Skip to main content

Anterior to Psoas/OLIF Approach for Adult Spondylolisthesis

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Spondylolisthesis

Abstract

Degenerative spinal disease (DSD) is the main pathology among patients referred to neurosurgeons. Neurosurgical approaches to DSD draw on a vast armamentarium of anterior, lateral, or posterior spinal fusion techniques to manage and treat spinal diseases as diverse as spondylolisthesis, degenerative disc disease, recurrent disc herniation, pseudarthrosis, and spinal deformity. Choosing the optimal technique on a case-by-case basis can help minimize the risk of comorbidities associated with blood loss and length of hospitalization and to maximize postoperative fusion rate and clinical outcome for all patients, including those planning to return to their professional or sporting career. Here we briefly discuss the differences between the anterior and posterior approaches, focusing mainly on the surgical technique and main features of the oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF). The OLIF procedure is fast becoming an attractive choice for spine surgeons on account of the overall benefits associated with reduced damage to soft and nerve tissues and the sparing of the posterior structure. In the absence of major evidence-based indications in the literature with regard to the relative advantages and disadvantages of OLIF in cases of lumbar spondylolisthesis, this chapter aims to provide an illustrative overview of this case scenario, inclusive of a full description, surgical tips, and operative strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Zhang X, Guo Y, Li Y. Comparison of the clinical efficacy of two fixation methods combined with OLIF in the treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis in adult patients. J Orthop Surg Res. 2022;17:115.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Ravindra VM, et al. Degenerative lumbar spine disease: estimating global incidence and worldwide volume. Glob Spine J. 2018;8:784–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Resnick DK, et al. Guidelines for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 7: intractable low-back pain without stenosis or spondylolisthesis. J Neurosurg Spine. 2005;2:670–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Reisener M-J, Pumberger M, Shue J, Girardi FP, Hughes AP. Trends in lumbar spinal fusion—a literature review. J Spine Surg. 2020;6:752–61.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Miscusi M, et al. Comparison of pure lateral and oblique lateral inter-body fusion for treatment of lumbar degenerative disk disease: a multicentric cohort study. Eur Spine J. 2018;27:222–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Teng I, Han J, Phan K, Mobbs R. A meta-analysis comparing ALIF, PLIF, TLIF and LLIF. J Clin Neurosci. 2017;44:11–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Mobbs RJ, Phan K, Malham G, Seex K, Rao PJ. Lumbar interbody fusion: techniques, indications and comparison of interbody fusion options including PLIF, TLIF, MI-TLIF, OLIF/ATP, LLIF and ALIF. J Spine Surg. 2015;1:2–18.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Lan T, et al. Comparison between posterior lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World Neurosurg. 2018;112:86–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ricciardi L, et al. Lumbar interbody fusion using oblique (OLIF) and lateral (LLIF) approaches for degenerative spine disorders: a meta-analysis of the comparative studies. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2021;33(Suppl 2):3172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-021-03172-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Silvestre C, Mac-Thiong J-M, Hilmi R, Roussouly P. Complications and morbidities of mini-open anterior retroperitoneal lumbar interbody fusion: oblique lumbar interbody fusion in 179 patients. Asian Spine J. 2012;6:89–97.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Mayer HM. A new microsurgical technique for minimally invasive anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1997;22:691–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ohtori S, et al. Mini-open anterior retroperitoneal lumbar interbody fusion: oblique lateral interbody fusion for lumbar spinal degeneration disease. Yonsei Med J. 2015;56:1051–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Abbasi H, Abbasi A. Oblique lateral lumbar interbody fusion (OLLIF): technical notes and early results of a single surgeon comparative study. Cureus. 2015;7:e351.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Wang Z, et al. The OLIF working corridor based on magnetic resonance imaging: a retrospective research. J Orthop Surg Res. 2020;15:141.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Xu DS, et al. Minimally invasive anterior, lateral, and oblique lumbar interbody fusion: a literature review. Ann Transl Med. 2018;6:104.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Sato J, et al. Radiographic evaluation of indirect decompression of mini-open anterior retroperitoneal lumbar interbody fusion: oblique lateral interbody fusion for degenerated lumbar spondylolisthesis. Eur Spine J. 2017;26:671–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Fujibayashi S, et al. Effect of indirect neural decompression through oblique lateral interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar disease. