Skip to main content

Social and Electoral Determinants

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Polish Delegation in the European Parliament

Abstract

Held since 1979, general elections to the European Parliament (EP) have been a subject of research interest for political scientists as well as sociologists. Voter turnout, the political orientation of candidates, electoral campaigns, the behaviour of the electorate and the relation of EP elections to elections at the national level are topics frequently addressed by various researchers (Berezin & Diez-Medrano, 2008; Eichenberg & Dalton, 2007; Gabel & Anderson, 2002; Lodge, 2005; Niedermayer & Sinnot, 1998; Rittberger, 2005). This chapter will focus on the area of research related to the social (and simultaneously cultural) and electoral determinants of EP elections in Poland. This means that the phenomenon of these elections will be analysed against the background of broader socio-economic and cultural processes taking place in Poland during the first two decades of the twenty-first century. It is assumed that these processes are not events in their own right, but constitute integral elements of a sequence of political events (similarly to other categories of elections), socio-economic events (such as the reactions of citizens to various economic or social phenomena) and, finally, cultural events (e.g. declared or fostered values of a particular society).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    ESS is a broad research project based on the methodology of survey research carried out in most European countries since 1981, using a standardized survey questionnaire containing a series of questions relating to citizens’ key attitudes, opinions and values (EES, Data Portal).

  2. 2.

    Using chain indices, the rate of change can be calculated by dividing the value of a given period by the value of the previous period and then, to calculate the rate of change, by multiplying all the values and obtaining the fifth root of the product. In the next step, one is subtracted from the obtained result and the final result of the difference should be given in the form of a percentage. If the result is close to 0, it means that the individual values in the periods under examination differed little from each other, which allows for the conclusion the a given index is relatively consistent. Negative values show us the medium-term rate of decline, that is, how much the values fall on average over the period studied.

  3. 3.

    The data in Figure 2.1 concerning support for the EU among Poles and the data in Table 2.1 concerning trust in the EP.

References

  • Babbie, E. (2001). The Practice of Social Science. Wadsworth/Thompson Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker, C. (2003). Cultural Studies. Theory and Practice. SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berezin, M., & Diez-Medrano, J. (2008). Distance Matters: Place, Political Legitimacy and Popular Support for European Integration. Comparative European Politics, 6(2), 1–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binzer Hobolt, S., & Wittrock, J. (2011). The Second-Order Election Model Revisited: An Experimental Test of Vote Choices in European Parliament Elections. Electoral Studies, 30(1), 29–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birch S., & Lodge G. (2015). Voter Engagement, Electoral Inequality and First Time Compulsory Voting. “Political Quarterly”, 86(3), pp 385–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bodnár, J. (2001). On, Urban and Social. Critical. Perspectives on Urban Redevelopment, 6, 173–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CBOS. (2020). Postrzeganie Unii Europejskiej i jej instytucji. Komunikat z badań. No. 32/2020.

    Google Scholar 

  • Czerniak, A., & Baluth, J. (2010). Co przyniosły inwestycje zagraniczne. Wpływ na gospodarkę Polski w ostatnim ćwierćwieczu. Polityka Insight.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eichenberg, R. C., & Dalton, R. J. (2007). Post-Maastricht Blues: The Transformation of Citizens Support for European Integration. Acta Politica, 42(2-3), 128–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gabel, M. J., & Anderson, C. J. (2002). The Structure of Citizen Attitudes and the European Political Space. Comparative Political Studies, 35(8), 893–913.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1998). Socjologia. Wydawnictwo Zysk i S-ka.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grabowska-Lusińska, I., & Okólski, M. (2008). Migracje z Polski po 1 maja 2004 roku: jej intensywność i kierunki geograficzne oraz alokacja migrantów na rynkach pracy krajów Unii Europejskiej. Seria Prace Migracyjne no. 33/91. Centrum Badań nad Migracjami.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keating, M., Loughlin, J., & Deschouwer, K. (2003). Culture, Institutions and Economic Development. A Study of Eight Europeans Regions. Edward Elgar.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McLaren, L. (2006). Identity, Interest and Attitudes to European Integration. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Moro, G. (2012). Citizens in Europe. Civic Activism and the Community Democratic Experiment. Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Niedermayer, O., & Sinnot, R. (Eds.). (1998). Public Opinion and Internationalized Governance. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Philips Davison, W. (1968). Public Opinion. Introduction. In D. L. Sills (Ed.), International Encyclopedia of Social Sciences (Vol. 13). The Macmillan Company and the Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reif, K., & Schmitt, H. (1980). Nine Second-Order National Elections—A Conceptual Framework for the Analysis of European Elections Results. European Journal of Political Research, 8(1), 3–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rittberger, B. (2005). Building Europe’s Parliament. Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitter, P. (2000). How to Democratize the European Union ... And Why Bother. Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wojciechowski, L., & Lubacha-Sember, J. (2014). Uwarunkowania przepływu polskich bezpośrednich inwestycji zagranicznych do krajów Unii Europejskiej: model grawitacyjny z wykorzystaniem danych panelowych. Ekonomia Międzynarodowa, 7, 136–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zagała, Z. (2021). Narracje o polityce w podzielonym społeczeństwie—na przykładzie wyborców Platformy Obywatelskiej i Prawa i Sprawiedliwości. Uniwersytet Śląski.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert Geisler .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Geisler, R. (2023). Social and Electoral Determinants. In: Zuba, K. (eds) The Polish Delegation in the European Parliament. Central and Eastern European Perspectives on International Relations. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-28271-3_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics