Skip to main content

Construction Forecasting Using Time Series Volatility Models

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Construction Analytics
  • 160 Accesses

Abstract

Most linear time series models, including the univariate time series models, assume a time series has a constant variance over time. However, many construction time series data have not shown a constant variance. The volatility of a construction time series variable over time is challenging for accurate forecasting and risk management. This chapter discusses two time series volatility models (i.e., ARCH and GARCH) to forecast the variance of a construction time series. The ARCH and GARCH models are developed for modeling the volatility of the total federal construction spending time series published by the US Census Bureau. Then, the ARCH and GARCH models are combined with the ARIMA model to jointly estimate the mean and error variance of the total federal construction spending time series. The results show that the ARIMA-ARCH and ARIMA-GARCH models assuming a time-varying variance outperform the ARIMA model assuming a constant variance in terms of accuracy. R code examples are provided to develop time series volatility models and forecast a time series considering its time-varying variance. Exercise problems are presented at the end of the chapter for readers to review and practice the time series volatility models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Andersen, T. G., & Bollerslev, T. (1998). Answering the skeptics: Yes, standard volatility models do provide accurate forecasts. International Economic Review, 39, 885–905.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bollen, N. P., & Whaley, R. E. (2015). Futures market volatility: What has changed? Journal of Futures Markets, 35(5), 426–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bollerslev, T. (1986). Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity. Journal of Econometrics, 31(3), 307–327.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Brockwell, P. J., & Davis, R. A. (2016). Introduction to time-series and forecasting. Springer.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Danielsson, J. (2011). Financial risk forecasting: The theory and practice of forecasting market risk with implementation in R and Matlab (Vol. 588). Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engle, R. F. (1982). Autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity with estimates of the variance of United Kingdom inflation. Econometrica, 50(4), 987–1007.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Engle, R. F., & Patton, A. J. (2007). What good is a volatility model? In Forecasting volatility in the financial markets (pp. 47–63). Butterworth-Heinemann.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, T. J., & Gallagher, C. M. (2012). New weighted portmanteau statistics for time-series goodness of fit testing. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 107(498), 777–787.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ilbeigi, M., Castro-Lacouture, D., & Joukar, A. (2017). Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity model to quantify and forecast uncertainty in the price of asphalt cement. Journal of Management in Engineering, 33(5), 04017026.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jafari, G. R., Bahraminasab, A., & Norouzzadeh, P. (2007). Why does the standard GARCH(1, 1) model work well? International Journal of Modern Physics C, 18(07), 1223–1230.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Joukar, A., & Nahmens, I. (2016). Volatility forecast of construction cost index using general autoregressive conditional heteroskedastic method. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 142(1), 04015051.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miah, M., & Rahman, A. (2016). Modelling volatility of daily stock returns: Is GARCH(1,1) enough? American Scientific Research Journal for Engineering, Technology, and Sciences (ASRJETS), 18(1), 29–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsay, R. S. (2010). Analysis of financial time-series. Wiley.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Census Bureau, Construction Spending. (2022, September 1). Additional information on the survey methodology. Retrieved from www.census.gov/construction/c30/meth.html

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Shahandashti, M., Abediniangerabi, B., Zahed, E., Kim, S. (2023). Construction Forecasting Using Time Series Volatility Models. In: Construction Analytics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-27292-9_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-27292-9_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-27291-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-27292-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics