Abstract
In future worlds, robots will participate and collaborate in human activities, and deeply interact with humans through personal, intimate and immediate actions around and even on the human body. Taking feminine rituals of grooming the body and highlighting body attributes as a focus, we investigate the intersection of biological and machine moving bodies, exploring vulnerable moments of touch. Introducing a robot into an entrenched cultural act that references the universal female is a disruptive, critical tactic for rethinking dominant approaches to human–robot collaboration. Through a Deleuzian analysis of our video artwork code_red (2021), we propose an alternative theoretical interpretation of the interaction between an industrial robotic arm and a female figure. We then turn to a broader consideration of how this particular analysis ties back into current thinking in collaborative, industrial and social robotics, through a discussion of concepts of breaching the intimate zone, resonance, and micro-gestures in human–robot relations.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Code_red video viewable at https://vimeo.com/636034376.
- 2.
Francis Bacon, Three Studies of Lucian Freud (1969), https://www.francisbacon.com/artworks/paintings/three-studies-lucian-freud.
- 3.
Francis Bacon, Study for Bullfight No. 1 (1969), https://www.francisbacon.com/artworks/paintings/study-bullfight-no-1.
- 4.
Francis Bacon, Three Studies of Figures on Beds (1972), https://www.francisbacon.com/artworks/paintings/three-studies-figures-beds.
- 5.
Francis Bacon, Three Studies of Henrietta Moraes (1969), https://www.francisbacon.com/artworks/paintings/three-studies-henrietta-moraes-1.
- 6.
- 7.
References
Burgoon JK (2018) Microexpressions are not the best way to catch a liar. Front Psychol 9:1672. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01672
Čapek K (1920) R. U. R.: Rossum’s universal robots. Aventinum
Chartier G, Berthoz A, Brian E, Jaisson M (2017) Violence and uncertainty: interactional sketches for a cognitive analysis of violent actions. Soc Sci Inf 56(2):198–219. https://doi.org/10.1177/0539018417694772
Chen H, Liu X, Li X, Shi H, Zhao G (2019) Analyze spontaneous gestures for emotional stress state recognition: a micro-gesture dataset and analysis with deep learning. In: 2019 14th IEEE international conference on automatic face gesture recognition (FG 2019), pp 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/FG.2019.8756513
Colgate J, Wannasuphoprasit W, Peshkin M (1996) Cobots: robots for collaboration with human operators. In: Proceedings of the 1996 ASME international mechanical engineering congress and exposition; conference. pp 433–439, 17–22 Nov
Deleuze G (1981/2003) Francis Bacon: the logic of sensation. Continuum
Despret V (2013) Responding bodies and partial affinities in human–animal worlds. Theory Cult Soc 30(7–8):51–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276413496852
Ekman P, Friesen WV (1969) Nonverbal leakage and clues to deception. Psychiatry 32:85–105
Foster S (2010) Choreographing empathy: Kinesthesia in performance. Routledge, London. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203840702
Gallese V, Fadiga L, Fogassi L, Rizzolatti G (1996) Action recognition in the premotor cortex. Brain 119:593–609
Gemeinboeck P (2017) Creative robotics: Rethinking human machine configurations introduction (editorial). Fibreculture J 28:1–7. https://doi.org/10.15307/fcj.28.203.2017
Gemeinboeck P (2021) The aesthetics of encounter: a relational-performative design approach to human-robot interaction. Front Robot AI 7:217. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2020.577900
Granjon P (2017) This machine could bite: On the role of non-benign art robots. Fibreculture J 28. https://doi.org/10.15307/fcj.28.208.2017
Haggard E, Isaacs K (1966) Micro-momentary facial expressions as indicators of ego mechanisms in psychotherapy. Appleton-Century-Crofts, pp 154–165
Kerruish E (2017) Affective touch in social robots. Transformations J 116–135
Martinetti A, Chemweno PK, Nizamis K, Fosch-Villaronga E (2021) Redefining safety in light of human-robot interaction: a critical review of current standards and regulations. Front Chem Eng 3:32. https://doi.org/10.3389/fceng.2021.666237
Miyoshi K (2019) What allows us to kinesthetically empathize with motions of non-anthropomorphic objects? 4:52. https://doi.org/10.5278/ojs.jos.v4i2.2447
Saerbeck M, Bartneck C (2010) Perception of affect elicited by robot motion. In: Proceedings of the 5th ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction, HRI ’10. IEEE Press, pp 53–60
Sheets-Johnstone M (1999) The primacy of movement. John Benjamins Publishing Company
Venture G, Kulić D (2019) Robot expressive motions: a survey of generation and evaluation methods. J Hum -Robot Interact 8(4). https://doi.org/10.1145/3344286
Acknowledgements
We are grateful for the contributions and collaborations to produce the code_red film and project by Paul Warren (cinematography, videography), Lindsay Webb (sound design), Susana Alarcon (model and DMAF technician), Lynn Masuda (robot programmer), and the support of DMAF, Sydney School of Architecture, Design and Planning, University of Sydney.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Loke, L., Reinhardt, D. (2023). Rouge and Robot: The Disruptive Feminine. In: Dunstan, B.J., Koh, J.T.K.V., Turnbull Tillman, D., Brown, S.A. (eds) Cultural Robotics: Social Robots and Their Emergent Cultural Ecologies. Springer Series on Cultural Computing. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-28138-9_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-28138-9_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-28137-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-28138-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)