Skip to main content

Introduction to Infinite Injury

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Algorithms for Constructing Computably Enumerable Sets

Part of the book series: Computer Science Foundations and Applied Logic ((CSFAL))

  • 166 Accesses

Abstract

Coping with infinite injury is a subtle and beautiful topic. The reader should study this short introductory chapter now, and then again after studying Chap. 11.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In the proof of the Friedberg-Muchnik Theorem, we did not label our requirements as P for positive and N for negative. Rather, each requirement, say \(R_{2e} : A\ne \Phi _e^B\), was both positive and negative. That is, \(R_{2e}\) sometimes needed to force a witness into A, and sometimes needed to keep small elements out of B. That’s why we used the neutral label R.

    In the proof of the Sacks Splitting Theorem, requirement \(R_{e, i}\) certainly was negative. It could also be viewed as positive in the sense that it might put certain elements into \(B_{1-i}\) (but for the sole purpose of keeping them out of \(B_i\)).

  2. 2.

    This is true for the first generation of priority tree arguments, sometimes called “double-jump” arguments. For the next generation, the daunting “triple-jump” arguments (which are not treated in this book), the relationship between level e and the requirements \(P_e\) and \(N_e\) can be more complicated.

  3. 3.

    Arguably, it traces back to 1954 [De]. True stages are not only an algorithmic alternative to priority trees; in [CGS], for example, the concept of true stages is used in the proof of correctness of a complicated priority tree algorithm. Various generalizations of true stages are presented in [Mo].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Supowit, K.J. (2023). Introduction to Infinite Injury. In: Algorithms for Constructing Computably Enumerable Sets. Computer Science Foundations and Applied Logic. Birkhäuser, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-26904-2_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-26904-2_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Birkhäuser, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-26903-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-26904-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics