. Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayashi, M. (2012). Turn allocation and turn sharing. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 167–190). John Wiley and Sons.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Heritage, J. (1984). A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 299–345). Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitchen, W. H. (2014). Authority and the teacher. Bloomsbury Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margutti, P. (2006). “Are you human beings?” Order and knowledge construction through questioning in primary classroom interaction. Linguistics and Education, 17(4), 313–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehan, H. (1979). Learning lessons: Social organization in the classroom. Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Raymond, G. (2003). The structure of responding: Conforming and nonconforming responses to yes/no type interrogatives. American Sociological Review, 68(6), 939–967.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schegloff, E. A. (2012). Sequence organization in interaction. A primer in conversation analysis. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seuren, L. M., & Huiskes, M. (2017). Confirmation or elaboration: What do yes/no declaratives want? Research on Language and Social Interaction, 50(2), 188–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stivers, T., Enfield, N. J., Brown, P., Englert, C., Hayashi, M., Heinemann, T., Hoymann, G., Rossano, F., & de Ruiter, J. P. (2009). Universals and cultural variation in turn-taking in conversation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(26), 10587–10592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, X. (2014). A cognitive pragmatic study of rhetorical questions. English Language and Literature Studies, 4(1), 42–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Federico Farini .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Farini, F., Scollan, A. (2023). How Did It Go? Building Knowledge Together with the Help of Facilitative Actions. In: Pedagogical Innovation for Children's Agency in the Classroom. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-28501-1_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-28501-1_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-28500-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-28501-1

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics