Abstract
Spondyloptosis is characterized by a complete slip of one vertebral body over another, most commonly seen at L5–S1. High-grade slips and spondyloptosis have been associated with a high pelvic incidence, increasing the shear forces across the lumbosacral junction, further aggravating the slip angle. In addition, spondyloptosis is often associated with back pain and symptoms of spinal canal stenosis, along with sagittal plane deformity with or without compensatory coronal plane deformity. While conservative management may be the first line of treatment for an adult patient, surgical intervention is often required to control patient symptoms and prevent further slippage, especially in a young patient. Surgical management options are controversial and range from neural decompression, in situ fusion, to partial or complete reduction of the listhesis with or without vertebral resection. In this chapter, we will review the different approaches to this problem described in the literature. The surgeon should tailor their management for the patient based on symptoms and the magnitude of deformity.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Mehdian SH, Arun R. A new three-stage spinal shortening procedure for reduction of severe adolescent isthmic spondylolisthesis: a case series with medium- to long-term follow up. Spine. 2011;11:E705–11.
Meyerding HW. Low backache and sciatic pain associated with spondylolisthesis and protruded intervertebral disc: incidence, significance and treatment. J Bone Jt Surg. 1941;23:461–70.
Wiltse L, Newman PH, Macnab I. Classification of spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis. Clin Orthop. 1976;117:23.
Taillard W. Les spondylolisthesis chez l’enfant et l’adolescent. Acta Orthop Scand. 1955;24:115.
Curylo LJ, Edwards C, Dewald RW. Radiographic markers in spondyloptosis implications for spondylolisthesis progression. Spine. 2002;27(18):2021–5.
Boisaubert B, Montigny JP, Duval-Beaupere G, et al. Incidence, sacrum, spondylolisthesis. Rachis. 1997;9:187–92.
Labelle H, Roussouly P, Berthonnaud E, et al. The importance of spino-pelvic balance in L5–S1 developmental spondylolisthesis: a review of pertinent radiologic measurements. Spine. 2005;30:S27–34.
Vaz G, Roussouly P, Berthonnaud E, et al. Sagittal morphology and equilibrium of pelvis and spine. Eur Spine J. 2002;11:80–7.
Di Martino A, et al. Spontaneous fusion of L5 spondyloptosis: should we learn from nature? Spine J. 2012;12(6):529.
Matsunaga S, Ijiri K, Hayashi K. Nonsurgically managed patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis: a 10- to 18-year follow-up study. J Neurosurg. 2000;93:194–8.
Seitsalo S. Operative and conservative treatment of moderate spondylolisthesis in young patients. J Bone Jt Surg Br. 1990;72:908–13.
Fredrickson BE, Baker D, McHolick WJ, et al. The natural history of spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 1984;66:699–707.
Floman Y. Progression of lumbosacral isthmic spondylolisthesis in adults. Spine. 2000;25:342.
Smith JA, Deviren V, Berven S, et al. Clinical outcome of trans-sacral interbody fusion after partial reduction for high-grade L5–S1 spondylolisthesis. Spine. 2001;26:2227–34.
Jo DJ, Seo EM, Kim KT, Kim SM, Lee SH. Lumbosacrao spondyloptosis treated suing partial reduction and pedicular transvertebral screw fixation in an osteoporotic elderly patient: case report. J Neurosurg Spine. 2012;16:206–9.
Gaines RW. L5 vertebrectomy of the surgical treatment of spondyloptosis: 30 cases in 25 years. Spine. 2005;30(65):566–70.
Bohlman HH, Cook SS. One-stage decompression and posterolateral and interbody fusion for lumbosacral spondyloptosis through a posterior approach. Report of two cases. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 1982;64:415–8.
Gollapudi PR, Kotakadira S, Nandigama PK, Karla R, Maila SK, Bugude NN. In situ posterolateral and fibular interbody fusion in high grade spondylolisthesis. Br J Neurosurg. 2013;27(4):454–8.
