Abstract
Debridement is the excision of foreign, dead, dying, damaged, or infected tissues in order to optimize the healing potential of the remaining healthy and viable tissues. It is a time honored and vital step in wound bed preparation performed in a myriad of ways in preparation for soft tissue closure within the steps of the plastic and reconstructive ladder. Debridement is truly the foundation of and perhaps the single most important component in the wound management cascade but a thoughtful understanding and careful consideration of the patient, the wound, and possible methods of debridement are still vital to a successful outcome. Various modes of debridement exist and although most are readily available regardless of clinical setting, individual choice of debridement mode to undertake may depend on clinician and patient access to resources and the logistical feasibility of its implementation. The surgeon must adapt to the wound as it presents and evolves and cater treatment modalities to the patient and the environment in which they are treated. Regardless of the exact setting, it is preferred that the multidisciplinary approach be pursued and utilized.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Kamolz LP, Wild T. Wound bed preparation: the impact of debridement and wound cleansing. Wound Med. 2013;1:44–50.
Cornell RS, Meyr AJ, Steinberg JS, Attinger CE. Debridement of the noninfected wound. J Vasc Surg. 2010;52:31S–6S.
Guthrie HC, Clasper JC. Historical origins and current concepts of wound debridement. J R Army Med Corps. 2011;157:130–2.
Attinger CE, Clemens MW, Ducic I, Levin MM, Zelen C. The use of local muscle flaps in foot and ankle reconstruction. In: Dockery GD, editor. Lower extremity soft tissue & cutaneous plastic surgery. 2nd ed. Kidlington: Elsevier Science; 2011. p. 269–88.
Attinger CE, Janis JE, Steinberg JS, Schwartz J, Al-Attar A, Couch K. Clinical approach to wounds: debridement and wound bed preparation including the use of dressings and wound-healing adjuvants. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;111(Suppl 7):72S–109S.
Broughton G, Janis JE, Attinger CE. The basic science of wound healing. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;117(7 Suppl):12S–34S.
Shi E, Shofler D. Maggot debridement therapy: a systematic review. Br J Commun Nurs. 2014;Suppl Wound Care:S6–13. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjcn.2014.19.Sup12.S6.
DeFazio MV, Felder JM III, Economides JM, Attinger CE. Home improvement in Maggot therapy: designing a simple, cost-effective, closed-system habitat to facilitate biodébridement of complex distal lower extremity wounds. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;136(5):722e–3e.
Bunnell S. An essential in reconstructive surgery: atraumatic technique. Calif State J Med. 1921;19:204.
Kucan JO, Robson MC, Heggers JP, Ko F. Comparison of silver sulfadiazine, povidone-iodine and physiologic saline in the treatment of chronic pressure ulcers. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1981;29:232–5.
Tredget EE, Shankowsky HA, Groeneveld A, et al. A matched-pair, randomized study evaluating the efficacy and safety of Acticoat silver coated dressing for treatment of burn wounds. J Burn Care Rehabil. 1998;19:531–7.
Yin HQ, Langford R, Burrell RE. Comparative evaluation of the antimicrobial activity of Acticort antimicrobial dressing. J Burn Care Rehabil. 1999;20:195–200.
Vasquez JE, Walker ES, Franzus BW, et al. The epidemiology of mupirocin resistance among methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus at a Veterans’ Affairs hospital. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2000;21:459–64.
Andros G, Armstrong DG, Attinger CE, Boulton AJ, Frykberg RG, Joseph WS, Lavery LA, Morbach S, Niezgoda JA, Toursarkissian B, Tucson Expert Consensus Conference. Consensus statement on negative pressure wound therapy (V.A.C. Therapy) for the management of diabetic foot wounds. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2006 Jun;Suppl:1–32.
Lipsky BA, Berendt AR, Cornea PB, et al. 2012 Infectious Diseases Society of America clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of diabetic foot infections. Clin Infect Dis. 2012;54(12):e132–73.
Elmarsafi T, Garwood CS, Steinberg JS, Evans KK, Attinger CE, Kim PJ. Effect of semiquantitative culture results from complex host surgical wounds on dehiscence rates. Wound Repair Regen. 2017;25:210–6.
Carroll AM, Kim KG, Walters ET, Phillips BK, Singh B, Dekker PK, Steinberg JS, Attinger CE, Kim PJ, Evans KK. Glove and instrument changing to prevent bacterial contamination in infected wound debridement and closure procedures: a prospective observational study. Int Wound J. 2021;18:664.
Dorafshar AH, Gitman M, Henry G, Agarwal S, Gottlieb LJ. Guided surgical debridement: staining tissues with methylene blue. J Burn Care Res. 2010;31(5):791–4.
Krizek TJ, Robson MC. The evolution of quantitative bacteriology in wound management. Am J Surg. 1975;130:579–84.
Robson MC, Heggers JP. Delayed wound closure based on bacterial counts. J Surg Oncol. 1970;2:379–83.
Acknowledgments
No acknowledgements are made.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Attinger, C.E., Atves, J.N. (2023). Debridement of the Diabetic Foot and Leg. In: Attinger, C.E., Steinberg, J.S. (eds) Functional Limb Salvage. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-27725-2_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-27725-2_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-27724-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-27725-2
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)