Abstract
The thesis of this chapter is that property rights are the foundation of place managers’ authority to control behavior. We begin by showing the elements of a strong definition of control. We apply these elements to informal social control and show that it is not up to the job of curbing serious crime. Returning to place management, we show how the legal doctrine of property rights establishes place management authority. We make three points in this chapter. First, informal social control is too fuzzy of a concept to have the power needed to have much impact on serious crime. Second, place management is not informal social control because it differs from informal social control at least five ways. Third, place management authority to exercise control is strong, tangible, and recognized in law. Its roots are in the willingness of the state to define and enforce property rights.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Alchian, A. A., & Demsetz, H. (1973). The property right paradigm. The Journal of Economic History, 33(1), 16–27.
Burchfield, K. B. (2009). Attachment as a source of informal social control in urban neighborhoods. Journal of Criminal Justice, 37(1), 45–54.
Burgdorf, R. L., Jr. (1991). The Americans with Disabilities Act: Analysis and implications of a second-generation civil rights statute. Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review, 26(2), 413–522.
Carr, P. J. (2003). The new parochialism: The implications of the beltway case for arguments concerning informal social control. American Journal of Sociology, 108(6), 1249–1291.
Glotzer, P. (2020). How the suburbs were segregated: Developers and the business of exclusionary housing, 1890–1960. Columbia University Press.
Gotham, K. F. (2000). Urban space, restrictive covenants and the origins of racial residential segregation in a US city, 1900–50. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 24(3), 616–633.
Greenberg, S. W., & Rohe, W. M. (1984). Perspectives neighborhood design and crime: A test of two perspectives. Journal of the American Planning Association, 50(1), 48–61.
Groff, E. R. (2015). Informal social control and crime events. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 31(1), 90–106.
Honore’, A. M. (1961). Ownership. In A. G. Guest (Ed.), Oxford essays in Jurisprudence (pp. 370–375). Oxford University Press.
Johnson, D. R. (2015). Reflections on the bundle of rights. Vermont Law Review, 32(2), 247–272.
Kenton, W. (2020). Bundle of rights. Investopedia. October 30. https://www.investopedia.com/terms/b/bundle-of-rights.asp. Accessed 9 July 2021.
Kubrin, C. E., & Weitzer, R. (2003). New directions in social disorganization theory. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 40(4), 374–402.
Linning, S. J., Olaghere, A., Eck, J. E., & Steinman, H. (2022). What is informal social control? A review of the criminology literature, 2010-2020. Presentation at the Conference of the American Society of Criminology, Atlanta, GA, November 16.
Merrill, T. W., & Smith, H. E. (2010). Property. Oxford University Press.
Nash, J. K., & Bowen, G. L. (1999). Perceived crime and informal social control in the neighborhood as a context for adolescent behavior: A risk and resilience perspective. Social Work Research, 23(3), 171–186.
Neuwirth, R. (2006). Shadow cities: A billion squatters, a new urban world. Routledge.
Reynald, D. M. (2009). Guardianship in action: Developing a new tool for measurement. Crime Prevention and Community Safety: An International Journal, 11(1), 1–20.
Rose, C. M., & Brooks, R. R. W. (2016). Racial covenants and housing segregation, yesterday and today. In A. Brown & V. Smith (Eds.), Race and real estate (pp. 161–176). Oxford University Press.
Sampson, R. J., Raudenbush, S. W., & Earls, F. (1997). Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science, 277(5328), 918–924.
Sargeant, E., Murphy, K., McCarthy, M., & Williamson, H. (2021). The formal-informal control nexus during covid-19: What drives informal social control of social distancing restrictions during lockdown? Crime & Delinquency. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128721991824
Schlager, E., & Ostrom, E. (1992). Property-rights regimes and natural resources: A conceptual analysis. Land Economics, 68(3), 249–262.
Schulenberg, J. L. (2016). Police decision-making in the gray zone: The dynamics of police–citizen encounters with mentally ill persons. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 43(4), 459–482.
Silver, E., & Miller, L. L. (2004). Sources of informal social control in Chicago neighborhoods. Criminology, 42(3), 551–584.
Warner, B. D. (2014). Neighborhood factors related to the likelihood of successful informal social control efforts. Journal of Criminal Justice, 42(5), 421–430.
Wickes, R., & Hipp, J. R. (2018). The spatial and temporal dynamics of neighborhood informal social control and crime. Social Forces, 97(1), 277–308.
Wickes, R., Hipp, J. R., Sargeant, E., & Mazerolle, L. (2017). Neighborhood social ties and shared expectations for informal social control: Do they influence informal social control actions? Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 33(1), 101–129.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Eck, J.E., Linning, S.J., Herold, T.D. (2023). Sources of Powers. In: Place Management and Crime. SpringerBriefs in Criminology(). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-27693-4_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-27693-4_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-27692-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-27693-4
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)