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015;40:E175–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Li J, et al. Safety analysis of two anterior lateral lumbar interbody fusions at the initial stage of learning curve. World Neurosurg. 2019;127:e901–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Burkus JK, Gornet MF, Dickman CA, Zdeblick TA. Anterior lumbar interbody fusion using rhBMP-2 with tapered interbody cages. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2002;15:337–49.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Pavlov PW, et al. Good outcome and restoration of lordosis after anterior lumbar interbody fusion with additional posterior fixation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004;29:1893–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hung S-F, et al. Comparison of outcomes between indirect decompression of oblique lumbar interbody fusion and MIS-TLIF in one single-level lumbar spondylosis. Sci Rep. 2021;11:12783.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Anand N, et al. Analysis of spino-pelvic parameters and segmental lordosis with L5–S1 oblique lateral interbody fusion at the bottom of a long construct in circumferential minimally invasive surgical correction of adult spinal deformity. World Neurosurg. 2019;130:e1077–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Miscusi M, et al. The anterior-to-psoas approach for interbody fusion at the L5–S1 segment: clinical and radiological outcomes. Neurosurg Focus. 2020;49:E14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Berry CA, Thawrani DP, Makhoul FR. Inclusion of L5–S1 in oblique lumbar interbody fusion-techniques and early complications—a single center experience. Spine J. 2021;21:418–29.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kim J-S, Sharma SB. How I do it? Oblique lumbar interbody fusion at L5–S1 (OLIF51). Acta Neurochir. 2019;161:1079–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Mahatthanatrakul A, et al. Do obliquity and position of the oblique lumbar interbody fusion cage influence the degree of indirect decompression of foraminal stenosis? J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2022;65:74–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Limthongkul W, et al. Indirect decompression effect to central canal and ligamentum flavum after extreme lateral lumbar interbody fusion and oblique lumbar interbody fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2020;45:E1077–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Li G-Q, Tong T, Wang L-F. Comparative analysis of the effects of OLIF and TLIF on adjacent segments after treatment of L4 degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. J Orthop Surg Res. 2022;17:203.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Xi Z, et al. The effect of obesity on perioperative morbidity in oblique lumbar interbody fusion. J Neurosurg Spine. 2020;33:203–10. https://doi.org/10.3171/2020.1.SPINE191131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Quillo-Olvera J, Lin G-X, Jo H-J, Kim J-S. Complications on minimally invasive oblique lumbar interbody fusion at L2–L5 levels: a review of the literature and surgical strategies. Ann Transl Med. 2018;6:101.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Phan K, Maharaj M, Assem Y, Mobbs RJ. Review of early clinical results and complications associated with oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF). J Clin Neurosci. 2016;31:23–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Jin C, et al. Oblique lumbar interbody fusion for adjacent segment disease after posterior lumbar fusion: a case-controlled study. J Orthop Surg Res. 2019;14:216.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Wakita H, et al. Less invasive corrective surgery using oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) including L5–S1 fusion for severe lumbar kyphoscoliosis due to L4 compression fracture in a patient with Parkinson’s disease: a case report. BMC Res Notes. 2015;8:126.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Lin J-F, Iundusi R, Tarantino U, Moon M-S. Intravertebral plate and cage system via lateral trajectory for lumbar interbody fusion—a novel fixation device. Spine J. 2010;10:S86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Kim J-S, Choi WS, Sung JH. 314 Minimally invasive oblique lateral interbody fusion for L4–5: clinical outcomes and perioperative complications. Neurosurgery. 2016;63:190–1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Chang MC, Kim G-U, Choo YJ, Lee GW. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) versus oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) in interbody fusion technique for degenerative spondylolisthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Life. 2021;11:696.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Massimo Miscusi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Miscusi, M., Mangraviti, A., Forcato, S., Raco, A. (2023). Anterior to Psoas/OLIF Approach for Adult Spondylolisthesis. In: Wollowick, A.L., Sarwahi, V. (eds) Spondylolisthesis. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-27253-0_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-27253-0_18

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-27252-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-27253-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics