Skip to main content
  • 451 Accesses

Abstract

Since the 1970s, the traditional format of clinical database recording has been the subject of two developments: the problem-oriented record (POR) and the electronic medical record (EMR). The main tenet of the POR is the requirement for physicians to state their reasoning. It allows for the review of clinical decision-making, effective monitoring of the quality of patient care, and communication not only with other healthcare providers but also with medical students. EMRs are considered effective in organizing and reviewing data, improving the quality of care and staff satisfaction, saving pharmacy waste, and improving care coordination among physicians.

In this section, I propose an approach to teaching the recording of the clinical database. This approach applies the principles of learning for mastery by dividing the clinical record into discrete units, beginning with the psychosocial history and the patient’s chief concern/complaint. I list the difficulties students seemed to have in recording the statement of the present illness (PI) and suggest using a format for recording the PI to identify and correct errors in student presentations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Weed LL. Medical records that guide and teach. N Engl J Med. 1968;278:593–600.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Richter JG, Becker A, Koch T, Willers R, Nixdorf M, Schacher B, Monser R, Specker C, Alten R, Schneider M. Changing attitudes towards online electronic health records and online patient documentation in rheumatology outpatients. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2010;28:261–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Honeyman A, Cox B, Fisher B. Potential impacts of patient access to their electronic care records. Inform Prim Care. 2005;13:55–60.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Shachak A, Reis S. The impact of electronic medical records on patient-doctor communication during consultation: a narrative literature review. J Eval Clin Pract. 2009;15:641–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cherry BJ, Ford EW, Peterson LT. Experiences with electronic health records: early adopters in long-term care facilities. Health Care Manage Rev. 2011;36:265–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Shachak A, Montgomery C, Dow R, Barnsley J, Tu K, Jadad AR, Lemieux-Charles L. End-user support for primary care electronic medical records: a qualitative case study of users’ needs, expectations, and realities. Health Syst. 2013;2:198–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. White A, Danis M. Enhancing patient-centered communication and collaboration by using the electronic health record in the examination room. JAMA. 2013;309:2327–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Ventres WB, Kooienga S, Marlin R. EHRs in the exam room: tips on patient-centered care. Fam Pract Manag. 2006;13:45.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Duke P, Frankel RM, Reis S. How to integrate the electronic health record and patient-centered communication into the medical visit: a skills-based approach. Teach Learn Med. 2013;25:358–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Seidel HM, Ball JW, Dains JE, Benedict GW. Mosby’s guide to physical examination. 6th ed. St. Louis, MO: Mosby, Elsevier; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bickley LS, Szilagyi PG. Bates’ guide to physical examination and history taking. 11th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Morgan WL, Engel GL, editors. The clinical approach to the patient. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders; 1969. p. 197–204.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Weed LL. Medical records, medical education and patient care. 5th ed. Cleveland, OH: Case Western Reserve; 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Benbassat J. Common errors in the statement of the present illness. Med Ed, 1984;18:417–22.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Prior JA, Silberstein JS. (eds) Physical Diagnosis, (Fourth edition). C. V. Mosby Co., St Louis. 1973.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Benbassat, J. (2023). Recording the Clinical Database. In: Teaching Professional Attitudes and Basic Clinical Skills to Medical Students. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-26542-6_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-26542-6_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-26541-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-26542-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics