Skip to main content

On the Parameterized Complexity of Compact Set Packing

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
WALCOM: Algorithms and Computation (WALCOM 2023)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 13973))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 371 Accesses

Abstract

The Set Packing problem is, given a collection of sets \({\mathcal S}\) over a ground set \({\mathcal U}\), to find a maximum collection of sets that are pairwise disjoint. The problem is among the most fundamental NP-hard optimization problems that have been studied extensively in various computational regimes. The focus of this work is on parameterized complexity, Parameterized Set Packing (PSP): Given \(r \in {\mathbb N}\), is there a collection \( {\mathcal S}' \subseteq {\mathcal S}: |{\mathcal S}'| = r\) such that the sets in \({\mathcal S}'\) are pairwise disjoint? Unfortunately, the problem is not fixed parameter tractable unless \(\textsf {W[1]} = \textsf {FPT} \), and, in fact, an “enumerative” running time of \(|{\mathcal S}|^{\varOmega (r)}\) is required unless the exponential time hypothesis (ETH) fails. This paper is a quest for tractable instances of Set Packing from parameterized complexity perspectives. We say that the input \(({\mathcal U},{\mathcal S})\) is “compact” if \(|{\mathcal U}| = f(r)\cdot \varTheta (\textsf {poly} ( \log |{\mathcal S}|))\), for some \(f(r) \ge r\). In the Compact PSP problem, we are given a compact instance of PSP. In this direction, we present a “dichotomy” result of PSP: When \(|{\mathcal U}| = f(r)\cdot o(\log |{\mathcal S}|)\), PSP is in FPT, while for \(|{\mathcal U}| = r\cdot \varTheta (\log (|{\mathcal S}|))\), the problem is W[1]-hard; moreover, assuming ETH, Compact PSP does not admit \(|{\mathcal S}|^{o(r/\log r)}\) time algorithm even when \(|{\mathcal U}| = r\cdot \varTheta (\log (|{\mathcal S}|))\). Although certain results in the literature imply hardness of compact versions of related problems such as \(\textsc {Set}\) r-Covering and \(\textsc {Exact}\) r-Covering, these constructions fail to extend to Compact PSP. A novel contribution of our work is the identification and construction of a gadget, which we call Compatible Intersecting Set System pair, that is crucial in obtaining the hardness result for Compact PSP. Finally, our framework can be extended to obtain improved running time lower bounds for \(\textsc {Compact}\) r-VectorSum.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In fact there is another way to define compactness: when \(|{\mathcal S}| = f(r) \cdot \varTheta ( \textsf {poly} (\log |{\mathcal U}|))\). However in this case, the enumerative algorithm running in time \(O^{*}(|{\mathcal S}|^r)\) is already fixed parameter tractable [6]. Thus, the interesting case is when the universe is compact, which is the case we will be focusing on.

References

  1. Ausiello, G., D’Atri, A., Protasi, M.: Structure preserving reductions among convex optimization problems. J. Comput. Syst. Sci. 21(1), 136–153 (1980)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Austrin, P., Khot, S., Safra, M.: Inapproximability of vertex cover and independent set in bounded degree graphs. In: 2009 24th Annual IEEE Conference on Computational Complexity, pp. 74–80. IEEE (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bansal, N., Gupta, A., Guruganesh, G.: On the lovász theta function for independent sets in sparse graphs. SIAM J. Comput. 47(3), 1039–1055 (2018)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Bhattacharyya, A., Gadekar, A., Ghoshal, S., Saket, R.: On the hardness of learning sparse parities. In: Sankowski, P., Zaroliagis, C. (eds.) 24th Annual European Symposium on Algorithms (ESA 2016). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), vol. 57, pp. 1–17. Schloss Dagstuhl-Leibniz-Zentrum fuer Informatik, Dagstuhl, Germany (2016). https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.ESA.2016.11, http://drops.dagstuhl.de/opus/volltexte/2016/6362

  5. Björklund, A., Husfeldt, T., Koivisto, M.: Set partitioning via inclusion-exclusion. SIAM J. Comput. 39(2), 546–563 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Cai, L., Juedes, D.: Subexponential parameterized algorithms collapse the w-hierarchy. In: Orejas, F., Spirakis, P.G., van Leeuwen, J. (eds.) ICALP 2001. LNCS, vol. 2076, pp. 273–284. Springer, Heidelberg (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48224-5_23

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Chalermsook, P., et al.: From Gap-ETH to FPT-inapproximability: clique, dominating set, and more. In: 2017 IEEE 58th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS), pp. 743–754. IEEE (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chan, Y.H., Lau, L.C.: On linear and semidefinite programming relaxations for hypergraph matching. Math. program. 135(1–2), 123–148 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Chataigner, F., Manić, G., Wakabayashi, Y., Yuster, R.: Approximation algorithms and hardness results for the clique packing problem. Discrete Appl. Math. 157(7), 1396–1406 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Cygan, M.: Improved approximation for 3-dimensional matching via bounded pathwidth local search. In: 2013 IEEE 54th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pp. 509–518. IEEE (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cygan, M., et al.: Parameterized Algorithms, 1st edn. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21275-3

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Downey, R.G., Fellows, M.R.: Parameterized Complexity. Springer, Cham (2012)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Halldórsson, M.M., Kratochvıl, J., Telle, J.A.: Independent sets with domination constraints. Discret. Appl. Math. 99(1–3), 39–54 (2000)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Hassin, R., Rubinstein, S.: An approximation algorithm for maximum triangle packing. Discrete Appl. Math. 154(6), 971–979 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Hastad, J.: Clique is hard to approximate within n1-. In: Proceedings of the 37th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science FOCS 1996, p. 627. IEEE Computer Society, USA (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hazan, E., Safra, S., Schwartz, O.: On the complexity of approximating k-set packing. Comput. Complex. 15(1), 20–39 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00037-006-0205-6

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Jones, M., Lokshtanov, D., Ramanujan, M.S., Saurabh, S., Suchý, O.: Parameterized complexity of directed Steiner tree on sparse graphs. In: Bodlaender, H.L., Italiano, G.F. (eds.) ESA 2013. LNCS, vol. 8125, pp. 671–682. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40450-4_57

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Lin, B.: A Simple gap-producing reduction for the parameterized set cover problem. In: Baier, C., Chatzigiannakis, I., Flocchini, P., Leonardi, S. (eds.) 46th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2019). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), vol. 132, pp. 81:1–81:15. Schloss Dagstuhl-Leibniz-Zentrum fuer Informatik, Dagstuhl, Germany (2019). https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2019.81, http://drops.dagstuhl.de/opus/volltexte/2019/10657

  19. Lin, B.: Constant approximating k-clique is w[1]-hard. In: Khuller, S., Williams, V.V. (eds.) STOC 2021: 53rd Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing, Virtual Event, Italy, 21–25 June 2021, pp. 1749–1756. ACM (2021). https://doi.org/10.1145/3406325.3451016

  20. Marx, D.: Can you beat treewidth? In: 48th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS 2007), pp. 169–179. IEEE (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Pătraşcu, M., Williams, R.: On the possibility of faster SAT algorithms. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-First Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, pp. 1065–1075. SIAM (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Karthik, C.S., Khot, S.: Almost polynomial factor inapproximability for parameterized k-clique (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Karthik, C.S., Laekhanukit, B., Manurangsi, P.: On the parameterized complexity of approximating dominating set. In: Proceedings of the 50th Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing, pp. 1283–1296. STOC 2018, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA (2018). https://doi.org/10.1145/3188745.3188896

  24. Vemuganti, R.: Applications of set covering, set packing and set partitioning models: a survey. In: Du, DZ., Pardalos, P.M. (eds.) Handbook of Combinatorial Optimization, pp. 573–746. Springer, Boston (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-0303-9_9

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work has been partially supported by European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (grant agreement No. 759557). I thank Parinya Chalermsook for the informative discussions about the results in the paper, and for providing guidance on writing this paper. I also thank anonymous reviewers for their valuable suggestions on improving the readability of the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ameet Gadekar .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Gadekar, A. (2023). On the Parameterized Complexity of Compact Set Packing. In: Lin, CC., Lin, B.M.T., Liotta, G. (eds) WALCOM: Algorithms and Computation. WALCOM 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13973. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-27051-2_30

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-27051-2_30

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-27050-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-27051-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics