Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Affect Theory and Literary Criticism ((PSATLC))

  • 36 Accesses

Abstract

On September 30, 2018, Elizabeth Warren wrote: “Brett Kavanaugh was allowed to be angry. Christine Blasey Ford wasn’t. Women—and people without power—grow up hearing that being angry makes us unattractive.” The previous day, Rebecca Traister wrote in a New York Times op-ed that in describing the traumatic events that had happened to her, Blasey Ford “did not yell, did not betray a hint of the fury she had every reason to feel as she was forced to put her pain on display for the nation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marion A. Wells .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Wells, M.A. (2023). Reflections on Everyday Affective Injustice. In: Gender, Affect, and Emotion from Classical to Early Modern Literature. Palgrave Studies in Affect Theory and Literary Criticism. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-27721-4_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics