Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Medicolegal Issues in Skull Base Reconstruction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Skull Base Reconstruction

  • 253 Accesses

Abstract

Medicolegal issues have become an increasing concern for physicians, thereby adding to healthcare costs. A review of malpractice claims pertaining to skull base reconstruction could be used to minimize the risk of future litigation and improve patient care. This chapter explores (1) components of adequate information that should be discussed during informed consent of skull base reconstruction surgeries, (2) a literature review of prior malpractice cases, and (3) tips to minimize malpractice risks. Skull base reconstruction surgeries carry significant malpractice risks due to the complex anatomy and potential major complications. Even experienced surgeons would benefit from understanding the common errors made by others to prevent complications and avoid litigation. Proper evaluation, meticulous techniques in surgery, and honest and open communication with patients remain paramount for minimizing litigation risks and, more importantly, for providing optimal patient care.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Naik AN, Lancione PJ, Parikh AS, et al. Anterior skull base reconstruction: a contemporary. 2021.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Moyer JS, Chepeha DB, Teknos TN. Contemporary skull base reconstruction. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004;12(4):294–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ein L, Sargi Z, Nicolli EA. Update on anterior skull base reconstruction. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019;27(5):426–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ferreres AR. Surgical ethics: principles and practice. Cham: Springer; 2019.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Spatz ES, Krumholz HM, Moulton BW. The new era of informed consent: getting to a reasonable-patient standard through shared decision making. JAMA. 2016;315(19):2063–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Gil Z, Abergel A, Spektor S, et al. Quality of life following surgery for anterior skull base tumors. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003;129(12):1303–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gil Z, Abergel A, Spektor S, Khafif A, Fliss DM. Patient, caregiver, and surgeon perceptions of quality of life following anterior skull base surgery. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004;130(11):1276–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fliss DM, Abergel A, Cavel O, Margalit N, Gil Z. Combined subcranial approaches for excision of complex anterior skull base tumors. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007;133(9):888–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lim X, Rajagopal R, Silva P, Jeyaretna DS, Mykula R, Potter M. A systematic review on outcomes of anterior skull base reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2020;73(11):1940–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Harvey RJ, Parmar P, Sacks R, Zanation AM. Endoscopic skull base reconstruction of large dural defects: a systematic review of published evidence. Laryngoscope. 2012;122(2):452–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Thompson NJ, Roche JP, Schularick NM, Chang KE, Hansen MR. Reconstruction outcomes following lateral skull base resection. Otol Neurotol. 2017;38(2):264–71.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Howard BE, Nagel TH, Barrs DM, Donald CB, Hayden RE. Reconstruction of lateral skull base defects: a comparison of the submental flap to free and regional flaps. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016;154(6):1014–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kane L. Medscape malpractice report 2019. 2019. https://www.medscape.com/slideshow/2019-malpractice-report-6012303. Accessed 20 May 2021.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ceremsak J, Miller LE, Gomez ED. A review of otolaryngology malpractice cases with associated court proceedings from 2010 to 2019. Laryngoscope. 2021;131(4):E1081–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bal BS. An introduction to medical malpractice in the United States. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467(2):339–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Patel AM, Still TE, Vaughan W. Medicolegal issues in endoscopic sinus surgery. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2010;43(4):905–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sioshansi PC, Chen T, Babu SC. Malpractice in skull base surgery. In: Anderson EJ, et al., editors. Litigation in otolaryngology: minimizing liability and preventing adverse outcomes. Cham: Springer; 2021. p. 87.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Blake DM, Svider PF, Carniol ET, Mauro AC, Eloy JA, Jyung RW. Malpractice in otology. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013;149(4):554–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Svider PF, Husain Q, Kovalerchik O, et al. Determining legal responsibility in otolaryngology: a review of 44 trials since 2008. Am J Otolaryngol. 2013;34(6):699–705.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lydiatt DD. Medical malpractice and facial nerve paralysis. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003;129(1):50–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lydiatt DD, Sewell RK. Medical malpractice and sinonasal disease. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008;139(5):677–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Dawson DE, Kraus EM. Medical malpractice and rhinology. Am J Rhinol. 2007;21(5):584–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kovalerchik O, Mady LJ, Svider PF, et al. Physician accountability in iatrogenic cerebrospinal fluid leak litigation. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2013;3(9):722–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Birkenbeuel J, Vu K, Lehrich BM, et al. Medical malpractice of vestibular schwannoma: a 40-year review of the United States legal databases. Otol Neurotol. 2019;40(3):391–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Studdert DM, Mello MM, Sage WM, et al. Defensive medicine among high-risk specialist physicians in a volatile malpractice environment. JAMA. 2005;293(21):2609–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Seabury SA, Chandra A, Lakdawalla DN, Jena AB. On average, physicians spend nearly 11 percent of their 40-year careers with an open, unresolved malpractice claim. Health Aff. 2013;32(1):111–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kern KA. Preventing the delayed diagnosis of breast cancer through medical litigation analysis. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 1994;3(1):101–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Diercks DB, Cady B. Lawsuits for failure to diagnose breast cancer: tumor biology in causation and risk management strategies. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 1994;3(1):125–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Levinson W. Physician-patient communication: a key to malpractice prevention. JAMA. 1994;272(20):1619–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Levinson W, Roter DL, Mullooly JP, Dull VT, Frankel RM. Physician-patient communication: the relationship with malpractice claims among primary care physicians and surgeons. JAMA. 1997;277(7):553–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Huntington B, Kuhn N. Communication gaffes: a root cause of malpractice claims. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2003;16(2):157–61; discussion 161.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Svider PF, Kelly SP, Baredes S, Eloy JA. Overview of malpractice litigation in otolaryngology. In: Anderson EJ, et al., editors. Litigation in otolaryngology: minimizing liability and preventing adverse outcomes. Cham: Springer; 2021. p. 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Klimo GF, Daum WJ, Brinker MR, McGuire E, Elliott MN. Orthopedic medical malpractice: an attorney’s perspective. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2000;29(2):93–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Ramakrishnan VR, Orlandi RR, Citardi MJ, Smith TL, Fried MP, Kingdom TT. The use of image-guided surgery in endoscopic sinus surgery: an evidence-based review with recommendations. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2013;3(3):236–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Ramakrishnan VR, Kingdom TT. Does image-guided surgery reduce complications? Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2015;48(5):851–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Komotar RJ, Starke RM, Raper DM, Anand VK, Schwartz TH. Endoscopic endonasal versus open repair of anterior skull base CSF leak, meningocele, and encephalocele: a systematic review of outcomes. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg. 2013;74(04):239–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Acioly MA, Liebsch M, de Aguiar PH, Tatagiba M. Facial nerve monitoring during cerebellopontine angle and skull base tumor surgery: a systematic review from description to current success on function prediction. World Neurosurg. 2013;80(6):e271–300.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Nissen AJ, Sikand A, Curto FS, Welsh JE, Gardi J. Value of intraoperative threshold stimulus in predicting postoperative facial nerve function after acoustic tumor resection. Am J Otol. 1997;18(2):249–51.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Oh T, Nagasawa DT, Fong BM, et al. Intraoperative neuromonitoring techniques in the surgical management of acoustic neuromas. Neurosurg Focus. 2012;33(3):E6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Kartush JM, Larouere MJ, Graham MD, Bouchard KR, Audet BV. Intraoperative cranial nerve monitoring during posterior skull base surgery. Skull Base Surg. 1991;1(2):85–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Simon MV. Neurophysiologic intraoperative monitoring of the vestibulocochlear nerve. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2011;28(6):566–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Vincent C, Phillips A, Young M. Why do people sue doctors? A study of patients and relatives taking legal action. Lancet. 1994;343(8913):1609–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Brennan TA, Leape LL, Laird NM, et al. Incidence of adverse events and negligence in hospitalized patients. Results of the harvard medical practice study I. N Engl J Med. 1991;324(6):370–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Leape LL, Brennan TA, Laird N, et al. The nature of adverse events in hospitalized patients. Results of the harvard medical practice study II. N Engl J Med. 1991;324(6):377–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Localio AR, Lawthers AG, Brennan TA, et al. Relation between malpractice claims and adverse events due to negligence: results of the harvard medical practice study III. N Engl J Med. 1991;325(4):245–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Maithel SK. Iatrogenic error and truth telling: a comparison of the United States and India. Issues Med Ethics. 1998;6(4):125–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Witman AB, Park DM, Hardin SB. How do patients want physicians to handle mistakes?: a survey of internal medicine patients in an academic setting. Arch Intern Med. 1996;156(22):2565–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Mathew R, Asimacopoulos E, Valentine P. Toward safer practice in otology: a report on 15 years of clinical negligence claims. Laryngoscope. 2011;121(10):2214–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA

    Janet S. Choi

  2. Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA

    Joni K. Doherty

Authors
  1. Janet S. Choi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Joni K. Doherty
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joni K. Doherty .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery and Neurological Surgery, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA

    Edward C. Kuan

  2. Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA

    Bobby A. Tajudeen

  3. Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery and Neurological Surgery, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA

    Hamid R. Djalilian

  4. Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery and Neurological Surgery, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA

    Harrison W. Lin

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Choi, J.S., Doherty, J.K. (2023). Medicolegal Issues in Skull Base Reconstruction. In: Kuan, E.C., Tajudeen, B.A., Djalilian, H.R., Lin, H.W. (eds) Skull Base Reconstruction . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-27937-9_33

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-27937-9_33

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-27936-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-27937-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation