Skip to main content

Brazil 2016–2018: A Double Political Alternation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Latin America’s Pendular Politics

Part of the book series: Studies of the Americas ((STAM))

Abstract

This chapter analyses the conditions of the double alternation that marked Brazil between 2016 and 2018, a period that starts with the opening of the impeachment proceedings of D. Rousseff in December 2015 and ends with the accession to power of Jair Bolsonaro in January 2019.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    This decision was clearly an act of retaliation: a few hours before, the deputies of the PT group in the Chamber of Deputies had decided to support the opening of a procedure against Eduardo Cunha, in order to have his mandate overturned. Cunha had already broken with the government and joined the opposition on July 17, 2015, one day after being implicated in the Lava Jato case.

  2. 2.

    This distinction refers to the two sources of legitimacy enunciated by the political scientist Fritz Scharpf: input legitimacy and output legitimacy (Scharpf 1999).

  3. 3.

    Deutsche Welle, 2016/09/05, “Em um ano, apoio à democracia no Brasil cai de 54% para 32%”.

  4. 4.

    Latinobarómetro, Report 2018: www.latinobarometro.org/lat.jsp.

  5. 5.

    Support for democracy refers to the share of respondents who consider democracy preferable to any other form of government. The index of satisfaction with democracy measures the share of respondents who say they are satisfied with the way democracy works. The difference between the two reveals the share of “dissatisfied democrats”.

  6. 6.

    In 2020, according to a Datafolha survey, the evangelical faithful represented 31% of the population, or 64 million people. In 2000, according to the IBGE census, they represented 15% of the population. The number of evangelicals increased by 61% between 2000 and 2010. In 2010, 60% of evangelicals were affiliated with Pentecostal churches (IBGE, 2010 Census).

  7. 7.

    It is important to specify that many of the believers are aware of the attempts of instrumentalization to which they are subjected.

References

  • Albuquerque, Afonso de. 2021. “The Two Sources of the Illiberal Turn in Brazil”. Brown Journal of World Affairs 27 (2) (Spring/Summer): 127–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alencar, Gedeon Freire de. 2020. “Jair Messias Bolsonaro: o “eleito” de Deus?”. Revista Brasileira de História das Religiões 13 (37).

    Google Scholar 

  • Almeida, Ronaldo de. 2017. “A onda quebrada - evangélicos e conservadorismo”. Cadernos Pagu, n° 50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Almeida, Ronaldo de. 2019. “Bolsonaro presidente: conservadorismo, evangeliso e a crise brasileira”. Novos estudos CEBRAP 38 (May): 185–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bankowicz. Marek. 2012. Coup d’État: A Critical Theoretical Synthesis. Frankfort: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barreto Lisboa, Wladimir, and Paulo Baptista Caruso Macdonald. 2019. “Brésil: l’élection de Jair Bolsonaro ou le pacte des élites avec l’extrême droite”. Cités 2 (78): 187–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bringel, Breno. 2016. “The Long June: The 2013 Mobilizations and the Future of Social Movements in Brazil”. In Simin Fadaee (ed). Understanding Southern Social Movements. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 153–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bringel, Breno, and Geoffrey Pleyers. 2019. “June 2013, Five Years Later: Polarization, Reconfiguration of Activism, and Challenges for the Brazilian Left”. In Vladimir Puzone and Luis Felipe Miguel (eds). The Brazilian Left in the 21st Century. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 237–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burity, Joanildo. 2020. “El pueblo evangélico. Construcción hegemónica, disputas minoritarias y reaccion conservadora”. Encartes 3 (6): 1–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burity, Joanildo. 2021. “The Brazilian Conservative Wave, the Bolsonaro Administration, and Religious Actors”. Brazilian Political Science Review 15 (3).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chirio, Maud. 2018. “Le rôle des militaires dans la déstabilisation de la démocratie brésilienne (2015–2018)”. Brésil(s). Sciences humaines et sociales 1: 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chirio, Maud, and Noûs Camille. 2020. “La victoire de Bolsonaro à la lumière de l’histoire brésilienne”. Sens Public: 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunha, Magali do Nascimento. 2020. “Religião e política no Brasil nas primeiras décadas dos anos 2000: o protagonismo dos evangélicos”. Fronteiras - Revista de Teologia da Unicap 3 (1): 40–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, Ariel Alejandro. 2019. “The New Far-Right in Brazil and the Construction of a Right-Wing Order”. Latin American Perspectives 46 (4): 245–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, Wendy, and Timothy Power. 2019. “Bolsonaro and Brazil's Illiberal Backlash”. Journal of Democracy 30 (1): 68–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Louault, Frédéric. 2022. “Populism and Authoritarian Drift: The Presidency of Jair Bolsonaro in Brazil”. In Alain Dieckhoff, Christophe Jaffrelot and Élise Massicard (eds). Contemporary Populists in Power. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Machado, Maria das Dores Campos. 2012. “Aborto e ativismo religioso nas eleições de 2010”. Revista Brasileira de Ciência Política, avril, 25–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mariano, Ricardo, and Dirceu André Gerardi. 2019. “Eleições presidenciais na América Latina em 2018 e ativismo político de evangélicos conservadores”. Revista USP, n° 120j, 61–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perez-Liñan, Aníbal. 2028. “Impeachment or Backsliding? Threats to Democracy in the Twenty-First Century”. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais 33 (98) [online].

    Google Scholar 

  • Quadros, Marcos Paulo dos Reis, and Rafael Machado Madeira. 2018. “Fim da direita envergonhada? Atuação da bancada evangélica e da bancada da bala e os caminhos da representação do conservadorismo no Brasil”. Opinião Pública 24 (3): 486–522.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rouquié, A. (2006). Le Brésil au 21e siècle. Naissance d'un nouveau grand. Paris: Fayard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharpf, Fritz. 1999. Governing in Europe. Effective and Democratic? Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spyer, Juliano. 2020. Povo de Deus: quem são os evangélicos e por que eles importam. 1a̲ edição. Rio de Janeiro: Geração.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Margaux De Barros .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

De Barros, M., Kermoal, K., Louault, F. (2023). Brazil 2016–2018: A Double Political Alternation. In: Dabène, O. (eds) Latin America’s Pendular Politics. Studies of the Americas. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-26761-1_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics