Abstract
Contemporary universities have many different tasks. Next to the traditional research and teaching mission, universities are also expected to engage in other activities that create social value. A balance between these different tasks varies across higher education systems, institutions, and individuals. This chapter examines the position of international staff on this landscape of different missions. International mobility is usually associated with research excellence. In this chapter we empirically examine the difference between local and international staff to test this image about international staff. The analysis shows that international staff is indeed significantly more oriented towards research and less on teaching, both in their intrinsic interest and time investment. Difference with respect to ‘third mission’ activities is small. International staff is equally or even more active in activities like patenting or creating spin-off companies. On the other hand, they are underrepresented in activities that are embedded in a local context, such as serving on expert committees or undertaking consultancy work. This triggers a question about an optimal engagement of international staff in the diversity of missions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Åkerlund, A. (2020). A competition state perspective on the development of Swedish policies for internationalisation of higher education and research 1960s–2010s. Nordic Journal of Educational History, 7(2), 99–123.
Albert, C., Davia, M. A., & Legazpe, N. (2018). Job satisfaction amongst academics: the role of research productivity. Studies in Higher Education, 43(8), 1362–1377.
Altbach, P., & Yudkevich, M. (2017). The role of international faculty in the mobility era. University World News. https://www.universityworldnews.com/post.php?story=20170125121351466
Amaral, A., & Magalhães, A. (2002). The emergent role of external stakeholders in european higher education governance. In A. Amaral, G. A. Jones, & B. Karseth (Eds.), Governing higher education: national perspectives on institutional governance. Higher education dynamics (Vol. 2, pp. 1–21). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9946-7_1
Anderson, S. (2020). Immigrants, nobel prizes and the American dream. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/stuartanderson/2020/10/14/immigrantsnobel-prizes-and-the-american-dream/?sh=694eb4f4372e
Auriol, L. (2007). Labour market characteristics and international mobility of doctorate holders: results for seven countries. In OECD science, technology, and industry working papers 2007/2. OECD Publishing.
Baker, S. (2019, September 26). Reliance on foreign PhD students ‘could harm US research’ Data show US has relatively low number of domestic PhD graduates, leaving it reliant on potentially fragile international recruitment. THE. https://www.timeshighereducation.com/news/reliance-foreign-phd-students-could-harm-us-research
Barbaric, D. V., & Jones, G. A. (2016). International faculty in Canada: Recruitment and transition processes. In M. Yudkevich, P. G. Altbach, & L. E. Rumbley (Eds.), International faculty in higher education (pp. 51–75). Routledge.
Bauder, H. (2020). International mobility and social capital in the academic field. Minerva, 58(3), 367–387. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-020-09401-w
Beerkens, M. (2019). The European research council and the academic profession: Insights from the starting grant holders. European Political Science, 18(2), 267–274.
Bolhaar, J., Kuijpers, S., & Nibbelink, A. (2019). Economische effecten van internationalisering in het hoger onderwijs en mbo. CPB.
D’Este, P., Tang, P., Mahdi, S., Neely, A., & Sánchez-Barrioluengo, M. (2013). The pursuit of academic excellence and business engagement: is it irreconcilable? Scientometrics, 95, 481–502.
Da Wan, C., & Abdullah, D. (2021). Internationalisation of Malaysian higher education: Policies, practices and the SDGs. International Journal of Comparative Education and Development, 23(3), 212–226.
de Weert, E., & Beerkens, M. (2009). Research at universities of applied sciences in Europe: Conditions, achievements and perspectives. In Report prepared for the European network for universities of applied sciences (UASNET). CHEPS.
De Wit, H., Rumbley, L. E., Craciun, D., Mihut, G., & Woldegiyorgis, A. A. (2019). International mapping of national tertiary education internationalization strategies and plans (NTEISPs) CIHE Perspectives (Vol. 12).
Didou Aupetit, S. (2016). Attraction, integration, and productivity of international academics in Mexico: Comparative perspectives on recruitment, integration, and impact. In M. Yudkevich, P. G. Altbach, & L. E. Rumbley (Eds.), International Faculty in Higher Education: Comparative perspectives on recruitment, integration, and impact (pp. 173–195). Routledge.
Dundar, H., & Lewis, D. R. (1998). Determinants of research productivity in higher edu-cation. Research in Higher Education, 39, 607–663.
Enders, J., & Teichler, U. (2005). Academics’ view of teaching staff mobility: The ERASMUS experience revisited. In A. Welch (Ed.), The professoriate (pp. 97–112). Springer.
ETER. (2019). Internationalisation of academic staff in european higher education european tertiary education register. The ETER project, 2019. https://www.joanneum.at/fileadmin/user_upload/ETER_AnalyticalReport_01_final.pdf
Gacel-Avila, J. (2018). Internationalization of higher education in Mexico: Progress and challenges. Mapping internationalization globally. International briefs for higher education leaders no. 7. American Council on Education.
Ghasemy, M., Derahvasht, A., & Castillo Apraiz, J. (2021). Antecedents and consequences of wandering scholars' affect: the case of multi-cultural Malaysia in the internationalization era. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-02-2021-0078
Graf, H., & Kalthaus, M. (2018). International research networks: Determinants of country embeddedness. Research Policy, 47(7), 1198–1214.
Hesli, V., & Lee, J. (2011). Faculty research productivity: Why do some of our colleagues publish more than others? Political Science & Politics, 44(2), 393–408.
Horta, H. (2013). Deepening our understanding of academic inbreeding effects on research information exchange and scientific output: new insights for academic based research. Higher Education, 65, 487–510. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-012-9559-7
Jonkers, K., & Cruz-Castro, L. (2013). Research upon return: The effect of international mobility on scientific ties, production and impact. Research Policy, 42(8), 1366–1377.
Khattab, N., & Fenton, S. (2016). Globalisation of researcher mobility within the UK Higher Education: Explaining the presence of overseas academics in the UK academia. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 14(4), 528–542.
Laredo, P. (2007). Revisiting the third mission of universities: Toward a renewed categorization of university activities? Higher Education Policy, 20, 441–456.
Lee, J. T., & Kuzhabekova, A. (2018). Reverse flow in academic mobility from core to periphery: Motivations of international faculty working in Kazakhstan. Higher Education, 76(2), 369–386.
Leung, K. (2007). The glory and tyranny of citation impact: An East Asian perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 50(3), 510–513. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2007.25525592
Mägi, E., & Beerkens, M. (2016). Linking research and teaching: Are research active staff members different teachers? Higher Education, 72(2), 241–258.
Marginson, S. (2006). Dynamics of national and global competition in higher education. Higher Education, 52(1), 1–39.
Marginson, S., & van der Wende, M. (2007). Globalisation and higher education. OECD working paper.
Marsh, H. W., & Hattie, J. (2002). The relation between research productivity and teaching effectiveness. The Journal of Higher Education, 73(5), 603–641.
Netz, N., Hampel, S., & Aman, V. (2020). What effects does international mobility have on scientists’ careers?. A systematic review. Research Evaluation, 29(3), 327–351.
OECD. (2017). OECD science, technology and industry scoreboard 2017: The digital transformation. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264268821-en
Rose, A. L., & Leišyte, L. (2016). Integrating international academic staff into the local academic context in Lithuania and Estonia. In M. Yudkeich, P. G. Altbach, & L. E. Rumbley (Eds.), International faculty in higher education (pp. 101–123). Routledge.
Rovito, S. M., Kaushik, D., & Aggarwal, S. D. (2021). The impact of international scientists, engineers, and students on U.S. research outputs and global competitiveness. MIT Science Policy Review, 2, 15–25.
Sautier, M. (2021). Move or perish? Sticky mobilities in the Swiss academic context. Higher Education, 82, 799–822. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-021-00722-7
Schiller, D., & Cordes, A. (2016). Measuring researcher mobility: A Comparison of different datasets and methods with an empirical application of micro-data for the United States and Germany. Paper presented in the OECD Blue Sky Forum 2016. https://www.oecd.org/sti/062%20-%20Schiller-Cordes-Researcher-Mobility-final.pdf
Schimank, U., & Winnes, M. (2000). Beyond Humboldt? The relationship between teaching and research in European university systems. Science & Public Policy, 27(6), 397–408.
Schneijderberg, C., Götze, N., Jones, G. A., Bilyalov, D., Panova, A., Karram Stephenson, G., & Yudkevich, M. (2021). Does vertical university stratification foster or hinder academics’ societal engagement? findings from Canada, Germany, Kazakhstan, and Russia. Higher Education Policy, 34, 66–87.
Siekkinen, T., Pekkola, E., & Kivistö, J. (2016). Recruitments in Finnish universities: practicing strategic or pathetic HRM? Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 2-3, 32316.
Stephenson, G. K. (2018). The State of Internationalization in Canada: Strategic and Innovative. International Briefs for Higher Education Leaders, 7, 9–11.
Teichler, U. (2007). Higher education systems. Conceptual frameworks, comparative perspectives, empirical findings. Sense.
Teichler, U. (2008). Diversification? Trends and explanations of the shape and size of higher education. Higher Education, 56, 349–379.
UNESCO. (n.d.). Education statistics. [Database]. http://data.uis.unesco.org/
Välimaa, J., & Weimer, L. (2014). The trends of internationalization in Finnish higher education. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 60(5), 696–709.
van Vught, F. (2008). Mission diversity and reputation in higher education. Higher Education Policy, 21, 151–174.
Veiga, A., Rosa, M. J., & Amaral, A. (2007). The internationalisation of Portuguese Higher Education: How are higher education institutions facing this new challenge? Higher Education Management and Policy, 18(1), 105–120.
Funding Acknowledgement
Anna Panova was financially supported by HSE University Basic Research Program.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Beerkens, M., Panova, A., Vasari, P. (2023). International Staff and Diversity in Missions. In: Çalıkoğlu, A., Jones, G.A., Kim, Y. (eds) Internationalization and the Academic Profession. The Changing Academy – The Changing Academic Profession in International Comparative Perspective, vol 24. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-26995-0_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-26995-0_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-26994-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-26995-0
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)