Donnally CJ, Madhavan K, Butler AJ, Sheu JI, Massel DH, Green BA, Gjolaj JP. A novel technique for stabilization of high grade spondylolisthesis with transvertebral fusion without reduction. J Clin Neurosci. 2019;60:170–5.
Laursen M, Thomsen K, Eiskjaer SP, et al. Functional outcome after partial reduction and 360° fusion in grade III–V spondylolisthesis in adolescent and adult patients. J Spinal Disord. 1999;12:300–6.
Molinari RW, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, et al. Anterior column support in surgery for high-grade, isthmic spondylolisthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;394:109–20.
Boxall D, Bradford DS, Winter RB, Moe JH. Management of severe spondylolisthesis in children and adolescents. J Bone Jt Surg. 1979;61A:479–95.
Ishikawa S, Kumar SJ, Torres BC. Surgical treatment of dysplastic spondylolisthesis. Results after in situ fusion. Spine. 1994;19:1691–6.
Hanson DS, Bridwell KH, Rhee JM, et al. Dowel fibular strut grafts for high-grade dysplastic isthmic spondylolisthesis. Spine. 2002;27:1982–8.
Schoenecker PL, Cole HO, Herring JA, et al. Cauda equina syndrome after in situ arthrodesis for severe spondylolisthesis at the lumbosacral junction. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 1990;72:369–77.
Sailhan F, Gollogly S, Roussouly P. The radiographic results and neurologic complications of instrumented reduction and fusion of high-grade spondylolisthesis without decompression of the neural elements: a retrospective review of 44 patients. Spine. 2006;31(2):161–9.
Sheer JK, Auffinger B, Wong RH, et al. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) for spondylolisthesis in 282 patients: in situ arthrodesis versus reduction. World Neurosurg. 2015;84(1):108–13.
Hresko MT, Labelle H, Roussoouly P, Berthonnaud E. Classification of high-grade spondylolistheses based on pelvic version and spine balance. Spine. 2007;32(20):2208–13.
Kawahara N, Tomita K, Kobayashi T, et al. Influence of acute shortening on the spinal cord: an experimental study. Spine. 2005;30:613–20.
Petraco DM, Spivak JM, Cappadona JG, et al. An anatomic evaluation of L5 nerve stretch in spondylolisthesis reduction. Spine. 1996;21:1133.
Bradford DS, Boachie-Adjei O. Treatment of severe spondylolisthesis by anterior and posterior reduction and stabilization. A long-term follow-up study. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 1990;72:1060–6.
Bradford D. Treatment of severe spondylolisthesis: a combined approach for reduction and stabilization. Spine. 1979;4:423–9.
Bradford D, Gotfried Y. Staged salvage reconstruction of grade IV and V spondylolisthesis. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 1987;69:191–202.
Gaines RW, Nichols WK. Treatment of spondyloptosis by two stage L5 vertebrectomy and reduction of L4 onto S1. Spine. 1985;10:680–6.
Kalra K, et al. A modified Gaines procedure for spondyloptosis. J Bone Jt Surg Br. 2010;92:1589–91.
Tian W, Zhao L. Treatment of L5–S1 spondyloptosis with multiple pedicle defects through a combined anterior and posterior approach. World Neurosurg. 2020;137:206–10.
Moshirfar A, Khanna AJ, Kebaish KM. Treatment of symptomatic spondyloptosis in an adult previously treated with in situ fusion and instrumentation by L5 vertebrectomy and L4–S1 instrumented reduction. Spine. 2007;7:100–5.
Acknowledgements
We want to acknowledge Drs. Ali M. Maziad and Oheneba Boachie-Adjei for their work on the first edition of this text, upon which this chapter is based.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Follett, M.A., Hu, S.S. (2023). Diagnosis and Management of Spondyloptosis. In: Wollowick, A.L., Sarwahi, V. (eds) Spondylolisthesis. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-27253-0_23
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-27253-0_23
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-27252-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-27253-0
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)