Abstract
This chapter explains how the industry arrived at its current state. It shows that the Australian industry has evolved across four distinctive eras, and it details the factors contributing to these new growth waves. The chapter evidences the rapid growth in think tank numbers over the past two decades and shows that the prior impediments to the industry’s development no longer persist. The evidence suggests that the Australian industry is not as small or as insignificant as some might suggest. It has matured to the extent that its size is comparable (on a relative basis) to those industries in countries with longer histories.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Stone (1998, p. 146) suggests that Australia’s first ‘proto-typical’ think tanks were the Institute of Pacific Relations (an antecedent to the AIIA) and The Round Table, but this study could not establish the formation dates of these defunct entities.
- 2.
Marsh and Stone do not precisely define these three periods but provide sufficient guidance to enable their analysis.
- 3.
Most of the defunct institutes in prior think tank lists (sixteen of the one-hundred-and-eighty-four entities originally identified for candidacy) were government- or university-affiliated entities, not ideologically oriented (left- and right-leaning) entities. This point is important in the wave theory context. To be sure, many of the defunct entities are unlikely to have been included in this study even if they had endured. The main text discusses the defunct entities with a discernible ideological bias.
- 4.
The ‘modified population’ includes the present study’s population (ninety-three institutes) plus six defunct institutes extracted from extant lists (see Chapter 3).
- 5.
The Australian Institute of Public Policy was established in 1982 and merged with the IPA in 1991 (Marsh & Stone, 2004, p. 248). As such, it is not a constituent of the present population.
- 6.
Right-leaning think tanks formed during this third wave include the Menzies Research Centre, Institute for Private Enterprise, Mannkal Economic Education Foundation, Samuel Griffith Society, and the defunct Tasman Institute, Bennelong Society, and Lavoisier Group.
- 7.
Robert (Bob) Hawke from the Australian Labor Party was elected Prime Minister in 1983 and served until 1991. Paul Keating (also from the ALP) served as Prime Minister from 1991 until 1996. This period is widely referred to as the ‘Hawke-Keating era’ (Economou, 2014, pp. 172–173).
- 8.
The present analysis references 1990 as the start date for Marsh and Stone’s ‘third-wave’. Only one think tank (the Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research) was established in 1990, so the results are not sensitive to that selection.
- 9.
The reduction in APS headcount lessened the ability of the APS to proffer policy ideas—a so-called ‘hollowing out of the state’ (see Denham & Garnett, 2004). The APS headcount fell from approximately one-hundred-and-forty-three thousand at the end of 1996 (Howard’s election year) to a low point of approximately one-hundred-and-ten thousand in 2000. However, the APS headcount exceeded the number Howard originally inherited by the completion of his final year in office in 2006 (Whelan, 2011).
- 10.
Kevin Rudd from the Australian Labor Party defeated Prime Minister Howard in the Federal election on December 3, 2007.
- 11.
The eight government-affiliated entities in the present population are excluded from this analysis because they are not DGR-eligible.
- 12.
According to the Australian Taxation Office, think tanks qualify for DGR status if they are Approved Research Institutes. That is, they ‘undertake scientific research’ and have ‘suitably qualified research committees that evaluate the merits of proposed research programs’ (ATO, 2017).
- 13.
Strikingly, the CIS is one of the very few entities explicitly named as a DGR-endorsed entity within the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997. The naming of CIS in Section 30–40 (Research) of the Act is highly unusual. Indeed, the Australian Tax Office refers to naming DGR-endorsed entities as ‘exceptional’ (ATO, 2017). The other think tanks explicitly named in the Act (only fourteen organisations are named in total) are the Menzies Research Centre, Chifley Research Centre, Page Research Centre, Green Institute, Grattan Institute, and the United States Studies Centre (Australian Government, 2020). But the CIS stands out as an openly ideological (arguably partisan), non-party-affiliated entity—and government legislation individually identifies it as qualifying for DGR status.
- 14.
See Gulmanelli (2014, pp. 582–585) for a detailed discussion on the characteristics and constituents of the ‘Anglosphere’.
- 15.
This analysis necessarily assumes that the GGTTI index accurately calculates the think tank populations for Canada, the UK, and the US. This assumption is credible given the regular scholarly scrutiny of these industries.
- 16.
- 17.
Table 4.1 contains the list of seven prominent autonomous institutes this study identified.
- 18.
It should be noted that CEDA—which was founded in 1960—is part of this study’s first wave of institutes, but is uniquely focussed on economics-related interests.
References
Abelson, D. E. (1996). American think-tanks and their role in US foreign policy. Macmillan Press.
Abelson, D. E. (2004). The business of ideas: The think tank industry in the USA. In D. Stone & A. Denham (Eds.), Think tank traditions: Policy research and the politics of ideas (pp. 215–231). Manchester University Press.
Abelson, D. E. (2006). A capitol idea: Think tanks and US foreign policy. McGill-Queen's University Press.
Abelson, D. E. (2009). Do think tanks matter?: Assessing the impact of public policy institutes (2nd Ed.). McGill-Queen's University Press.
Abelson, D. E. (2016). Northern lights: Exploring Canada's think tank landscape. McGill-Queen's University Press.
Abelson, D. E., Brooks, S., & Hua, X. (Eds.). (2018). Think tanks, foreign policy and geo-politics: Pathways to influence (1st Ed.). Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
ABS. (2021). Employment and earnings, public sector, Australia. Retrieved October 29, 2021, from. Australian Bureau of Statistics: https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/labour/employment-and-unemployment/employment-and-earnings-public-sector-australia/latest-release
AIIA. (2020). About us. Australian Institute of International Affairs. https://www.internationalaffairs.org.au/about-us/. Accessed June 7, 2020.
ATO. (2017). Is my organisation eligible for DGR endorsement?. Australian Taxation Office. Australian Government. https://www.ato.gov.au/non-profit/getting-started/getting-endorsed/is-my-organisation-eligible-for-dgr-endorsement-/. Accessed April 5, 2020.
Australian Business Register. (2020). ABN Lookup (online database). Retrieved April 5, 2020, from Australian Government: https://abr.business.gov.au/Search
Australian Government. (2020). Income Tax Assessment Act 1997. Australian Government. https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/C2020C00113. Accessed April 5, 2020.
Bakija, J. (2013). Tax policy and philanthropy: A primer on the empirical evidence for the United States. Social Research, 80(2), 557–584.
Cahill, D. (2004). The radical neo-liberal movement as a hegemonic force in Australia, 1976–1996 (PhD Thesis). University of Wollongong, NSW.
Cahill, D. (2013). Ideas-centred explanations of the rise of neoliberalism: A critique. Australian Journal of Political Science, 48(1), 71–84.
Cham, E. (2016). Trustee companies: Their role in Australian philanthropy (PhD Thesis). University of Technology, Sydney, Sydney.
Denham, A. (1996). Think-tanks of the new right. Dartmouth.
Denham, A., & Garnett, M. (1999). Influence without responsibility? Think-tanks in Britain. Parliamentary Affairs, 52(1), 46–57.
Denham, A., & Garnett, M. (2004). A ‘hollowed-out’ tradition? British think tanks in the twenty-first century. In D. Stone & A. Denham (Eds.), Think tank traditions: Policy research and the politics of ideas (pp. 232–246). Manchester University Press.
Duffin, E. (2021). Number of government employees in the U.S. from 1982 to 2020. Retrieved October 29, 2021, from Statista. https://www.statista.com/statistics/204535/number-of-governmental-employees-in-the-us/
Economou, N. (2014). The Australian Labor Party. In A. Fenna, J. Robbins, & J. Summers (Eds.), Government and politics in Australia (10th Ed.). Pearson Australia.
Fung, A., Russon Gilman, H., & Shkabatur, J. (2013). Six models for the internet + politics. International Studies Review, 15(1), 30–47.
Gauja, A. (2015). The state of democracy and representation in Australia. Representation, 51(1), 1–12.
Gulmanelli, S. (2014). John Howard and the ‘Anglospherist’ reshaping of Australia. Australian Journal of Political Science, 49(4), 1–15.
Gyngell, A. (2016). The rumble of think tanks: National security and public policy contestability in Australia. In D. Marston & T. Leahy (Eds.), War, strategy and history: Essays in Honour of Professor Robert O’Neill. ANU Press.
Head, B., & Banerjee, S. (2020). Policy expertise and use of evidence in a populist era. Australian Journal of Political Science, 55(1), 110–121.
Howard, J. (2001). Community-business partnership develops new tax initiatives to promote philanthropy (Press release). https://pmtranscripts.pmc.gov.au/release/transcript-12131
Kelly, D. (2017). Political troglodytes and economic lunatics? Advocacy groups of the Australian right (PhD Thesis). La Trobe University, Melbourne.
Lindquist, E. (1989). Behind the myth of think tanks: The organization and relevance of Canadian policy institutes (PhD Thesis). University of California, Berkeley.
Lowy. (2021). What we do. Lowy Institute for International Policy. Lowy Institute for International Policy. https://www.lowyinstitute.org/about/what-we-do. Accessed September 1, 2021.
Marsh, I. (1980). An Australian think tank?: Lessons Australia can learn from independent public policy research institutes in the United States, United Kingdom and Canada. New South Wales University Press.
Marsh, I. (1994). The development and impact of Australia’s “think tanks.” Australian Journal of Management, 19(2), 177–200.
Marsh, I. (2005). Opinion formation. In P. Saunders & J. Walter (Eds.), Ideas and influence: Social science and public policy in Australia. UNSW Press.
Marsh, I., & Stone, D. (2004). Australian think tanks. In D. Stone & A. Denham (Eds.), Think tank traditions: Policy research and the politics of ideas (1st ed., pp. 247–263). Manchester University Press.
McGann, J. G. (1992). Academics to ideologues: A brief history of the public policy research industry. PS: Political Science and Politics, 25(4), 733–740.
McGann, J. G. (2007). Think tanks and policy advice in the United States: Academics, advisors and advocates (Vol. 1). Routledge.
McGann, J. G. (2009). 2008 global go to think tank index report. University of Pennsylvania. https://repository.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=&httpsredir=1&article=1000&context=think_tanks
McGann, J. G. (2011). 2010 global go to think tank index report. University of Pennsylvania. https://repository.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1004&context=think_tanks
McGann, J. G. (2016). The fifth estate: Think tanks, public policy, and governance. Brookings Institution Press.
McGann, J. G. (2020). 2019 global go to think tank index report. University of Pennsylvania. https://repository.upenn.edu/think_tanks/17
McGann, J. G. (2021). 2020 global go to think tank index report. University of Pennsylvania. https://repository.upenn.edu/think_tanks/18?utm_source=repository.upenn.edu%2Fthink_tanks%2F18&utm_medium=PDF&utm_campaign=PDFCoverPages
McGann, J. G., & Weaver, R. K. (Eds.). (2002). Think tanks & civil societies: Catalysts for ideas and action (3rd ed.). Transaction Publishers.
McGregor-Lowndes, M., Newton, C., & Marsden, S. (2006). Did tax incentives play any part in increased giving? Australian Journal of Social Issues, 41(4), 495–509.
McLeod, J. (2014). The PAF report—Record fund numbers and distributions. https://www.cacwa.org.au/documents/item/280
ONS. (2020). Public sector employment. Retrieved October 29, 2021, from Office for National Statistics. https://www.ons.gov.uk/employmentandlabourmarket/peopleinwork/publicsectorpersonnel/datasets/publicsectoremploymentreferencetable
Quiggin, J. (2005). Economic liberalism: Fall, revival, and resistance. In P. Saunders & J. Walter (Eds.), Ideas and influence: Social science and public policy in Australia (pp. 21–43). University of New South Wales Press Ltd.
Sargeant, A., & Crissman, K. (2006). Corporate giving in Australia: An analysis of motives and barriers. Australian Journal of Social Sciences, 41(4).
Smith, J. (1991). The idea brokers: Think tanks and the rise of the new policy elite. The Free Press.
Stahl, J. M. (2016). Right moves: The conservative think tank in American political culture since 1945. The University of North Carolina Press.
StatCan. (2019). Employment by class of worker, monthly, seasonally adjusted (x 1,000). Retrieved October 29, 2021, from Statistics Canada. https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/t1/tbl1/en/tv.action?pid=1410028802&pickMembers%5B0%5D=1.1&pickMembers%5B1%5D=3.1&cubeTimeFrame.startMonth=12&cubeTimeFrame.startYear=2019&referencePeriods=20191201%2C20191201
Stewart, J., & Maley, M. (2014). The public sector. In A. Fenna, J. Robbins, & J. Summers (Eds.), Government and politics in Australia (10th Ed.). Pearson Australia.
Stone, D. (1993). Think tanks: Independent policy research institutes in the United States, the United Kingdom and Australia (PhD Thesis). Australian National University, Canberra.
Stone, D. (1998). The development and discourse of Australian think tanks. In D. Stone, A. Denham, & M. Garnett (Eds.), Think tanks across nations: A comparative approach. Manchester University Press.
Stone, D. (2000). Non-governmental policy transfer: The strategies of independent policy institutes. Governance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration, 13(1), 45–62.
Stone, D., & Denham, A. (Eds.). (2004). Think tank traditions: Policy research and the politics of ideas. Manchester University Press.
Stone, D., Denham, A., & Garnett, M. (Eds.). (1998). Think tanks across nations: A comparative approach. Manchester University Press.
Summers, J., & Lowe, J. (2014). The federal system. In A. Fenna, J. Robbins, & J. Summers (Eds.), Government and politics in Australia (10th Ed.). Pearson Australia.
t Hart, P., & Vromen, A. (2008). A new era for think tanks in public policy? International trends, Australian realities. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 67(2), 135–148.
Thackrah, A. (2012). “The world is ruled by little else”: Australian neo-liberal think tanks during the Howard years (PhD Thesis). University of Western Australia, Perth.
Vromen, A. (2017). Digital citizenship and political engagement: The challenge from online campaigning and advocacy organisations. Palgrave Macmillan UK.
Whelan, J. (2011). The state of the Australian public service: An alternative report. Centre for Policy Development. https://cpd.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/CPD_OP12_2011_State_of_APS_Whelan.pdf
World Bank. (2019a). GDP (current US$). Retrieved October 29, 2021, from The World Bank. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.CD?locations=AU-CA-GB-US
World Bank. (2019b). Population, total. Retrieved October 29, 2021, from The World Bank. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.POP.TOTL
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hagland, T. (2023). The Evolutionary Path and Comparative Perspectives. In: Think Tanks in Australia. Interest Groups, Advocacy and Democracy Series. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-27044-4_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-27044-4_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-27043-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-27044-4
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)