Skip to main content

Introduction: Legal Pluralism and Shari’a

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Sociology of Shari’a

Abstract

This introduction situates the book in the current field of research and aims to find some generalizations out of the diversity of legal pluralist practices from around the world.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    But even in the U.K. legal pluralism is demonstrated by the presence of a separate legal tradition in Scotland.

References

  • Ackerman-Lieberman, P. (2014). Legal pluralism among court records of medieval Egypt. Bulletin d’études orientales, 63, 79–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anwar, S. (2005). Fatwa, Purification and Dynamization: a study of Tarjih in Muhammadiyah. In D. S. Powers (Ed.), Islamic Law and Society (pp. 27–44). Leiden Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayat, A. (2017). Revolution without revolutionaries. Making Sense of the Arab Spring. Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, M. (2004). Dispute resolution in family law: Protecting choice, promoting inclusion. Executive summary. Ontario Ministry of Attorney General. http://www.attorneygeneral.jus.gov.on.ca/english/about/pubs/boyd/

  • Center for Security Policy. (2011). Shariah law and American state courts: An assessment of state appellate court cases. Occasional Paper Series. http://shariahinamericancourts.com/

  • Charney, J. (1993). Universal international law. American Journal of International Law, 87(4), 529–551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charney, J. (Ed.). (2002). International maritime boundaries (2 volumes). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choksy, C. E. B., & Choksy, J. K. (2015). The Saudi connection: Wahhabism and global Jihad. World Affairs, 178(1), 23–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, K. M. (2009). Fictions of justice: The international criminal court and the challenge of legal pluralism in sub-Saharan Africa. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. L. (2012). Globalization and sovereignty: Rethinking legality, legitimacy, and constitutionalism. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • de Sousa Santos, B. (1995). Toward a new common sense: Law, science and politics in paradigmatic transition. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Sousa Santos, B., & Rodriguez-Garavito, C. A. (Eds.). (2005). Law and globalization from below: Towards a cosmopolitan legality. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillon, M. (2018). Xinjiang in the twenty-first century: Islam, ethnicity and resistance. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich, E. (2001 [1936]). Fundamental principles of the sociology of law. Transaction.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erie, M. (2016). China and Islam. The prophet, the party and the law. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gladney, C. (2004). Dislocating China: Muslims, minorities, and other subaltern subjects and ethnic identity in China: The making of a Muslim minority. University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffith, J. (1986). What is legal pluralism? Journal of Legal Pluralism, 24, 1–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hallaq, W. (2005). The origins and evolution of Islamic law. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallaq, W. (2009a). An introduction to Islamic law. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hallaq, W. (2009b). Shari’a: Theory, practice, transformations. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hallaq, W. B. (2018). Restating orientalism. A critique of modern knowledge. Columbia University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, H. L. A. (1977). Is law a system of rules? In R. M. Dworkin (Ed.), The philosophy of law (pp. 38–65). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hosen, N. (2007). Shari’a and constitutional reform in Indonesia. Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hummel, D. (2020). Legislating islamophobia: The factors for the existence of anti-Sharia laws in the United States. Public Policy and Administration, 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, S. A. (2006). Legal Pluralism Between Islam and the Nation-State: Romantic Medievalism or Pragmatic Modernity. Fordham International Law Journal, 30(1), 158–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joppke, C., & Torpey, J. (2013). The legal integration of Islam: A transatlantic comparison. Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kamaludeen, M. N., Pereira, A., & Turner, B. S. (2010). Muslims in Singapore: Piety, politics and policies. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemper, M., & Reinkowski, M. (Eds.). (2005). Rechtspluralismus in der Islamische Welt. Peter de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kyed, H. M. (2009). The politics of legal pluralism: State policies on legal pluralism and their local dynamics in Mosambique. Journal of Legal Pluralism and unofficial law, 41(59), 87–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Layish, A. (1987). Saudi Arabian Legal Reforms as a Mechanism to Moderate Wahhabi Doctrine. Journal of the American Oriental Society, 107(2), 279–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Llewellyn, K., & Hoebel, E. A. (1941). The Cheyenne way: Conflict and case law in primitive jurisprudence. University of Oklahoma Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Messick, B. (1922). The calligraphic state. Textual domination and history in a Muslim society. University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milbank, J. (2010). The archbishop of Canterbury: The man and the theology behind the Shari’a lecture. In R. Ahdar & N. Aroney (Eds.), Shari’a in the west (pp. 43–57). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neklen, D. (1984). Law in action or living law? Back to the beginning in sociology of law. Legal Studies, 4, 157–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pound, R. (1966). An introduction to the philosophy of law. Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pound, R. (2009). Fundamental principles of the sociology of law (pp. lxi–lxviii). Transaction.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powers, D. S. (2010). Wael B. Hallaq on the origin of Islamic law. A review essay. Islamic Law and Society, 17(1), 126–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roy, O. (2004). Globalised Islam. The Search for a New Ummah. Hurst & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sachs, W. L. (2009). Homosexuality and the crisis of Anglicanism. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sezgin, Y. (2013). Human rights under state enforced religious family Laws in Israel, Egypt, and India. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sieder, R. (2002). Recognising indigenous law and the politics of state formation in Mesoamerica. In R. Sieder (Ed.), Multiculturalism in Latin America: Indigenous rights, diversity and democracy (pp. 184–207). Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, P. L. (2002). Courts or tribunals? Federal Courts and the common law. 53 ALA. L. REV., 891. Available at: https://scholarship.law.columbia.edu/faculty_scholarship/1260

  • Tamanaha, B. Z. (1997). Realistic socio-legal theory: Pragmatism and a social theory of law. Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tamanaha, B. Z. (2008). Understanding legal pluralism: Past to present, local to global. Sydney Law Review, 30, 375–411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teubner, G. (Ed.). (1997). Global law without a state. Dartmouth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, B. S. (2014). Legal pluralism, state sovereignty, and citizenship. In A. Possamai, J. Richardson, & B. Turner (Eds.), Legal pluralism and Shari’a law (pp. 7–28). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, B. S., & Arslan, Z. B. (2011). Shari’a and legal pluralism in the West. European Journal of Social Theory, 14(1), 139–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, B. S., & Richardson, J. T. (2012). Islam and the problems of liberal democracy. In M. S. Berger (Ed.), Applying Shari’a in the West (pp. 47–64). Leiden University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, B. S., & Richardson, J. T. (2013). Islam and the problems of liberal democracy. In M. S. Berger (Ed.), Applying Shari’a in the West (pp. 47–64). Leiden University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Twining, W. (2000). Globalisation and legal theory. Butterworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1978). Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology (2 volumes). University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bryan S. Turner .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Turner, B.S., Richardson, J.T., Possamai, A. (2023). Introduction: Legal Pluralism and Shari’a. In: Possamai, A., Richardson, J.T., Turner, B.S. (eds) The Sociology of Shari’a. Boundaries of Religious Freedom: Regulating Religion in Diverse Societies. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-27188-5_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics