Skip to main content

From Life to Law: Towards an Evolving Conception of Ecocide

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Rearguard of Subjectivity

Abstract

Our contemporary world gives agency to Law as the source of determining right and wrong. With a global history of increasingly, seemingly justifiable human destruction of the natural environment for political and economic cause, Law is empowered to step in and declare ‘no more’. At the level of courts and national governments, Law is a higher figure, compelling action on a global scale to label and adjudicate acts of ecocide. Yet, even Law must reflect on its role as accomplice or objector to the ongoing realities of manmade environment calamity and destruction.

The rules of our world are laws, and they can be changed.

Laws can restrict or they can enable.

What matters is what they serve. https://twitter.com/EcocideLaw/status/1384802479678894080/photo/1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Deleuze and Guattari (1987).

  2. 2.

    Deleuze and Guattari (1987), p. 18.

  3. 3.

    Deleuze and Guattari (1987), p. 42.

  4. 4.

    Deleuze and Guattari (1987), p. 71.

  5. 5.

    Kevelson (2015), p. 215.

  6. 6.

    Mootz (2011), pp. 5–20.

  7. 7.

    Broekman (2010), p. 58.

  8. 8.

    Deleuze and Guattari (1987), p. 121.

  9. 9.

    https://www.larousse.fr/dictionnaires/francais/écocide/186327. Accessed on 7 July 2021.

  10. 10.

    Entry “Ecocide” in https://dictionary.cambridge.org/fr/dictionnaire/anglais/ecocide. Accessed on 7 July 2021.

  11. 11.

    Entry “The Holocaust and the Environmental Crisis” in Taylor (2006).

  12. 12.

    Citation of Peirce quoted in Broekman (2011), p. 3.

  13. 13.

    Weisberg (1970), p. 8.

  14. 14.

    Zierler (2011).

  15. 15.

    Cook et al. (1970), p. 94.

  16. 16.

    Weisberg (1970), p. 19.

  17. 17.

    Weisberg (1970), p. 20.

  18. 18.

    https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/applic/ihl/ihl.nsf/ART/470-750044?OpenDocument. Accessed on 14 July 2021.

  19. 19.

    https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/applic/ihl/ihl.nsf/ART/470-750070?OpenDocument. Accessed on 14 July 2021.

  20. 20.

    Peluso and Vandergeest (2011), pp. 252–284.

  21. 21.

    United Nations Security Council Resolution 687. 3 April 1991: http://unscr.com/en/resolutions/doc/687: 14. Accessed on 10 June 2021.

  22. 22.

    Entry “Environment and Security” in Denemark and Marlin-Bennett (2017).

  23. 23.

    https://www.theguardian.com/environment/damian-carrington-blog/2011/sep/29/ecocide-oil-criminal-court. Accessed 10 June 2021.

  24. 24.

    Gauger et al. (2012).

  25. 25.

    Higgins et al. (2013), p. 262.

  26. 26.

    Falk (1971), p. 20.

  27. 27.

    Neyret (2015), p. 338.

  28. 28.

    Deleuze (1997), p. 83.

  29. 29.

    Broekman and Fleerackers (2018).

  30. 30.

    https://www.conventioncitoyennepourleclimat.fr. Accessed 19 June 2021.

  31. 31.

    Convention citoyenne pour le climat. (10 April 2020) https://www.conventioncitoyennepourleclimat.fr/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/Contribution-de-la-CCC-au-plan-de-sortie-de-crise-1.pdf: 144–148. Accessed 20 June 2021.

  32. 32.

    https://www.stockholmresilience.org/research/planetary-boundaries/the-nine-planetary-boundaries.html. Accessed 20 June 2021.

  33. 33.

    Convention citoyenne pour le climat. (10 April 2020) https://www.conventioncitoyennepourleclimat.fr/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/Contribution-de-la-CCC-au-plan-de-sortie-de-crise-1.pdf: proposition SN7.1: 145. Accessed 20 June 2021.

  34. 34.

    Enault and Ceaux (21 November 2020).

  35. 35.

    See art. 68 Loi Climat et Résilience to be published soon on the official French website.

  36. 36.

    https://www.stopecocide.earth/expert-drafting-panel. Accessed on 25 June 2021.

  37. 37.

    https://www.stopecocide.earth/press-releases-summary/top-international-lawyers-unveil-definition-of-ecocide. Accessed on 25 June 2021.

  38. 38.

    Schwartz (2019).

  39. 39.

    Wolfe (2020).

  40. 40.

    Jones (2012, 2017).

  41. 41.

    Bonneuil and Fressoz (2017), p. 291.

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Wagner, A., Marusek, S. (2023). From Life to Law: Towards an Evolving Conception of Ecocide. In: Fleerackers, F. (eds) The Rearguard of Subjectivity. Law and Visual Jurisprudence, vol 9. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-26855-7_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-26855-7_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-26854-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-26855-7

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics