Skip to main content

Artificial Intelligence Techniques for Predicting Water Quality Parameters and Management in a Complex River System: A Review

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Sustainability Challenges and Delivering Practical Engineering Solutions

Part of the book series: Advances in Science, Technology & Innovation ((ASTI))

  • 208 Accesses

Abstract

Evaluation of the water quality in the rivers is necessary to enhance the health of humans and ecosystems, but it quite difficult and requires more time and effort due to many parameters affected. Although, the Ringlet River considered the more important rivers in the Cameron Highland, probably it is the most badly affected river with records of incidences where permissible levels of certain parameters such as suspended solids, agrochemicals, and sewage have been contravened and drinking water. Recently, the tourism, agriculture, and industry in that region dramatically increased. This parameter leads to increase the pollution rate in the water of the four rivers that flow into the lake, which changes the quality of the water to the worse level. The nature of the muddy area is a parameter that allows soil erosion on the banks of the rivers especially at the time of floods. Due to these parameters, the dam loses the goal of hydroelectric construction benefit, in addition to protect catchment areas from floods, recently this dam become less useful due to the accumulated amount of mud increasing steadily, therefore, the annual removing mud sediments from the Ringlet reservoir is difficult and expensive. The aim of the study is to find logical, feasible, and economic solutions to mitigate the damage and treat it in the future. The study is concerned to estimate, evaluate, predict, and solve the problems of the Ringlet River and Ringlet reservoir which are located in the north of Malaysia. Numerous intelligent models have been developed to accurately predict and evaluate the quality of the surface water by using conventional methods that may be ineffective, inaccurate, and relatively slow in predicting results. Therefore, the use of artificial intelligence (AI) technology was resorted to predict water quality and sediment volume in the Ringlet Basin to assess its applicability of water quality. ANN method is selected as a statistical method applied to develop an interpretability model for decision-maker. A methodology has been scheduled to include the Ringlet river and Ringlet catchment reservoir. There are many parameters affected the pollution of the Ringlet reservoir such as urban activities, seasonal effects (flood and climate), animal’s wastes, agricultural residues, and `soil properties that may cause the erosion of the specified area.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • S. Abbas, B. Khudair, M. Jaafar, River water salinity impact on drinking water treatment plant performance using artificial neural network. J. Eng. 25(8), 149–159 (2019). https://doi.org/10.31026/j.eng.2019.08.10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A. Adib, A. Mahmoodi, Prediction of suspended sediment load using ANN GA conjunction model with Markov chain approach at flood conditions. KSCE J. Civ. Eng. 21(1), 447–457 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-016-0444-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J.T. Adu, M.V. Kumarasamy, Development of non-point source hybrid cells in series model for reactive pollutant transport in natural rivers. Polish J. Environ. Stud. 29(5), 3031–3039, 9p (2020). https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes/109025

  • M. Al-Mukhtar, F. Al-Yaseen, Modeling water quality parameters using data-driven models, a case study Abu-Ziriq Marsh in South of Iraq. Hydrology 6(1), 24 (2019). https://www.mdpi.com/2306-5338/6/1/24#cite

  • M. Alp, H.K. Cigizoglu, Suspended sediment load simulation by two artificial neural network methods using hydrometeorological data. Environ. Model. Softw. 22, 2–13 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2005.09.009

  • A.D. Astuti, A. Aris, M.R. Salim, S. Azman, S. Salmiati, M.I.M. Said, Artificial intelligence approach to predicting river water quality: a review. J. Environ. Treatment Tech. 8(3), 1093–1100 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Banjad, M. Kamali, K. Amir Moradi, E. Aliai, Forecasting some of the qualitative parameters of rivers using wavelet artificial neural network hybrid (W-ANN) model) (case of study: Jajroud River of Tehran and Gharaso River of Kermanshah). Iran. J. Health Environ. 6(3), 277–294, 18 (Language: Persian)

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Baseri, M. Belali-Owsia, A novel hybrid ICA-ANFIS model for prediction of manufacturing processes performance. Proc. IMechE Part E: J. Process Mech. Eng. 231(2), 181–190 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1177/0954408915585256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ö. BaydaroÄŸlu, K. Koçak, K. Duran, River flow prediction using hybrid models of support vector regression with the wavelet transform, singular spectrum analysis and chaotic approach. Meteorol. Atmos. Phys. 130(3), 349–359, 11 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00703-017-0518-9

  • K.W. Chau, An ontology-based knowledge management system for flow and water quality modeling. Adv. Eng. Softw. 38(3), 172–181 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2006.07.003. ISSN 0965-9978

  • Y. Chen, X. Fang, L. Yang, Y. Liu, C. Gong, Y. Di, Artificial neural networks in the prediction and assessment for water quality: a review. J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 1237(4) (2019). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1237/4/042051

  • J. Dalle, M.Z. Elfirman, M. Sufyan, Microcontroller based water measurement level prototype using fuzzy logic method. TEM J. 9(2), 694–701, 8p. https://doi.org/10.18421/tem92-36

  • M.E. Faridah Othman, M.S. Alaaeldin, A.N. Ahmed, F.Y. Teo, C.M. Fai, H.A. Afan, M. Sherif, A. Sefelnasr, A. El-Shafie, Efficient river water quality index prediction considering minimal number of inputs variables. Eng. Appl. Comput. Fluid Mech. 14(1), 751–763 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/19942060.2020.1760942

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M.B. Gasim, S. Surif, M.E. Toriman, S.A. Rahim, R. Elfithri, P.I. Lun, Land-use change and climate-change patterns of the Cameron highlands, Pahang, Malaysia. Arab World Geogr. 12(1–2), 51–61 (2009). https://doi.org/10.5555/arwg.12.1-2.l2p14j2833g2q4l7

  • L. Godo-Pla, J.J. Rodríguez, J. Suquet, P. Emiliano, F. Valero, M. Poch, H. Monclús, Control of primary disinfection in a drinking water treatment plant based on a fuzzy inference system. Process Saf. Environ. Protect.: Trans. Inst. Chem. Eng. Part B. 145, 63–70, 8p (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2020.07.037

  • A.K. Gupta, P. Kumar, R.K. Sahoo, A.K. Sahu, S.K. Sarangi, Performance measurement of plate fin heat exchanger by exploration: ANN, ANFIS, GA, and SA. J. Com. Des. Eng. 4(1), 60–68 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcde.2016.07.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • G. Hayder, I. Kurniawan, H. Mustafa, Implementation of machine learning methods for monitoring and predicting water quality parameters. Biointerface Res. Appl. Chem. 11, 9285–9295 (2020). https://doi.org/10.33263/BRIAC112.92859295

  • G. Hayder, I. Kurniawan, H.M. Mustafa, Implementation of machine learning methods for monitoring and predicting water quality parameters. Biointerface Res. Appl. Chem. 11(2), 9285–9295 (2021). ISSN 2069-5837

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Huang, D. Tian, H. Liu, C. Zhang, X. Yi, J. Cai, J. Ruan, T. Zhang, S. Kong, G. Ying, A hybrid fuzzy wavelet neural network model with self-adapted fuzzy-means clustering and genetic algorithm for water quality prediction in rivers. Complexity 2018, Article ID 8241342, 11 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/8241342

  • O. Jaafar, M.E. Toriman, S.A. Sharifah Mastura, M.B. Gazim, P.I. Lun, P. Abdullah, M.K.A. Kamarudin, N.A.A. Aziz, Modeling the impacts of ringlet reservoir on downstream hydraulic capacity of Bertam River using XPSWMM in Cameron highlands, Malaysia. Res. J. Appl. Sci. 5, 47–53 (2010). https://doi.org/10.3923/rjasci.2010.47.53. https://medwelljournals.com/abstract/?doi=rjasci.2010.47.53

  • J.S. Jang, ANFIS: adaptive-network-based fuzzy inference system. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 23(3), 665–685 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1109/21.256541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A. Karkevandi-Talkhooncheh, S. Hajirezaie, A. Hemmati-Sarapardeh, M.M. Husein, K. Karan, M. Sharifi, Application of adaptive neuro fuzzy interface system optimized with evolutionary algorithms for modeling CO2-crude oil minimum miscibility pressure. Fuel 205, 34–45 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2017.05.026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • W.M.A.W.M. Khalik, M.P. Abdullah, N. Padli, N.A. Amerudin, Assessment on nutrient status in water and sediment quality of Bertam River, Cameron Highlands. Int. J. Chem. Sci. 11(2), 709–720 (2013). ISSN 0972-768X

    Google Scholar 

  • Y. Li, R.R. Gu, Modeling flow and sediment transport in a river system using an artificial neural network. Environ. Manage. 31(1), 122–134 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-002-2862-9

  • D.P. Loucks, E. van Beek, in Project Planning: Putting It All Together. Water Resource Systems Planning and Management (Springer, Cham, 2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44234-1_13

  • J. Luis, L.M. Sidek, M.N.B.M. Desa, P.Y. Julien, in Challenge in running hydropower as source of clean energy: ringlet reservoir, Cameron highlands case study. Proceedings National Graduate Conference 2012 (NatGrad2012), Universiti Tenaga Nasional, Putrajaya Campus, 8–10 Nov 2012

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Mateo Sagasta (IWMI), S.M. Zadeh (FAO) and H. Turral with contributions from J. Burke (formerly FAO), Water pollution from agriculture: a global review. Published by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Rome, 2017 and the International Water Management Institute on behalf of the Water Land and Ecosystems research program Colombo, 2017. www.fao.org/contact-us/licencerequest. copyright@fao.org. FAO information products are available on the FAO website (www.fao.org/publications) and can be purchased through publications-sales@fao.org© (FAO and IWMI, 2017). Cover photograph: © Jim Holmes/IWMI

  • B. Mohamed Khalil, A. Georges Awadallah, H. Karaman, A. El-Sayed, Application of artificial neural networks for the prediction of water quality variables in the Nile Delta. J. Water Resour. Protect. 4(6), 388–394 (2012). https://doi.org/10.4236/jwarp.2012.46044

  • A. Mukerji, C. Chatterjee, N.S. Raghuwanshi, Flood forecasting using ANN, neuro-fuzzy, and neuro-GA models. J. Hydrol. Eng. 14(6), 647–652. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000040

  • H.M. Nagy, K. Watanabe, M. Hirano, Prediction of sediment load concentration in rivers using artificial neural network model. J. Hydraul. Eng. 128(6), 588–595 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2002)128:6(588). ISSN 0733-9429

  • A. Najah, A. El-Shafie, O.A. Karim et al., Application of artificial neural networks for water quality prediction. Neural Comput. Appl. 22, 187–201 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-012-0940-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • N. Noori, L. Kalin, S. Isik, Water quality prediction using SWAT-ANN coupled approach. J. Hydrol. 590, 125220 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. O’Keefe, K. Walker, Large river ecosystems: a dedication to Bryan Davies. Special Issue 35(5) (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Orouji, O. Bozorg Haddad, E. Fallah-Mehdipour, M.A. Mariño, Modeling of water quality parameters using data-driven model. J. Environ. Eng. 139(7) (2013). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0000706

  • J. Park, K.T. Kim, W.H. Lee, Recent advances in information and communications technology (ICT) and sensor technology for monitoring water quality. Water 12(2), 510 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/w12020510

  • K.S. Parmar, S.J.S. Makkhan, S. Kaushal, Neuro-fuzzy-wavelet hybrid approach to estimate the future trends of river water quality. Neural Comput. Appl. 31(12), 8463–8473, 11 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-019-04560-8

  • M. Rezakazemi, A. Dashti, M. Asghari, S. Shirazian, H2-selective mixed matrix membranes modeling using ANFIS, PSO-ANFIS, GA ANFIS. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 42(22), 15211–15225 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.04.044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • H. Riahi-Madvar, S.A. Ayyoubzadeh, M.G. Atani, Developing an expert system for predicting alluvial channel geometry using ANN. Expert Syst. Appl. 38(1), 215–222 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2010.06.047

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A. Sarkar, P. Pandey, River water quality modelling using artificial neural network technique. Aquat. Proc. 4, 1070–1077 (2015). ISSN 2214-241X. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aqpro.2015.02.135

  • A. Sarkheyli, A.M. Zain, S. Sharif, Robust optimization of ANFIS based on a new modified GA. Neurocomputing 166, 357–366 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2015.03.060

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. Shahlaei, A. Madadkar-Sobhani, L. Saghaie, A. Fassihi, Application of an expert system based on genetic algorithm–adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (GA–ANFIS) in QSAR of cathepsin K inhibitors. Expert Syst. Appl. 39(6), 6182–6191 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.11.106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. Sibtain, X. Li, M.I. Azam, H. Bashir, Applicability of a three-stage hybrid model by employing a two-stage signal decomposition approach and a deep learning methodology for runoff forecasting at Swat River Catchment, Pakistan. Polish J. Environ. Stud. 30(1), 369–384, 16 (2021). https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes/120773

  • K.P. Singh, A. Malik, D. Mohan, S. Sinha, Multivariate statistical techniques for the evaluation of spatial and temporal variations in water quality of Gomti River (India)—a case study. Water Res. 38(18), 3980–3992 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2004.06.011. ISSN 0043-1354. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0043135404003367

  • A.P. Singh, R. Srinivas, S. Kumar, S. Chakrabarti, Water quality assessment of a River Basin under fuzzy multi-criteria framework. Int. J. Water. 9 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1504/IJW.2015.070364

  • A. Sönmez, S. Kale, R.C. Ozdemir, A. Kadak, An adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) to predict of cadmium (Cd) concentrations in the Filyos River, Turkey. Turk. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 18, 1333–1343 (2018). https://doi.org/10.4194/1303-2712-v18_12_01

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • K.W. Tan, M.B. Mokhtar, Evaluation of social perception on water issues in cameron highlands (Malaysia) by principle factor analysis, Institute for Environment and Development (LESTARI), University Kebangsaan Malaysia, Selangor 43600, Malaysia. Received: 21 Feb 2010/Accepted: 1 Apr 2010/Published: 20 Apr 2010. J. Environ. Sci. Eng. 4(4) (Serial No. 29). ISSN 1934-8932, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Tashnehlab, S. Menhaj, Modeling trip tours using ANFIS, modeling. Univ. College Eng. 31(3), 361–370 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiyasha, T.M. Tung, Z.M. Yaseen, A survey on river water quality modelling using artificial intelligence models: 2000–2020. J. Hydrol. 585, 124670 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.124670. ISSN 0022-1694

  • Y. Wang, Y. Yuan, Y. Pan, Z. Fan, Modeling daily and monthly water quality indicators in a canal using a hybrid wavelet-based support vector regression structure. Water 12(5), 1476 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/w12051476

  • L. Yang, Fuzzy evaluation of water quality based on micronucleus technology of Vicia faba root tip. Mathe. Prob. Eng. 1–6, 6p (2019). https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/3047362

  • I.S. Yeon, J.H. Kim, K.W. Jun, Application of artificial intelligence models in water quality forecasting. Environ. Technol. 29(6), 625–631 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330801984456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • B. Yilmaz, A.R.A.S. Egemen, M. Kankal, S. Nacar, Sigma: suspended sediment load prediction in rivers by using heuristic regression and hybrid artificial intelligence models. J. Eng. Nat. Sci./Mühendislik Ve Fen Bilimleri Dergisi 38(2), 703–714, 12 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hadi Aljumaily .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Aljumaily, H., Hayder, G., Yussof, S., Ali, R.H. (2023). Artificial Intelligence Techniques for Predicting Water Quality Parameters and Management in a Complex River System: A Review. In: Salih, G.H.A., Saeed, R.A. (eds) Sustainability Challenges and Delivering Practical Engineering Solutions. Advances in Science, Technology & Innovation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-26580-8_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics