Skip to main content

Medication Reconciliation and Review: Theory, Practice and Evidence

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Optimizing Pharmacotherapy in Older Patients

Part of the book series: Practical Issues in Geriatrics ((PIG))

  • 567 Accesses

Abstract

Medication-related problems, including medication error and inappropriate prescribing, are commonly experienced by older people and increase their risk of experiencing medication-related harm, hospitalisation or death. The risk of these hazards is greater at points of care transition than other stages of care. Medication reconciliation and medication review are component processes within a wider medication assessment strategy that seeks to enhance the benefit that patients derive from medication use. This chapter describes the theoretical basis, supporting evidence and practical application of these processes and the interaction between them to optimise medication use.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Alqenae FA, Steinke D, Keers RN. Prevalence and nature of medication errors and medication-related harm following discharge from hospital to community settings: a systematic review. Drug Saf. 2020;43(6):517–37.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Oscanoa T, Lizaraso F, Carvajal A. Hospital admissions due to adverse drug reactions in the elderly. A meta-analysis. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2017;73(6):759–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Medicines optimisation: the safe and effective use of medicines to enable the best possible outcomes. NICE Guideline 5. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng5. Accessed 27 Feb 2022.

  4. Penm J, Vaillancourt R, Pouliot A. Defining and identifying concepts of medication reconciliation: an international pharmacy perspective. Res Soc Adm Pharm. 2019;15(6):632–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2018.07.020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Institute for Safe Medication Practices Canada. Medication reconciliation in acute care: getting started kit. Canada: Institute for Safe Medication Practices; 2011. https://www.ismp-canada.org/download/MedRec/Medrec_AC_English_GSK_V3.pdf. Accessed 27 Feb 2022

  6. Anderson LJ, Schnipper JL, Nuckols TK, Shane R, Le MM, Robbins K, et al. Effect of medication reconciliation interventions on outcomes: a systematic overview of systematic reviews. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2019;76(24):2028–40. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajhp/zxz236.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Guisado-Gil AB, Mejías-Trueba M, Alfaro-Lara ER, Sánchez-Hidalgo M, Ramírez-Duque N, Santos-Rubio MD. Impact of medication reconciliation on health outcomes: an overview of systematic reviews. Res Soc Adm Pharm. 2020;16(8):995–1002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.10.011.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Killin L, Hezam A, Anderson KK, Welk B. Advanced medication reconciliation: a systematic review of the impact on medication errors and adverse drug events associated with transitions of care. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2021;47(7):438–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjq.2021.03.011.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. McNab D, Bowie P, Ross A, MacWalter G, Ryan M, Morrison J. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness of pharmacist-led medication reconciliation in the community after hospital discharge. BMJ Qual Saf. 2018;27(4):308–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mekonnen AB, Abebe TB, McLachlan AJ, Brien JA. Impact of electronic medication reconciliation interventions on medication discrepancies at hospital transitions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Med Inf Decis Mak. 2016;16:112. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-016-0353-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Redmond P, Grimes TC, McDonnell R, Boland F, Hughes C, Fahey T. Impact of medication reconciliation for improving transitions of care. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;8:CD010791. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD010791.pub2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Tomlinson J, Cheong VL, Fylan B, Silcock J, Smith H, Karban K, et al. Successful care transitions for older people: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of interventions that support medication continuity. Age Ageing. 2020;49(4):558–69. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afaa002.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Manias E, Bucknall T, Hughes C, Jorm C, Woodward-Kron R. Family involvement in managing medications of older patients across transitions of care: a systematic review. BMC Geriatr. 2019;19(1):95. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-019-1102-6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Hias J, Van der Linden L, Spriet I, Vanbrabant P, Willems L, Tournoy J, et al. Predictors for unintentional medication reconciliation discrepancies in preadmission medication: a systematic review. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2017;73(11):1355–77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Waldron C, Cahill J, Cromie S, Delaney T, Kennelly SP, Pevnick JM, et al. Personal Electronic Records of Medications (PERMs) for medication reconciliation at care transitions: a rapid realist review. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021;21(1):1–17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-021-01659-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Griese-Mammen N, Hersberger KE, Messerli M, Leikola S, Horvat N, van Mil J, et al. PCNE definition of medication review: reaching agreement. Int J Clin Pharm. 2018;40(5):1199–208.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lewis T. A systematic approach to polypharmacy review. BMJ. 2019;364:1034.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. National Health Service Scotland. The 7-steps medication review. In: Polypharmacy: manage medicines. National Health Service Scotland,, Scotland. 2022. https://managemeds.scot.nhs.uk/for-healthcare-professionals/principles/the-7-steps-medication-review/. Accessed 27 Feb 2022.

  19. Pharmaceutical Care Network Europe. PCNE classification for drug-related problems V9.1. Zuidlaren: Pharmaceutical Care Network Europe; 2020. https://www.pcne.org/upload/files/417_PCNE_classification_V9-1_final.pdf. Accessed 27 Feb 2022

  20. Christensen M, Lundh A. Medication review in hospitalised patients to reduce morbidity and mortality. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;2:CD008986. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008986.pub3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hasan Ibrahim AS, Barry HE, Hughes CM. A systematic review of general practice-based pharmacists’ services to optimize medicines management in older people with multimorbidity and polypharmacy. Fam Pract. 2021;38(4):509–23. https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmaa146.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Jokanovic N, Tan EC, Sudhakaran S, Kirkpatrick CM, Dooley MJ, Ryan-Atwood TE, et al. Pharmacist-led medication review in community settings: an overview of systematic reviews. Res Soc Adm Pharm. 2017;13(4):661–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kallio SE, Kiiski A, Airaksinen MS, Mäntylä AT, Kumpusalo-Vauhkonen AE, Järvensivu TP, et al. Community pharmacists’ contribution to medication reviews for older adults: a systematic review. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018;66(8):1613–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ming Y, Zecevic AA, Hunter SW, Miao W, Tirona RG. Medication review in preventing older adults’ fall-related injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Can Geriatr J. 2021;24(3):237–50. https://doi.org/10.5770/cgj.24.478.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Thiruchelvam K, Hasan SS, Wong PS, Kairuz T. Residential aged care medication review to improve the quality of medication use: a systematic review. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2017;18(1):87.e1–e14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2016.10.004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Abrahamsen B, Hansen RN, Rossing C. For which patient subgroups are there positive outcomes from a medication review? A systematic review. Pharm Pract (Granada). 2020;18(4):1976. https://doi.org/10.18549/pharmpract.2020.4.1976.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kempen TG, Hedström M, Olsson H, Johansson A, Ottosson S, Al-Sammak Y, et al. Assessment tool for hospital admissions related to medications: development and validation in older patients. Int J Clin Pharm. 2019;41(1):198–206.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Thevelin S, Spinewine A, Beuscart JB, Boland B, Marien S, Vaillant F, et al. Development of a standardized chart review method to identify drug-related hospital admissions in older people. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2018;84(11):2600–14.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tamasine Grimes .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Grimes, T., Ryan, C. (2023). Medication Reconciliation and Review: Theory, Practice and Evidence. In: Cherubini, A., Mangoni, A.A., O’Mahony, D., Petrovic, M. (eds) Optimizing Pharmacotherapy in Older Patients. Practical Issues in Geriatrics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-28061-0_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-28061-0_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-28060-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-28061-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics