Skip to main content

Environmental Public Interest Litigation and the Application of Civil Code

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Environmental Public Interest Litigation in China
  • 97 Accesses

Abstract

China’s environmental public interest litigation has long been plagued by the lack of substantive legal basis. For this, the Civil Code passed in May 2020 added two ecological damage liability provisions to make up. These two clauses are respectively aimed at “restoration” and “compensation”, which together constitute a complete ecological environment damage compensation system, and provide a clear substantive law basis and specific rule guidance for environmental public interest litigation, which is of positive significance. However, these two provisions are still in principle and general. There are still many uncertainties in the legal attribute, the application of punitive damages, the definition of the concept of ecological environmental damage, the proof of causality and other specific aspects, which still need special legislation to improve the situation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Xi (2016), p. 114.

  2. 2.

    Mingyuan (2016), p. 64.

  3. 3.

    Zhongbin (2020), p. 50.

  4. 4.

    Liming (2020), p. 13.

  5. 5.

    Tao (2013), p. 101.

  6. 6.

    Article 55 of Civil Procedure Law (1991, amended 2007, 2012 and 2017).

  7. 7.

    Article 9, 14, 15, 17, 25, 26, 27 of SPC Interpretation on Several Issues Concerning the Application of Law in Environmental Civil Public Interest Litigation (2015).

  8. 8.

    Zhongmei and Haiyang (2017), p. 125.

  9. 9.

    Gong (2019), p. 136.

  10. 10.

    Mingyuan (2016), p. 94.

  11. 11.

    Xi (2021), p. 1.

  12. 12.

    Xuede (2019), p. 106.

  13. 13.

    Xi (2016), p. 101; Mingyuan (2016), p. 49; Gong (2019), p. 127; Zhongmei and Haiyang (2020), p. 118.

  14. 14.

    Xinbao (2017), p. 68.

  15. 15.

    Liming (2021), p. 224.

  16. 16.

    Kaiyuan (2020), p. 7.

  17. 17.

    Wei (2020), p. 461.

  18. 18.

    Wei (2020), pp. 461–462.

  19. 19.

    Civil Trial Theory Professional Committee of China Trial Theory Society (2020), p. 253.

  20. 20.

    Liming (2021), p. 219.

  21. 21.

    Xuguang (2020), p. 25.

  22. 22.

    Shaokun and Yudong (2020), p. 153.

  23. 23.

    Xuguang (2020), p. 24.

  24. 24.

    Article 1164 of Civil Code.

  25. 25.

    Articles 1165, 1166 of Civil Code.

  26. 26.

    Gong (2019), p.128; Zhongmei and Haiyang (2020), p. 126; Youhai and Qian (2019), p. 69.

  27. 27.

    Chen (2020).

  28. 28.

    Intermediate People’s Court of Shenzhen City (2021).

  29. 29.

    Liming (2021), pp. 221, 223.

  30. 30.

    Xuemin (2020), p. 68.

  31. 31.

    Yongfei (2021), p. 30; Dan (2020), p. 248.

  32. 32.

    Youhai (2022), pp. 29–32.

  33. 33.

    Xiaoran (2018), p. 52; Weixing and Yulin (2021), p. 94.

  34. 34.

    Shuyi and Lin (2017), p. 64.

  35. 35.

    Xiaogang (2021), p. 1.

  36. 36.

    Article 55 of Civil Procedure Law (1991, amended 2007, 2012 and 2017); Article 17 of SPC Several Provisions on the Trial of Cases on Ecological Damage Compensation (for Trial Implementation) (2019, amended 2020).

  37. 37.

    Hui (2014), p. 58; Gong (2016), p. 16; Zhanwen (2019), p. 119.

  38. 38.

    Zhiping (2020), p. 185.

  39. 39.

    Xuede (2019), p. 106.

  40. 40.

    Gong (2016), p. 26.

  41. 41.

    Youhai (2022), p. 32.

References

  • Chen W (2020) Explanation on the Draft Civil Code of the People’s Republic of China: Delivered at the Third Session of the 13th National People’s Congress on 22 May 2020 http://www.npc.gov.cn/npc/c30834/202005/50c0b507ad32464aba87c2ea65bea00d.shtml. Accessed 10 Jan 2022

  • Civil Trial Theory Professional Committee of China Trial Theory Society (2020) Understanding and judicial application of tort liability in civil code. Law Press, Bei Jing

    Google Scholar 

  • Dan L (2020) The limitation of the environmental damage punitive compensation claimers. Guangdong Soc Sci 3:46–253

    Google Scholar 

  • Gong G (2016) Empirical analysis of environmental civil public interest litigation in China in 2015. Law Sci 9:16–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Gong G (2019) Reflections on the positioning of the nature of environmental civil public interest litigation. Chinese J Law 3:127–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Hui Z (2014) Assumption of responsibility in environmental public interest civil litigation. Legal Forum 6:58–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Intermediate People’s Court of Shenzhen City (2021) The first public interest lawsuit for Maozhou River environmental pollution was pronounced. Accessed 10 January 2022

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaiyuan T (2020) Practical implementation of the “Civil Code” green clause which guided by the Xi Jinping thought of ecological civilisation. Natl Judge Coll J 23:3–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Liming W (2020) The characteristics of China, practice and times in civil code. Law Mod 4:1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Liming W (2021) Highlights of environmental pollution and ecological damage liability in civil code. Soc Sci Guangdong 1:216–225

    Google Scholar 

  • Mingyuan W (2016) On the development direction of environmental public interests litigation: analysis on administrative right and jurisdiction. China Legal Sci 1:49–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaokun F, Yudong Z (2020) On the new development of tort liability norms in civil code. Law Soc Dev 4:144–161

    Google Scholar 

  • Shuyi W, Lin L (2017) Punitive damages and its application in environmental infringement cases. Study Pract 8:64–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Tao B (2013) New starting point of environmental public interest litigation legislation. Law Rev 1:101–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Wei H (2020) Interpretation of the civil code of the People's Republic of China. China Legal Publishing House, Bei Jing

    Google Scholar 

  • Weixing W, Yulin H (2021) On the prudent application of punitive damages in the ecological environment damage compensation system. Nan Jing Soc Sci 9:91–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Xi W (2016) On the legislation order of environmental public interest litigation. Tsinghua Univ Law J 6:101–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Xi W (2021) Drawbacks in the system design of the environmental public interest litigation and ways of improvement. J Kunming Univ Sci Technol 1:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiaogang W (2021) Interpretation of ecological environment restoration cost theory in Article 1235 of civil code. J Gansu Univ Polit Sci Law 1:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiaoran Z (2018) On the construction of punitive damages in environmental civil public interest litigation. J Cent-South Univ (Soc Sci) 2:52–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Xinbao Z (2017) Study on the legislation of tort liability part of the civil code. China Legal Sci 3:49–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Xuede G (2019) On the repeated liability in environmental civil public interest litigation after the sanction of public law. Adm Law Rev 5:106–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Xuemin C (2020) Regulation of the punitive damages system in the environmental tort damage: based on the reflection of Article 1232 of the Civil Code 57. J China Univ Polit Sci Law 6:57–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Xuguang W (2020) The rule construction and understanding of green clause in civil code. Natl Judge Coll J 23:14–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Youhai S, Qian W (2019) Research on the Limitation of green regulation in Tort Liability Chapter of Civil Code: Disagreement on the inclusion of ecological environmental damage liability into the Civil Code from the perspective of “public-private division”. J Gansu Polit Sci Law Inst 562–569

    Google Scholar 

  • Youhai S (2022) Justification and application of punitive compensation for ecological environment damage. J China Univ Polit Sci Law 1:26–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhanwen Q (2019) The application and restriction of apology in civil public interest litigation. Tribune Polit Sci Law 4:119–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhiping L (2020) Research on ecological environment restoration mechanism of administrative order type. Law Rev 3:184–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhongbin L (2020) Let the spirit of the civil code be rooted in everyone’s heart. China’s Natl People’s Congr 22:50

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhongmei L, Haiyang D (2017) Responsibility of “restoration of ecological environment”: an empirical analysis. Chinese J Law 3:125–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhongmei L, Haiyang D (2020) Reconstructing environmental tort relief system through “ecological recovery theory”. Soc Sci China 2:118–140

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Gong, G. (2023). Environmental Public Interest Litigation and the Application of Civil Code. In: Wang, X., Zhao, X., McNamara, N. (eds) Environmental Public Interest Litigation in China. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-26526-6_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-26526-6_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-26525-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-26526-6

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics