Skip to main content

Shari’a Law in Catholic Italy: A Non-agnostic Model of Accommodation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Sociology of Shari’a
  • 145 Accesses

Abstract

The Italian Constitution and its interpretation by the Constitutional Court have led to the development of a model of accommodation of religious practices that seeks to balance a commitment to promoting religious pluralism whilst, at the same time, maintaining the neutrality of state institutions. What is distinctive about this quasi-neutral constitutional stance is the commitment to reduce the discrepancies between the legal and religious effects of key life decisions. I call this stance ‘positive secularism.’ In this essay, I would like to show that, thus far, positive secularism has been particularly effective in accommodating the demands of Muslim immigrants. For instance, some aspects of the Shari’a law, such as marriage and divorce (including some effects of unilateral divorce), are already recognized by Italian international private law. The second stage for the accommodation of Shari’a law in Italy is likely to be the recognition of Islam as one of Italy’s official religions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Allievi, S. (2011). La Guerra delle moschee: La sfida del pluralismo religioso in Europa. Marsilio.

    Google Scholar 

  • Botta, R. (2000). Diritto alla moschea tra intesa Islamica e legislazioen regionale sull’ edilizia di culto. In S. Ferrari (Ed.), Musulmani in Italia: La condizione giuridica delle comunità Islamiche (pp. 109–130). Il Mulino.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brakenreg, E., & Possamai, A. (2009). Religious and spiritual diversity at a multi-campus suburban university: What type of need for chaplaincy? Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 31(4), 355–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breda, V. (2013). Balancing secularism with religious freedom: In Lautsi v Italy the European Court of Human Rights Evolved. In A. J. L. Menuge (Ed.), Legitimizing human rights. Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calvanese, E. (2011). Media e immigrazione tra stereotipi e pregiudizi: La rappresentazione dello straniero nel racconto giornalistico. FrancoAngeli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campiglio, C. (2008). Il diritto di famiglia Islamico nella prassi Italiana. Rivista di Diritto Privato Internazionale e Processuale, 44(1) http://giupint.unipv.it/pubblicazioni/Dottrina_Campiglio.pdf. Accessed 31 January 2013.

  • Casucelli, G. (2000). Le proposte d’intesa e l’ordinamento giuridico Italiano. In S. Ferrari (Ed.), Musulmani in Italia: La condizione giuridica delle comunità Islamiche (pp. 83–85). Il Mulino.

    Google Scholar 

  • Croce, M. (2006). Precedente giudiziale e giurisprudenza costituzionale. Contratto e Impresa, 4(5), 1114–1161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Croce, M. (2009). Libertà religiosa e laicità dello Stato in Italia: profili teorici, sviluppi giurisprudenziali e prassi incostituzionali. In S. Panizza & R. Romboli (Eds.), Temi e questioni di attualità costituzionale (pp. 115–127). CEDAM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doe, N. (2011). Law and religion in Europe: A comparative introduction. OUP.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Eurispes. (2011). Rapporto Italia 2010. Eurispes, Istituto di Ricerca degli Italiani.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrante, A. (2017). Fenomeni migratori, diritti umani e libertà religiosa.Libreria. Universitaria.it.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrari, S. (2000). Introduction. In S. Ferrari (Ed.), Musulmani in Italia: La condizione giuridica delle comunità Islamiche (pp. 7–18). Il Mulino.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fon, V., & Parisi, F. (2006). Judicial precedents in civil law systems: A dynamic analysis. International Review of Law and Economics, 26(4), 519–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guolo, R. (2000). La rappresentanza dell’Islam Italiano e la questione delle intese. In S. Ferrari (Ed.), Musulmani in Italia: La condizione giuridica delle comunità Islamiche (pp. 67–82). Il Mulino.

    Google Scholar 

  • Istituto Nazionale di Statistica. (2021). Indicatori demografici. Anno 2021. Stranieri residenti e condizioni di vita: Cittadinanza e presenza in Italia, Rome, Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamali, M. H. (2008). Shari’ah law: An introduction. Oneworld.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamb, R. (2011). When human rights have gone too far: Religious tradition and equality in Lautsi v. Italy. International Law and Commercial Regulation, 36(3), 751.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, G. (1990). Alle origini del pluralismo confessionale: Il dibattito sulla liberta religiosa nell’eta della Costituente. Societa editrice Il Mulino.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGoldrick, D. (2011). Religion in the European Public Square and European Public Life: Crucifixes in the classroom? Human Rights Law Review, 11, 451–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ministero dell’Interno. (2012). Archivio Storico delle Elezioni – Camera del 21 Aprile 1996. http://elezionistorico.interno.it/index.php?tpel=C&dtel=21/04/1996&tpa=I&tpe=A&lev0=0&levsut0=0&es0=S&ms=S. Accessed 26 January 2013.

  • Nascinbene, B. (2000). Straniero e Musulmano: Profili relative alle cause di discriminazione. In S. Ferrari (Ed.), Musulmani in Italia: La condizione giuridica delle comunità Islamiche (pp. 235–241). Il Mulino.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pacini, A. (2001). I Musulmani in Italia. In S. Ferrari (Ed.), Musulmani in Italia: La condizione giuridica delle comunità Islamiche. http://www.cestim.it/argomenti/02islam/02islam-relazione-pacini.pdf. Accessed 3 February 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenfeld, M. (2008). Can constitutionalism, secularism and religion be reconciled in an era of globalization and religious revival. Cardozo Law Review, 30, 2333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sajó, A. (2008). Preliminaries to a concept of constitutional secularism. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 6(3–4), 605–629.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Senato della Republica. (2007). Constitution of the Italian Republic. http://www.senato.it/documenti/repository/istituzione/costituzione_inglese.pdf. Accessed 17 April 2013.

  • Shachar, A. (2001). Multicultural jurisdictions: Cultural differences and women’s rights. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Spano, F. (2009). La Rivoluzione discreta a centosessan’anni dalle â™ Lettere Patenti. Quaderni di Diritto e Politica Ecclesiastica, 1, 219–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viellechner, L. (2009). The network of networks: Karl Heinz Ladeur’s theory of law and globalization. German Law Journal, 10(4) http://www.germanlawjournal.com/pdfs/Vol10No04/PDF_Vol_10_No_04_515-536_SI_Articles_Viellechner.pdf. Accessed 15 April 2013.

  • Welchman, L. (2011). A Husband’s authority: Emerging formulations in muslim family Laws. International Journal of Law, Policy, and the Family, 25(1), 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Legislation

Case Law

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vito Breda .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Breda, V. (2023). Shari’a Law in Catholic Italy: A Non-agnostic Model of Accommodation. In: Possamai, A., Richardson, J.T., Turner, B.S. (eds) The Sociology of Shari’a. Boundaries of Religious Freedom: Regulating Religion in Diverse Societies. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-27188-5_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics