Skip to main content

Polarization, Depolarization, and (Re)polarization: The 2019 Electoral Process and a New Alternation in Argentine Democracy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Latin America’s Pendular Politics

Part of the book series: Studies of the Americas ((STAM))

  • 152 Accesses

Abstract

The victory of Alberto Fernández in the presidential elections inaugurated the fifth cycle of political alternation in Argentina since the transition to democracy in 1983. While the 2015 elections were marked by the unprecedented arrival in power of a centre-right political force, four years later, and for the first time in thirty-six years of democratic stability, an incumbent president failed his re-election project and a non-Peronist force had to give up power.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The Argentine case also differed from other countries in the region such as Ecuador, Chile, Bolivia and Colombia, which were marked by important cycles of public mobilization (Llanos and Maia, 2019; Murillo, 2021).

  2. 2.

    We do not forget López Obrador’s victory in Mexico in 2018. However, the historical cycle in this country was different from the regional tendency as Mexico was not part of the cases included in the so-called “left turn”.

  3. 3.

    Only for the examination of the degree of alternation and its temporality. For the study of the ideological dimension, the analysis will focus on presidential elections.

  4. 4.

    Our database is composed of the Manifesto Project’s analysis of electoral platforms and an audio-visual corpus of the electoral campaign.

  5. 5.

    According to the indicators presented in the introduction of this collective work.

  6. 6.

    A description of the Argentine political regime is presented in the web site the OPALC attached to this work.

  7. 7.

    Other institutional factors have also to be taken into account, such as the type of electoral system.

  8. 8.

    In 2015 presidential elections and the 2017 legislative elections, the electoral front led by President Macri “Cambiemos included PRO, the Civic Coalition and the Radical Civic Union.

  9. 9.

    Under the hegemony of Kirchnerism, the Peronism lost in the 2009 and 2013 (mid-term elections) and in the 2015 (presidential elections).

  10. 10.

    Macri’s positive image stood at 52, 8% in the fourth quarter of 2017 (Rouvier & Asociados, April 2019).

  11. 11.

    To a detail of a fiscal deficit evolution, see Graphic 1 on the Appendix (OPALC Web Site).

  12. 12.

    The agreement was the largest loan in the IMF's history, amounting to $57.1 billion.

  13. 13.

    To a detail of GDP evolution, see Graphic 2 on the Appendix (OPALC Web Site).

  14. 14.

    To a detail of the augmentation of poverty and indigence, see graphic 3 on the Appendix (OPALC Web Site).

  15. 15.

    National Poll, 1.844 cases, Pollster Circuitos, Clarín, April 2019.

  16. 16.

    Rouvier &. Asociados, national report, April 2019, p. 5.

  17. 17.

    CFK had 33.4% of voting intentions in April, ahead of Mauricio Macri who had 24.9% (Rouvier &. Asociados, national report, April 2019).

  18. 18.

    The phrase belongs to Alberto Fernández (source: Perfil, 7/2/2018).

  19. 19.

    CFK had an important and consolidated negative image that was always above 50% between the end of her mandate, where it reached 57.2%, and April 2019, where it reached 57% (Rouvier & Asociados, National Newsletter, April 2019).

  20. 20.

    This division was public presented as a “rift” that recovers and re-signifies the game of founding oppositions of the Argentine political regime, principally the decisive antagonism between Peronism and anti-Peronism. Without reaching the extremes of other eras, Argentina's political space was structured around two opposing sides in a battleground in which intolerance nullified any possibility of coexistence and plural expression. This strategy of power was used by Kirchnerism and Macrism to create intense minorities of loyal supporters limiting their hegemonic capacity.

  21. 21.

    Infobae, 28/6/2018.

  22. 22.

    Le Monde Diplomatique, June 2018.

  23. 23.

    Mainly the two currents of the Central de los Trabajadores Argentinos (CTA) and the Confederación General de Trabajo (CGT).

  24. 24.

    At the national level, this front brings together the Propuesta Republicana (PRO), the Unión Cívica Radical (UCR), the Coalición Cívica and local parties’ representations.

  25. 25.

    Source selection of public speeches, Audio-visual Corpus, Electoral Campaign, 2019. A detail of the Corpus composition is presented on the Appendix (OPALC Web Site).

  26. 26.

    Electoral Program, FdT, p. 3.

  27. 27.

    To detail of P.A.S.O results see Table 1 on the Appendix (Web site OPALC).

  28. 28.

    A detail of the results of this electoral cycle is presented on the Appendix Graphic 4 (OPALC Web Site).

  29. 29.

    For a detail, see map 1 on the Appendix (OPALC Web Site).

  30. 30.

    For a detail of the vote of FdT and JC in the difference province, see Table 2 in the Annexes.

  31. 31.

    The Province of Buenos Aires has 13,185,036 voters, 37% of the total number of eligible voters nationwide.

  32. 32.

    In the first four provinces, we can find the most dynamic and socio-economically rich agricultural areas.

  33. 33.

    Without claiming to be exhaustive, we can illustrate this by considering that in the municipalities with this voter profile, for example, in the City of Buenos Aires (municipalities 13, 14 and 6) and in the “Conurbano Bonaerense” (municipalities of San Isidro and Vicente López) the formula presided over by Fernández obtained 81,169 more votes than the Frente para la Victoria (FPV) achieved in the 2015 presidential elections. Source: Table 3 (Appendix OPALC Web Site).

  34. 34.

    Being greater than 3 according to the indicators presented in the introduction to this collective work.

References

  • Antenucci Pedro y Page María. (2019). “Otra mirada de la elección presidencial 2019”, Documentos CIPPEC-OEAR, N°11, p. 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calvo, E. and Murillo, V. (2004). “Who Delivers? Partisan Clients in the Argentine Labor Market”, American Journal of Political Science, 48 (4), 742–757.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casullo, M.E. (2019). El eterno retorno…del peronismo Revista Nueva Sociedad, 10, 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitsky, S. and Roberts, K. (2011). The Resurgence of the Latin American Left, John Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Llanos, M. and Maia, J. (2019). Argentina 2019: Broken Economy Strengthened Democracy GIGA Focus, Latin America, 6, 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murillo, V. (2021). Protestas, descontento y democracia en América Latina, Revista Nueva Sociedad, 294, 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sendra, M. (2020). “Elecciones 2019 en argentina: ¿hacia un bipartidismo de coaliciones entre peronismo y anti-peronismo?” in América latina vota (2017–2019), Manuel Alcántara (Dir.), Editorial Tecnos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vommaro, G. (2017). La larga marcha de Cambiemos. La construcción silenciosa de un proyecto de poder, Editorial Prometeo.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Darío Rodríguez .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Rodríguez, D. (2023). Polarization, Depolarization, and (Re)polarization: The 2019 Electoral Process and a New Alternation in Argentine Democracy. In: Dabène, O. (eds) Latin America’s Pendular Politics. Studies of the Americas. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-26761-1_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics