Abstract
Several decision points exist in business processes (e.g., whether a purchase order needs a manager’s approval or not), and different decisions are made for different process instances based on their characteristics (e.g., a purchase order higher than €500 needs a manager approval). Decision mining in process mining aims to describe/predict the routing of a process instance at a decision point of the process. By predicting the decision, one can take proactive actions to improve the process. For instance, when a bottleneck is developing in one of the possible decisions, one can predict the decision and bypass the bottleneck. However, despite its huge potential for such operational support, existing techniques for decision mining have focused largely on describing decisions but not on predicting them, deploying decision trees to produce logical expressions to explain the decision. In this work, we aim to enhance the predictive capability of decision mining to enable proactive operational support by deploying more advanced machine learning algorithms. Our proposed approach provides explanations of the predicted decisions using SHAP values to support the elicitation of proactive actions. We have implemented a Web application to support the proposed approach and evaluated the approach using the implementation.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
- 3.
The experimental results are reproducible in https://github.com/aarkue/eXdpn/tree/main/quantitative_analysis along with the corresponding process model.
References
Apley, D.W., Zhu, J.: Visualizing the effects of predictor variables in black box supervised learning models. CoRR arXiv:abs/1612.08468 (2016)
Bazhenova, E., Weske, M.: Deriving decision models from process models by enhanced decision mining. In: Reichert, M., Reijers, H.A. (eds.) BPM 2015. LNBIP, vol. 256, pp. 444–457. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42887-1_36
Frosst, N., Hinton, G.E.: Distilling a neural network into a soft decision tree. CoRR arXiv:1711.09784 (2017)
Gilpin, L.H., Bau, D., Yuan, B.Z., Bajwa, A., Specter, M.A., Kagal, L.: Explaining explanations: An approach to evaluating interpretability of machine learning. CoRR arXiv:1806.00069 (2018)
Goldstein, A., Kapelner, A., Bleich, J., Pitkin, E.: Peeking inside the black box: visualizing statistical learning with plots of individual conditional expectation. J. Comput. Graph. Stat. 24(1), 44–65 (2015)
Greenwell, B.M., Boehmke, B.C., McCarthy, A.J.: A simple and effective model-based variable importance measure. CoRR arXiv:1805.04755 (2018)
Leemans, S.J.J., Fahland, D., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Discovering block-structured process models from event logs - a constructive approach. In: Colom, J.-M., Desel, J. (eds.) PETRI NETS 2013. LNCS, vol. 7927, pp. 311–329. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38697-8_17
de Leoni, M., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Data-aware process mining: discovering decisions in processes using alignments. In: Shin, S.Y., Maldonado, J.C. (eds.) 28th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, pp. 1454–1461. ACM (2013)
Lundberg, S.: Shap library documentation. https://shap.readthedocs.io/en/latest/index.html#. Accessed 05 Aug 2022
Lundberg, S.M., Lee, S.: A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. In: Guyon, I., et al. (eds.) NeurIPS 2017, pp. 4765–4774 (2017)
Mannhardt, F., de Leoni, M., Reijers, H.A., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Decision mining revisited - discovering overlapping rules. In: Nurcan, S., Soffer, P., Bajec, M., Eder, J. (eds.) CAiSE 2016. LNCS, vol. 9694, pp. 377–392. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39696-5_23
Park, G., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Towards reliable business process simulation: a framework to integrate ERP systems. In: Augusto, A., Gill, A., Nurcan, S., Reinhartz-Berger, I., Schmidt, R., Zdravkovic, J. (eds.) BPMDS/EMMSAD -2021. LNBIP, vol. 421, pp. 112–127. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79186-5_8
Park, G., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Action-oriented process mining: bridging the gap between insights and actions. Prog. Artif. Intell. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13748-022-00281-7
Ribeiro, M.T., Singh, S., Guestrin, C.: “why should I trust you?": explaining the predictions of any classifier. In: Krishnapuram, B., Shah, M., Smola, A.J., Aggarwal, C.C., Shen, D., Rastogi, R. (eds.) 22nd SIGKDD, pp. 1135–1144. ACM (2016)
Rozinat, A., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Decision mining in ProM. In: Dustdar, S., Fiadeiro, J.L., Sheth, A.P. (eds.) BPM 2006. LNCS, vol. 4102, pp. 420–425. Springer, Heidelberg (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/11841760_33
Safavian, S.R., Landgrebe, D.A.: A survey of decision tree classifier methodology. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 21(3), 660–674 (1991)
Acknowledgment
The authors would like to thank the Alexander von Humboldt (AvH) Stiftung for funding this research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Park, G., Küsters, A., Tews, M., Pitsch, C., Schneider, J., van der Aalst, W.M.P. (2023). Explainable Predictive Decision Mining for Operational Support. In: Troya, J., et al. Service-Oriented Computing – ICSOC 2022 Workshops. ICSOC 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13821. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-26507-5_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-26507-5_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-26506-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-26507-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)